Anti-Gang Law Rarely Used (original) (raw)
Carter F. Smith . . . said it's not surprising that enhanced penalties for gang members have been used sparingly in Tennessee. Politicians often propose stricter penalties for gun crimes, gang offenses and hate crimes. The laws might sound good to the public, but in reality, the statutes are rarely used by prosecutors, Smith said. "Most enhancement penalties are political responses to an outcry from the public," Smith said. "They are a huge waste of time." Smith said law enforcement could use existing conspiracy laws to crack down on gang activity, noting that the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act was one of the few successful examples of enhancement penalties. The federal law commonly referred to as RICO provides stiffer penalties for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization.
Related papers
Analysis, 2008
The Gang Abatement and Prevention Act of 2007 (S. 456) was introduced by Sen. Dianne Feinstein in January, 2007, and subsequently passed the following October. Its companion bill, the Gang Prevention, Intervention, and Suppression Act (HR 3547), sponsored by Rep. Adam ...
Evaluation of Gang Injunctions
Journal of Criminal Justice Research
"Gang injunctions (civil law suits against gangs) are a proactive attempt to reduce gang crime. For more than 25 years in California, gang injunctions have increased although their efficacy remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine whether gang injunctions reduce crime, when compared to baseline and matched control areas. Twenty-Five (25) gang injunctions from four California counties were evaluated by extracting crime data from court records and police agencies. The control areas (communities with a similar gang problem, but no gang injunctions) were matched for similar gang ethnicity, gang size, proximity, and gang activity. Criminological deterrence, association, environmental, and economic theories served as theoretical foundations for the study. Calls for service were evaluated for one year, pre-injunction, and one year, post-injunction, using paired t-tests which revealed that gang injunctions reduce crime. Calls for service were significantly reduced compared to baseline and compared to matched controls. It was found that Part 1 (violent crime) calls decreased 11.6% compared to baseline, while controls averaged an increase of 0.8%, a net benefit of 12.4%. Part 2 (less serious) calls decreased 15.9% compared to baseline, while controls averaged a mild increase of 1.6%, a net benefit of 17.5%. Total calls for service decreased 14.1% compared to baseline, while controls averaged an increase of 2.3%, a net benefit of 16.4%."
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.