From Sociohistory to Psychohistory (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sociocultural studies of mind / edited by James V. Wcrtsch, Pablo del Rio, Amelia Alvarez. p. cm. -(Learning in doing) ISBN 0-521-47056-0 (hbk.). -ISBN 0-521-47643-7 (pbk.) l. Ethnopsychology. 2. Social psychology. I. \\'crtsch, James V. II. Rio, Pablo del. III. Alvarez, Amelia. IV. Series. GN502.S65 1995 155.8 -dc20 94-34685 CIP Series foreword List of contributors page vii IX A catalog record for this hook is available from the British Library. Hardback ISBN 0-521-47643-7 Paperback Part I Human action: historical and theoretical foundations Cultural-historical psychology and the psychological theory of activity: retrospect and prospect Vladimir P. Zinchenko 2 The need for action in sociocultural research James V. Wertsch 3 Theories of action, speech, natural language, and discourse Jean-Paul Bronckart 37 56 75 Part II Mediation in action 4 Writing and the mind 95 David R. 01.1011 5 An approach to an integrated sensorimotor system in the human central brain and a subconscious computer 124 Tadanobu Tsunoda v \'1 Contents Part III Sociocultural setting, intersubjectivity, and the formation of the individual 6 Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship Barbara Rogoff The constitution of the subjeit: a persistent question Alia Luiza B. Smolka, A1aria Cecilia R. De Goes, and Angel Pillo 7 Part IV Sociocultural settings: design and intervention 8 Socio-cultural-historical psychology: some general remarks and a proposal for a new kind of culturalgenetic methodology Michael Cole 9 Tossing, praying, and thinking: the changing architectures of mind and agency Pablo del Rio and Amelia Alcarez Jlldex Series Foreword 139 165 187 This series for Cambridge University Press is becoming widely known as an international forum for studies of situated learning and cognition.
An analysis of theory and research in social psychology reveals that while methods of research are scientific in character, theories of social behavior are primarily reflections of contemporary history. The dissemination of psychological knowledge modifies the patterns of behavior upon which the knowledge is based. It does so because of the prescriptive bias of psychological theorizing, the liberating effects of knowledge, and the resistance based on common values of freedom and individuality. In addition, theoretical premises are based primarily on acquired dispositions. As the culture changes, such dispositions are altered, and the premises are often invalidated. Several modifications in the scope and methods of social psychology are derived from this analysis.
207 Social Psychology As History or Science: An Addendum
The present paper attempts to reassess the "social psychology as science or history" debate instigated by Gergen (1973). It is argued that although Gergen is correct in asserting the transhistorical variability of social psychological phenomena, the implication is that social contextual variables should be incorporated into our theoretical framework, rather than that we should engage in an historical endeavor.
Historical Relationships with Social Physicology
Historical, in addition to having auxiliary science in his knowledge, history also establish relationships with other sciences, especially fellow social sciences. In this connection what happens is a relationship of mutual need, herein lies the difference with the concept of science Auxiliary history, where a more dominant history in need of help to uncover a problem, more precisely we can call it with a combination of two social sciences. The development of post-World War II History shows a strong tendency to use the social sciences approach in historical studies. One of the basic ideas is that: the descriptive-narrative history is no longer satisfactory to explain complex problems or symptoms in the event of History. Psychology is very related to mental and psychological human. Humans who become the object of historical study is not just explained about the actions taken and what is caused by the action? why someone does that action? These questions pertain to the psychological condition in question. Conditions that can be caused by stimuli from the outside or the environment, can also from within himself. The use of social phsychology in history, gave birth to the focus of the study of the history of mentality
Histories, historiographies, and traces of some forgotten social psychologies
This article, which is set in the historical-critical tradition, is divided into three parts. The first part deals with the different possible ways of making history, both in general terms – with a marked attention to Nietzsche and Foucault’s points of view analysed in relation to the traditional ones – and in the psychological field. The second part refers to some fundamental elements of the historiographical debate concerning social psychology, with a particular emphasis on the disputes arisen from Gordon Allport’s historical chapter on the background of modern social psychology which was published in 1954 in Lindzey’s Handbook of Social Psychology. The third part draws on the results of a survey aimed at exploring the role played by some key issues, provided by Allport’s chapter, in the international scientific communication conveyed by the ‘Psychological literature’ from 1887 to 1954. Some ‘founding myths’ of the discipline are brought into question by the analysis of the survey’s main results: in particular, the myth supporting the idea of an Anglophone and entirely individuocentric social psychology, or that of an entirely sociocentric European tradition, and that of social psychology’s limited applicative disposition
The Historical Roots of Sociocultural Theory
2013
The work of sociocultural theory is to explain how individual mental functioning is related to cultural, institutional, and historical context; hence, the focus of the sociocultural perspective is on the roles that participation in social interactions and culturally organized activities play in influencing psychological development. While much of the framework for sociocultural theory was put forth by Lev Vygotsky (1931/1997), extensions, elaborations, and refinements of sociocultural theory can be found in writings regarding activity theory (Chaiklin & Lave, 1993; Leontiev, 1981) and cultural-historical activity theory (Cole, 1996; Cole & Engestrom, 1994).
Psychohistory A New Approach to Historical Studies
HISTORICAL SCIENCE and Methodology , 2019
Psychohistory is a historical research method in which psychological dynamics are taken into account with scientific rigor as an effective factor. But as the name suggests, it is also an interdisciplinary research field in which psychology and history disciplines cooperate. Historian James L. Ferguson defines psychohistory with a more comprehensive approach as a field of research that examines both the psychological motivations of individuals and groups that shape history and the psychological effects of historical events. According to Lloyd deMause, psychohistory is “the study of historical motivation, neither more nor less”. According to the definition of the New York Institute of Psychohistory, psychohistory, the science of historical motivations, combines the research methods of the social sciences with the content of psychotherapy and thus seeks to understand the emotional origins of national and group behavior in the past and present.