Introduction: The Culture of (Non)Conformity in Russia: From the Late Soviet Era to the Present. In: Russia – Culture of (Non-)Conformity: From the Late Soviet Time to the Present. Special Issue of the Journal "Russian Literature". Guest Editors: Klavdia Smola and Mark Lipovetsky, 2018, pp. 1-11 (original) (raw)
The present collection of papers is the first attempt to juxtapose the late Soviet and Putin eras in Russian nonconformist culture. The contributors examine shifts as well as zones of transition along the axis between conformity and nonconformity from the 1960s to the present. This focus on the exchange between the unofficial and official responds to the growing claim in recent scholarship, that it is necessary to approach late socialism and its countercultures as larger interacting discursive fields, and thus to complicate the previously assumed dichotomies. Moreover, the investigation of the hybridity of late socialism in the first part of the issue allows us to explore and understand the nuanced and even contradictory nature of (non)conformity after 2000 in the second part.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
The article discusses political processes in post-Soviet Russia from the perspective of the multiple modernities theory. A study of Russia's political transformation on the basis of this approach allows us to reconsider the obstacles to democratization that existed in the 1990s and the socio-cultural preconditions for de-democratization in the 2000s. The author draws on Johann Arnason's analysis of the Soviet model of modernity. From this perspective the Soviet model possessed only some civilizational traits and did not lead to a sustainable civilizational pattern. Nevertheless, remnants of that model and the imperial legacy of the Soviet period influenced Russian politics of the last two decades. The dynamics of democratization and de-democratization in Russia represent a case of path dependency which is both post-communist and post-imperial.
Competing Ideologies of Russia's Civil Society
Europe-Asia Studies, 2015
Many analysts and public opinion makers in the West conflate the notions of Russia's nonsystemic liberal opposition and the country's civil society. Indeed, despite garnering the support of a minority of Russia's population, non-systemic liberal opposition represents a well-organized civic group with a clearly articulated agenda and the ability to take action. Yet, does Russia's civil society end there? A closer look at the country's politics shows that Russia has a substantial conservative-traditionalist faction that has also developed agenda for action and formulated opinions. This group is anti-liberal rather than illiberal ideologically and pro-strong state/pro a geopolitically independent Russia rather than pro-Kremlin politically. The interaction between liberal and conservative civic groups represents the battle of meanings, ideas, and ethics, and ultimately determines the future trajectory of Russia's evolution. Thus, the analysis of Russia's civil society must represent a rather more nuanced picture than a mere study of the liberal nonsystemic opposition. This article will examine the complexity of Russia's civil society scene with reference to the interplay between the liberal opposition and conservative majority factions. The paper will argue that such complexity stems from ideological value pluralism that falls far beyond the boundaries of the liberal consensus, often skewing our understanding of political practice in Russia.
Societal transformation in Russia since 1980. Berlin Colloquium convenor's interview
Despite many promising recent advances, much of the public—and scholarly—debate about contemporary Russia remains dominated by three tendencies: an excessive focus on the political system and its elites, the use of a conceptual apparatus originally developed to make sense of Stalinism, and a view of Russia as unique and abnormal, informed by a time-honored tradition of selective international comparison. The aim of this Berlin Colloquium was to develop new approaches to understanding the transformation of Russian society in recent decades that would eschew these tendencies. To this purpose we brought together a small group of about twenty scholars: sociologists (as well as geographers and anthropologists) studying contemporary Russia and historians whose work spans the final decades of the USSR and the post-Soviet period. Together we experimented with new analytical concepts that might replace traditional, normatively charged terms such as “homo sovieticus,” “post-socialism,” “apathy” or “atomization,” “modernization” and “traditionalism.” We took 1980 as our symbolic start date—the year that marked the end of the 1970s oil boom and mass participation of Russian conscripts in the Afghan war, joining the mostly Central Asian soldiers deployed there since 1979. This began an almost uninterrupted series of military engagements that have had profound implications for Russian society.
On Russian Political Culture in the Twentieth Century
2018
This chapter briefly reviews how the major characteristics of political culture in 1936 evolved in other periods. I compare my findings of the 1930s with the main conclusions made by selected but representative sociological and historical studies regarding the postrevolutionary period, postwar period, late Soviet period, and modern Russia. This review shows the continuity of political culture.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.