Preclinical evaluation of Laromustine for use in combination with radiation therapy in the treatment of solid tumors (original) (raw)
Related papers
Potentiation of radiation effects on two murine tumors by lonidamine
Cancer research, 1986
Lonidamine is a potent inhibitor of spermatogenesis and a hyperthermic sensitizer. The principal established locus of biochemical action of lonidamine is a selective inhibitory effect of the energy metabolism either in NAD-linked reactions in germ cell mitochondria, as well as the glycolytic metabolism of a variety of tumor cell lines by means of inhibition of mitochondrially bound hexokinase. We carried out in vivo tumor experiments to determine whether lonidamine when combined with radiation could potentiate the cytotoxic effects of radiation on two murine tumors. The combined effects of single acute lonidamine (100 mg/kg) and single dose X-irradiation were evaluated on the transplanted methylcholanthrene-induced fibrosarcoma in BALB/c mice and on the radiation-induced fibrosarcoma in C3H/He mice. The radiosensitizing effect by lonidamine was maximal when lonidamine was administered immediately prior to or after X-irradiation. The dose modifying factor of lonidamine is estimated t...
Chemical research in toxicology, 2014
Prodrugs of 1,2-bis(methylsulfonyl)-1-(2-chloroethyl)hydrazine (90CE) are promising anticancer agents. The 90CE moiety is a readily latentiated, short-lived (t1/2 ∼ 30 s) chloroethylating agent that can generate high yields of oxophilic electrophiles responsible for the chloroethylation of the O-6 position of guanine in DNA. These guanine O-6 alkylations are believed to be responsible for the therapeutic effects of 90CE and its prodrugs. Thus, 90CE demonstrates high selectivity toward tumors with diminished levels of O(6)-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (MGMT), the resistance protein responsible for O(6)-alkylguanine repair. The formation of O(6)-(2-chloroethyl)guanine lesions ultimately leads to the generation of highly cytotoxic 1-(N(3)-cytosinyl),-2-(N(1)-guaninyl)ethane DNA interstrand cross-links via N(1),O(6)-ethanoguanine intermediates. The anticancer activity arising from this sequence of reactions is thus identical to this component of the anticancer activity of the clini...
Dose-Response, 2021
The rapid advances in nuclear medicine have resulted in significant advantages for the field of oncology. The focus is on the application of radiopharmaceuticals as therapeuticals. In addition, the latest developments in cell biology (the understanding of the cell structure, function, metabolism, genetics, signaling, transformation) have given a strong scientific boost to radiation oncology. In this regard, the article discusses what is soon going to be a new jump in radiation oncology based on the already accumulated considerable knowledge at the cellular level about the mechanisms of cell transformation and tumor progression, cell response to radiation, cell resistance to apoptosis and radiation and cell radio-sensitivity. The mechanisms of resistance of tumor cells to radiation and the genetically determined individual sensitivity to radiation in patients (which creates the risk of radiation-induced acute and late side effects) are the 2 major challenges to overcome in modern nuc...
Interaction between novel anticancer agents and radiation in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines
Lung Cancer, 2001
Integration of chemotherapy and radiation is the standard practice in the management of locally advanced inoperable NSCLC. To assess the biological interaction between third generation chemotherapeutic agents and radiation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in vitro, we tested a number of different drugs (paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine, topotecan, SN-38 and cisplatin) combined with radiation, in lung cancer cell lines. Cellular chemosensitivity was determined, using the semi-automated colorimetric MTT assay, after 48, 72 and 96 h of exposure to increasing drug concentrations, (0.001-100 microM) and radiation doses (100-400 cGy). Cell lines used were the adenocarcinoma (ADK), A-549, and the squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC), LX-1. Cells were pre-treated with anticancer agents at 24, 12 and 0 h before irradiation. Cytofluorimetric cell cycle analysis was performed. A significant S-phase block or a G(2)/M block was seen with gemcitabine and topotecan or paclitaxel pre-treatment, respectively. Apoptosis was seen only after paclitaxel exposure in the A-549 cell line. Despite a similar pattern of cell-kinetic changes induced by chemotherapy pre-treatment in all cell lines, the adenocarcinoma A-549 cell line was not radiosensitized by any of the anticancer agents tested, whereas synergism was observed in the LX-1 squamous carcinoma cell line, when exposed to gemcitabine, SN-38, topotecan and cisplatin. Paclitaxel, despite a favourable cell cycle effect, was not found to be synergistic with radiotherapy in our experimental model. In conclusion, the observed synergism appears to be dose- and timing-independent and seems to be related to the histological subtype being present in SCC only. Favourable perturbation of the cell cycle is evident with all the new agents tested in both cell types, but was not sufficient to produce synergism with radiation.