El efecto de la presencia de ítems asimétricos en la estimación de la fiabilidad del test: una comparación entre los coeficientes Alfa, Omega y dos alternativas de Greatest Lower Bound (original) (raw)

Abstract

Este trabajo ha sido financiado por el programa de Becas Chile de Conicyt, en su modalidad de estudios de doctorado en el extranjero.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (28)

  1. American Educational Research Association., American Psychological Association., & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). The Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  2. Berge, J. M. F., & Sočan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69(4), 613-625. http://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289858
  3. Bernaards, C., & Jennrich, R. (2015). Package "GPArotation." Retrieved from http://ftp.daum.net/CRAN/web/packages/GPArotation/GPArotation.pdf
  4. Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha: Well Known but Poorly Understood. Organizational Research Methods, 18(2), 207-230. http://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114555994
  5. Cortina, J. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/apl/78/1/98/
  6. Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
  7. Elosua, P., & Zumbo, B. D. (2008). Coeficientes de fiabilidad para escalas de respuesta categórica ordenada. Psicothema, 20(4), 896- 901.
  8. Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability what they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 930-944.
  9. Green, S., & Yang, Y. (2009a). Commentary on coefficient alpha: A cautionary tale. Psychometrika, 74(1), 121-135. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11336-008-9098-4
  10. Green, S., & Yang, Y. (2009b). Reliability of summed item scores using structural equation modeling: an alternative to coeficient Alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 155-167.
  11. Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10(4), 255-282.
  12. Ho, A. D., & Yu, C. C. (2014). Descriptive Statistics for Modern Test Score Distributions: Skewness, Kurtosis, Discreteness, and Ceiling Effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1-24. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013164414548576
  13. Hogan, T. P., Benjami, A., & Brezinski, K. L. (2000). Reliability methods: A note on the frequency of use of various types. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60(523-531).
  14. Javali, S. B., Gudaganavar, N. V, & Raj, S. M. (2011). Effect of Varying Sample Size in Estimation of Coefficients of Internal Consistency. Retrieved from https://www.webmedcentral.com/wmcpdf/Article\_WMC001649.pdf
  15. Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2, 151-160.
  16. McDonald, R. (1999). Test Theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Micceri, T. (1989). The unicorn, the normal curve, and other improbable creatures. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 156-166. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.156
  18. Novick, M. R., & Lewis, C. (1967). Coefficient alpha and the reliability of composite measurements. Psychometrika, 32, 1-13.
  19. R Development Core Team. (2013). R : A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. ("R Foundation for Statistical Computing," Ed.). Vienna. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74686-7
  20. Racine, J. (2012). Rstudio: A plataform-independet IDE for R and Sweave. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 27(4), 167-172. http://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1278
  21. Referencias Revelle, W. (2015a). Alternative estimates of test reliabiity. Retrieved from http://personality-project.org/r/html/guttman.html Revelle, W. (2015b). Package "psych." Retrieved from http://personality-project.org/r/psych-manual.pdf
  22. Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145-154. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z Santisteban, C. (2009). Principios de Psicometría. Madrid: Síntesis.
  23. Sheng, Y., & Sheng, Z. (2012). Is coefficient alpha robust to non-normal data? Frontiers in Psychology, 3(34), 1-13. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00034
  24. Sijtsma, K. (2009a). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120.
  25. Sijtsma, K. (2009b). Reliability beyond theory and into practice. Psychometrika, 74(1), 137-143. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008- 9100-1
  26. Tang, W., & Cui, Y. (2009). Internal Consistency: Do We Really Know What It Is and How to Assess it? Woodhouse, B., & Jackson, P. H. (1977). Lower bounds for the reliability of the total score on a test composed of non-homogeneous items: II: A search procedure to locate the greatest lower bound. Psychometrika, 42(4), 579-591.
  27. Yang, Y., & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient Alpha: A Reliability Coefficient for the 21st Century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377-392. http://doi.org/10.1177/0734282911406668
  28. Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern …, 6(1), 21-29.