Europeanization and Spanish welfare: the case of employment policy (original) (raw)

Spain: Double track Europeanization, and the search for bilateralism

Spain could be seen as a clear-cut case for the Europeanization of EU member State’s foreign policies in general, as well as in the specific case of Latin America. First, Spain is the only EU member State that gives Latin America a preferential position among its foreign policy priorities; therefore it is the main sponsor of relations with Latin America at the EU level. Second, Spanish governments, political elites and public opinion have been strong supporters of deeper EU integration, and therefore of a common EU foreign policy. Third, Spain joined the EU in 1986, when many of the EU policies were firmly in place, so becoming a member meant an intense and relatively fast process of internal adaptation to then existing European policies, norms and practices, including EU external relations. And fourth, Spain has had a key role in the origins and development of EU policy towards Latin America, which is one of the newest dimensions of EU external relations. This chapter argues that the Spanish case shows the importance of a ‘bottom-up’, or upload approach, in order to analyze how member states shape EU norms, institutions, policies and practices, as much as the usual ‘top-down’ approach more common in Europeanization literature. This case also reveals the importance of history and identity and other ideational factors, besides material ones, as independent variables in the analysis of Europeanization dynamics. These variables are important in explaining how Spain has faced ‘adaptation pressures’ from EU policies, and how it has promoted its national preferences at the European level. It could also offer some insights about the process of foreign policy formation and decision-making in EU institutions and its member states when Europeanization dynamics, meet with strong historical and socio-cultural linkages.

Las Politicas Comunitarias: Una Visión Interna: 20 Años de España en la Unión Europea

JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies

In The Europeanization of British Politics, the impact of EU membership for Britain's politics is seen as a cyclical process, involving constant interactions between national and European arenas and linking actors across different sectors and levels. This impact has been significant but is not always recognized-as can be deduced from the EU implications in virtually all pivotal events in British national politics in recent history, including Labour's opposition period, the fall of both Thatcher and Major, the crisis within the Conservative Party, the emergence and substance of the New Labour project and the developments in Northern Ireland. The volume satisfyingly succeeds in its aim not only to report on and better appreciate Europeanization in Britain, but also to add to and strengthen the existing building blocks of our theoretical understanding of Europeanization more generally. Perhaps the most interesting theoretical findings of this volume are the analytical limitations of two of the much-used taxonomies in the field of Europeanization when applied to the British case. Firstly, the neat concurrence between dimensions of Europeanization (polity, politics and policies) and intensities of Europeanization (semi-Europeanization, largely non-Europeanization and progressive Europeanization, respectively) that have been reported elsewhere for Germany, simply does not follow for the British case. Secondly, the categorization that is repeatedly used to analyse the degree of domestic change (inertia, retrenchment, absorption, accommodation and transformation) is proved to be overly restrictive for the British case, since it leaves little room for gradual change that over time amounts to transformation. In the volume, such change is found in Burch and Gomez's study on the English regions and in Bulmer and Burch's study of central government. The editors propose that the Europeanization literature is relatively underdeveloped due to the lack of attention to its 'political' dimension. While their concern is by all means justified, it is therefore surprising that the volume does not devote a separate case study to Parliament, and that there is a single case study on the dynamics within the political and administrative executive, without differentiating between the two spheres of central government. The Europeanization literature may not have come of age yet, but The Europeanization of British Politics certainly pushes it into adolescence, both in empirical and theoretical terms. Besides its emphasis on the cyclical nature of Europeanization, it helpfully recognizes first-and second-generation Europeanization, in

CHAPTER 15. CONCLUSIONS. THE SPANISH WELFARE STATE IN EUROPEAN CONTEXT

Describing and critically analysing the characteristics of the Spanish welfare state since the transition to contemporary democracy has been the core aim of this book. As explained in the Introduction, although this project was not designed to use a comparative methodology, it includes a comparative dimension, in two main respects.

European Employment Strategy and Spanish Labour Market Policies

2005

The paper aim is to analyse the influence of the European Employment Strategy (EES) in the implementation of the Spanish labour market policies. The first part of the paper describes the evolution and content of the EES. In the second one, the definition of activation is also explained. In addition to that, the ways how the EES develops and promotes active labour market policies are examined.

Spain's membership in the EU and the European welfare state

2011

"Membership in the EEC/EU has brought incentives for Spain to achieve economic ‘real’ convergence. Figures of economic growth are significant in this respect: in 1985 the per head income in purchasing power parity (PPP) was 70.6 percent of EU's mean; in 2007, it had already reached 103.0 percent regarding the UE-27. During the last 25 years, Spain’s welfare has converged with those more mature systems of social protection in the EU. Social spending has grown at both a quicker and higher pace as compared to other European countries. The process of Europeanization has had a great impact in Spain’s welfare development, although the economic crisis has put a halt in this process. This paper reviews social developments in Spain having as analytical reference the European welfare state in its diverse institutionalizations. Spanish welfare state appears as a via media between corporatist Continental, liberal Anglo-Saxon, and social-democratic Nordic worlds of welfare capitalism."

Unpacking EU contestation: Europeanization and critique in Germany and Spain

Culture, Practice and Europeanization, 2019

The rise of populist contenders in Western Europe in the aftermath of the euro crisis has led to an increasing critique of the project of the European Union (EU). This critique has been frequently encapsulated in the label 'Euroscepticism' and its softer or harder gradations. This article proposes to revisit this phenomenon from a different angle: the discur-sive and historical exploration of EU contestation in its context. This paper argues that the forms of EU contestation must be studied together with the symbolic orders about Europe and the EU at the national level. Drawing on the Sociology of Knowledge Approach to Discourse (SKAD), this article delineates the diverse representations and problematizations of EU-contesting discourses in Western Europe studying the cases of Germany and Spain. The findings show greater power to constrain (power in discourse) EU contestation in Spain than in Germany, the latter country being a more suitable terrain for critique of the EU. These divergences are connected to the historical processes of Europeanization in each country and their particular symbolic orders.

Activación y flexiguridad". ¿La europeización superficial del empleo?

Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales, 2015

In the domain of social protection and social policy, a conventional way of trying to document "Europeanization" has always been to track European English policy discourses at the EU level and in the nations of Europe. Notions that crystallize the normative orientations promoted in the forums of political communication and in the policy communities are numerous. All of them are crafted in English and travel across national forums of political communication and national scientific forums. The present paper selects two such notions, i.e. "activation" and "flexicurity" and carefully studies the locus of their inventions and the travels across many countries and many forums-national and transnational. The precise documentation is based on participation in numerous forums, field studies in Denmark, Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Italy over a long period (1997-2008). The findings are all relevant for this period, i. e. prior to the upheaval of social policies at the EU level and in the member states provoked by the financial and economic crisis. They have in common to identify the dissemination of a standard discourse and the resilience of national substantive choices and roles of actors of social protection and labour market policies. Because the paper is written with hindsight, taking stock of the late 1990s and early 2000s, a de facto comparison unexpectedly becomes feasible with the crisis period (2008-2014). The counterfactual is easy to design: a powerful Europeanization of systems of social protection and labour markets has happened in this second period, via the highly constrained implementation of structural reform and budget cuts programmes deemed to satisfy macroeconomic and macrofiscal orientations decided at the EU level, especially within the Eurozone, and especially in the Southern member states. Whereas the Europeanization of discourse and social policy concepts remained superficial in 1997-2008, actual and hard Europeanization really bit deeply since the crisis into national arrangements, even affecting international and European labour law.

The battle of ideas in the European field: the combat to defeat unemployment and the struggle to give it a name

* Researcher and lecturer at the Complutense University of Madrid, Faculty of Social Sciences 1 The author wishes to thank Kathleen Llanwarne for her excellent translation. This article incorporates some of the discussions published by the author in earlier works and was produced in the framework of the following projects 'Qualitative evaluation of activation policies: the limits of the active and the passive' (Spanish Education and Science Ministry project, SEJ2007-64604) and 'Protection and flexicurity. The modernisation of the public employment services' (FIPROS 2008/35 Ministry of Labour and Immigration project). Summary A key role in selecting and defining the notions underpinning labour and social policies has been taken up by the European institutions. It is argued in this article that there is a need, in analysing the ideas put forward by these institutions, to maintain, in parallel, a twofold analytical stance. While it is necessary to focus on the European institutions' preferred modes of governance in relation to employment and social questions, it is equally important to conduct a 'meta-analysis' of their policy formulations. Taking as a prime example the ambiguous and polyphonic notion of 'flexicurity', presented in the policy discourse as a response to the new challenges of work, this article discusses the new modes of governance proposed by the European institutions in relation to 'the social question'. ❖❖❖ Sommaire Les institutions européennes constituent de plus en plus un espace de référence dans le domaine du travail et des politiques sociales. Dans cet article, l'auteur préconise, lorsqu'il s'agira d'analyser les propositions formulées par ces institutions, l'adoption d'une approche analytique à double facette. D'une part, il est essentiel de se focaliser sur la manière dont les institutions européennes traitent les questions sociales et d'emploi. En complément, il est tout aussi important de mener une " méta-analyse " de leurs propositions. En s'appuyant sur la notion polysémique et ambigüe de " flexicurité " , présentée dans le discours politique comme une réponse aux nouveaux défis posés par l'emploi, cet article souligne les nouvelles manières d'aborder la question sociale proposées par les institutions européennes.