Factors associated with phantom limb pain: a 31/2-year prospective study (original) (raw)
Related papers
Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study
Pain, 2000
Phantom pain in subjects with an amputated limb is a well-known problem. However, estimates of the prevalence of phantom pain differ considerably in the literature. Various factors associated with phantom pain have been described including pain before the amputation, gender, dominance, and time elapsed since the amputation. The purposes of this study were to determine prevalence and factors associated with phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees in The Netherlands. Additionally, the relationship between phantom pain, phantom sensations and prosthesis use in upper limb amputees was investigated. One hundred twenty-four upper limb amputees participated in this study. Subjects were asked to fill out a self-developed questionnaire scoring the following items: date, side, level, and reason of amputation, duration of experienced pain before amputation, frequencies with which phantom sensations, phantom pain, and stump pain are experienced, amount of trouble and suffering experienced, respectively, related to these sensations, type of phantom sensations, medical treatment received for phantom pain and/or stump pain, and the effects of the treatment, self medication, and prosthesis use. The response rate was 80%. The prevalence of phantom pain was 51%, of phantom sensations 76% and of stump pain 49%; 48% of the subjects experienced phantom pain a few times per day or more; 64% experienced moderate to very much suffering from the phantom pain. A significant association was found between phantom pain and phantom sensations (relative risk 11.3) and between phantom pain and stump pain (relative risk 1.9). No other factors associated with phantom pain or phantom sensations could be determined. Only four patients received medical treatment for their phantom pain. Phantom pain is a common problem in upper limb amputees that causes considerable suffering for the subjects involved. Only a minority of subjects are treated for phantom pain. Further research is needed to determine factors associated with phantom pain.
Phantom Pain and Health-Related Quality of Life in Lower Limb Amputees
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2002
Amputation of a limb may affect quality of life. However, little is known concerning healthrelated quality of life in amputees. The purposes of this study were to describe health-related quality of life in a population of lower limb amputees and to investigate potential determinants, including phantom pain. Data from 437 patients with a lower limb amputation were analyzed in this cross-sectional study. Amputation-related problems were investigated using a questionnaire. Health-related quality of life was investigated using the RAND-36 DLV. Amputees with phantom pain had a poorer health-related quality of life than amputees without phantom pain. In general, the most important amputation-specific determinants of health-related quality of life were 'walking distance ' and 'stump pain.'
2019
Background and objective Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a common complication in people with limb amputations. There are conflicting reports in the literature regarding the prevalence of PLP in people with limb amputations. Therefore, this review aimed to determine the estimated pooled prevalence of PLP, and risk factors associated with this complication. Methods Articles published between 1980 and July 2019 were identified through a systematic search of the following electronic databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Africa−Wide Information, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Academic Search Premier. Grey literature was searched on databases for preprints. Two reviewers independently performed the screening of articles, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. The meta−analyses were conducted using the random−effects model. A statistically significant level for the analyses was set...
Original article, 2022
Objective: To determine the prevalence of phantom limb pain and stump pain in amputees during first six months of amputation and to examine the intensity of phantom limb pain and stump pain with the passage of time. Methodology: It was cross sectional survey conducted from 16 th May to 30 th November 2019 at District Head Quarter hospital and Allied hospital Faisalabad during first six months of amputation. Total 80 patients including both gender and age ranging from 18-75 years were enrolled in the study. Data was collected using a questionnaire named "Phantom and stump pain questionnaire in amputees. And data was analyzed by using SPSS 20. Results: It was observed that 45 (56.25%) were males and 35 (43.75%) were females. In this study 22 (27.50%) patients were presented with upper limb amputation and 58 (72.50%) were with lower limb amputation. Findings of this study showed that the prevalence of phantom limb pain was 48 (60%) and stump pain was 52 (65%) and their intensity decreased with the passage of time because a negative correlation was found between two variables "duration since amputation and phantom pain" (r =-0.76, p = .000) and "duration since amputation and stump pain" (r =-0.49, p = .000). Stump pain was most common in traumatic cause of amputation and phantom limb pain was seen more in patient with amputation due to diabetes and peripheral vascular disease. Conclusion: It was concluded that phantom limb pain and stump pain appeared to be common in patients after upper and lower limb amputation during first six months of amputation and it was reported that the intensity of pain decreases gradually with the passage of time.
Systematic Reviews, 2019
Background: The prevalence of phantom limb pain (PLP) in people with amputations is unclear because of the conflicting reports across the literature. It is proposed that the conflicting reports on the prevalence of PLP are a consequence of variations in the time period during which the studies were undertaken, countries in which the studies were conducted and recruitment processes implemented during collection of epidemiological data. In consideration of these factors, we aim to gather and critically appraise relevant literature to determine the prevalence estimate of and risk factors for PLP in people with amputations. Methods: We will use a customised search strategy containing relevant words and terms to search the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed (via EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (via EBSCOhost), PsycArticles, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (via EBSCOhost), Africa-Wide Information (via EBSCOhost), Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition (via EBSCOhost) SCOPUS, Web of Science and Academic Search Premier (via EBSCOhost). The risk of bias assessment will be conducted using a risk of bias assessment tool for prevalence studies, and data will be extracted using a piloted customised data extraction sheet. Data extracted from individual studies will be entered into Review Manager 5 and assessed for clinical and statistical heterogeneity. Studies will be pooled for meta-analysis using the random-effects model to determine a summary estimate of the prevalence of PLP across included studies. A statistically significant level will be set at p < 0.05. Discussion: As far as we know, a systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of, and risk factors for PLP in people with amputations has not been conducted. Given the varying reports in the literature, it is necessary to determine an estimate of the prevalence of PLP to generate an informed conclusion on this subject. The results of this review will be published in an internationally accredited journal and used to inform researchers, clinicians, policy-makers and the public about the burden of, and risk factors for PLP. This will be done with a further aim to improve the quality of pain management in society. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018094821
Phantom pain in bilateral upper limb amputation
Disability & Rehabilitation, 2009
Purpose. To alert health professionals on presence and extent of phantom pain and sensation following bilateral upper limb amputation. Methods. Of a total of 140 war-related bilateral upper limb amputees in Iran, 103 subjects were thoroughly examined in this cross-sectional study by a physical medicine specialist. The patients were questioned for the presence of phantom pain and sensations, and frequency and intensity of the feeling were recorded. Results. At 17.1 + 6.1 years after injury, 82.0% of the 103 amputees suffered from phantom sensation, including varying degrees of phantom limb pain in 53.9% of stumps. Phantom phenomena had a higher frequency in the right extremities, but this was not statistically significant (p 4 0.01). Of those amputees who had phantom pain or sensation, 51.2% reported that they 'always' had phantom limb sensation; and approximately one-fourth of the subjects (24.6%) 'always' had phantom pain. Among the stumps who reported phantom pain (N ¼ 112), the pain was excruciating (38.5%), distressing (34.9%) or discomforting (25.6%). A significant statistical relation between phantom limb sensation and level of amputation was observed (p 5 0.01). Conclusion. At this time there is no healing for phantom pain; medical and surgical modalities only bring temporary relief, and less than 1% of the respondents achieve permanent relief through different treatment methods.
Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2002
Phantom pain has been given considerable attention in literature. Phantom pain reduces quality of life, and patients suffering from phantom pain make heavy use of the medical system. Many risk factors have been identified for phantom pain in univariate analyses, including phantom sensations, stump pain, pain prior to the amputation, cause of amputation, prosthesis use, and years elapsed since amputation. Multivariate analyses are lacking in the literature and, therefore, no estimation of an overall risk for phantom pain can be made. The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors in a multivariate analysis in 536 subjects (19% upper limb amputees and 81% lower limb amputees). These subjects filled out a questionnaire in which the following items were assessed; side, date, level, and reason of amputation, pre-amputation pain, presence or absence of phantom pain, phantom sensations and or stump pain, and prosthesis use. The prevalence of phantom pain was 72% (95% CI: 68 to 76%) for the total group, 41% (95% CI: 31 to 51%) in upper limb amputees and 80% (95% CI: 76 to 83%) in lower limb amputees. The most important risk factors for phantom pain were "bilateral amputation" and "lower limb amputation." The risk for phantom pain ranged from 0.33 for a 10-year-old patient with a distal upper limb amputation to 0.99 for a subject of 80 years with a bilateral lower limb amputation of which one side is an above knee amputation.