Systemic risk in a large claims insurance market with bipartite graph structure (original) (raw)
Related papers
Conditional risk measures in a bipartite market structure
Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2017
In this paper we study the effect of network structure between agents and objects on measures for systemic risk. We model the influence of sharing large exogeneous losses to the financial or (re)insuance market by a bipartite graph. Using Pareto-tailed losses and multivariate regular variation we obtain asymptotic results for conditional risk measures based on the Value-at-Risk and the Conditional Tail Expectation. These results allow us to assess the influence of an individual institution on the systemic or market risk and vice versa through a collection of conditional risk measures. For large markets Poisson approximations of the relevant constants are provided. Differences of the conditional risk measures for an underlying homogeneous and inhomogeneous random graph are illustrated by simulations.
Ruin probabilities for risk processes in a bipartite network
Stochastic Models, 2020
This paper studies risk balancing features in an insurance market by evaluating ruin probabilities for single and multiple components of a multivariate compound Poisson risk process. The dependence of the components of the process is induced by a random bipartite network. In analogy with the non-network scenario, a network ruin parameter is introduced. This random parameter, which depends on the bipartite network, is crucial for the ruin probabilities. Under certain conditions on the network and for light-tailed claim size distributions we obtain Lundberg bounds and, for exponential claim size distributions, exact results for the ruin probabilities. For large sparse networks, the network ruin parameter is approximated by a function of independent Poisson variables.
How Damage Diversification Can Reduce Systemic Risk
We consider the problem of risk diversification in complex networks. Nodes represent e.g. financial actors, whereas weighted links represent e.g. financial obligations (credits/debts). Each node has a risk to fail because of losses resulting from defaulting neighbors, which may lead to large failure cascades. Classical risk diversification strategies usually neglect network effects and therefore suggest that risk can be reduced if possible losses (i.e., exposures) are split among many neighbors (exposure diversification, ED). But from a complex networks perspective diversification implies higher connectivity of the system as a whole which can also lead to increasing failure risk of a node. To cope with this, we propose a different strategy (damage diversification, DD), i.e. the diversification of losses that are imposed on neighboring nodes as opposed to losses incurred by the node itself. Here, we quantify the potential of DD to reduce systemic risk in comparison to ED. For this, we develop a branching process approximation that we generalize to weighted networks with (almost) arbitrary degree and weight distributions. This allows us to identify systemically relevant nodes in a network even if their directed weights differ strongly. On the macro level, we provide an analytical expression for the average cascade size, to quantify systemic risk. Furthermore, on the meso level we calculate failure probabilities of nodes conditional on their system relevance. PACS numbers: 89.75.-k, 89.65.-s, 02.50.-r arXiv:1503.00925v1 [physics.soc-ph]
Insurance Activities and Systemic Risk
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
This paper investigates systemic risk in the insurance industry. We first analyze the systemic contribution of the insurance industry vis-à-vis other industries by applying 3 measures, namely the linear Granger causality test, conditional value at risk and marginal expected shortfall, on 3 groups, namely banks, insurers and non-financial companies listed in Europe over the last 14 years. We then analyze the determinants of the systemic risk contribution within the insurance industry by using balance sheet level data in a broader sample. Our evidence suggests that i) the insurance industry shows a persistent systemic relevance over time and plays a subordinate role in causing systemic risk compared to banks, and that ii) within the industry, those insurers which engage more in non-insurance-related activities tend to pose more systemic risk. In addition, we are among the first to provide empirical evidence on the role of diversification as potential determinant of systemic risk in the insurance industry. Finally, we confirm that size is also a significant driver of systemic risk, whereas price-to-book ratio and leverage display counterintuitive results.
Diversification and Systemic Risk: A Financial Network Perspective
Risks, 2018
In this paper, we study the implications of diversification in the asset portfolios of banks for financial stability and systemic risk. Adding to the existing literature, we analyse this issue in a network model of the interbank market. We carry out a simulation study that determines the probability of a systemic crisis in the banking network as a function of both the level of diversification, and the connectivity and structure of the financial network. In contrast to earlier studies we find that diversification at the level of individual banks may be beneficial for financial stability even if it does lead to a higher asset return correlation across banks.
Risk management, 2021
This paper is part of the research on the interlinkages between insurers and their contribution to systemic risk on the insurance market. Our work constitutes an answer to the recommendations contained in the 2017 report of the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), an independent EU advisory body to the European Parliament, the Council of Europe and the European Commission, which shows that when analysing systemic risk in the insurance sector, one should take into account, among others, the dynamics of interconnectedness between institutions. The present article is another study of the authors in this subject. Its main purpose is to present the results of the analysis of linkage dynamics and systemic risk in the European insurance sector using hybrid models combining statistical-econometric tools with network modelling and predictive analysis tools. These networks are based on dynamic dependence structures modelled using a copula. Then, we determine the Minimum Spanning Trees. Finally, the linkage dynamics is described by means of the time series of selected topological network indicators.
The Impact of Systemic Risk on the Diversification Benefits of a Risk Portfolio
Risk diversification is the basis of insurance and investment. It is thus crucial to study the effects that could limit it. One of them is the existence of systemic risk that affects all of the policies at the same time. We introduce here a probabilistic approach to examine the consequences of its presence on the risk loading of the premium of a portfolio of insurance policies. This approach could be easily generalized for investment risk. We see that, even with a small probability of occurrence, systemic risk can reduce dramatically the diversification benefits. It is clearly revealed via a non-diversifiable term that appears in the analytical expression of the variance of our models. We propose two ways of introducing it and discuss their advantages and limitations. By using both VaR and TVaR to compute the loading, we see that only the latter captures the full effect of systemic risk when its probability to occur is low.
Systemic risk in financial networks: a graph theoretic approach
2004
This paper puts forward a novel approach, based on the theory of network flows, for the analysis of default contagion in financial systems. We use a graph$theoretic representation of a financial network and of the flows of losses that can propagate across such a ...
Article The Impact of Systemic Risk on the Diversification Benefits of a Risk Portfolio
2014
Risk diversification is the basis of insurance and investment. It is thus crucial to study the effects that could limit it. One of them is the existence of systemic risk that affects all of the policies at the same time. We introduce here a probabilistic approach to examine the consequences of its presence on the risk loading of the premium of a portfolio of insurance policies. This approach could be easily generalized for investment risk. We see that, even with a small probability of occurrence, systemic risk can reduce dramatically the diversification benefits. It is clearly revealed via a non-diversifiable term that appears in the analytical expression of the variance of our models. We propose two ways of introducing it and discuss their advantages and limitations. By using both VaR and TVaR to compute the loading, we see that only the latter captures the full effect of systemic risk when its probability to occur is low.
Does Risk Diversification Always Work? The Answer Through Simple Modelling
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013
With a simple example of throwing a dice, we show how to price an insurance policy. We further study how this price decreases when many similar policies are sold. The diversification benefits increase with the number of policies and similarly the risk loading of the premium required for the risk decreases tending to zero. This is true as long as the risks are completely independent. However, when introducing in addition a biased dice played by a crooked croupier, a non-diversifiable risk does appear. Indeed, we can show analytically that, with the biased dice, there exists an additional term in the variance, which does not decrease with the number of policies in the portfolio and leads to a limit to diversification. We propose and study analytically three cases of introducing the non-diversifiable risk. For each of them, the behavior of the risk loading based on the underlying risk process is examined and a numerical illustration is provided. Then the results are discussed in view of the risk loading. Such a modelling could be used to study particular investment choices under uncertainty.