Integrity of the system: What happens when the state’s higher education oversight body’s role and trust is brought into question by a justice department? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Quality assurance agencies: Creating a conducive environment for academic integrity
South African Journal of Science, 2019
Academic integrity is a key measure of the quality, efficiency and competitiveness of higher education systems. This article explores how a quality assurance agency can foster a conducive environment for academic quality and integrity. A self-study methodology was used, with a focus on the insights and experiences of the Zimbabwe Council for Higher Education over a 10-year period. The findings show that by assuming an innovative and transformational leadership role in instilling a culture of self-evaluation, as well as maintaining its own integrity, an external quality assurance agency can improve academic integrity. The article adds value to the existing knowledge by advancing the higher education ecosystem approach as an integrity-based panacea and conducive way to induce integrity to flow from all players as opposed to the use of heavy-handed regulatory approaches.
Quality assurance agencies: Creating a conducive environment for academic integrity AUTHOR
None Academic integrity is a key measure of the quality, efficiency and competitiveness of higher education systems. This article explores how a quality assurance agency can foster a conducive environment for academic quality and integrity. A self-study methodology was used, with a focus on the insights and experiences of the Zimbabwe Council for Higher Education over a 10-year period. The findings show that by assuming an innovative and transformational leadership role in instilling a culture of self-evaluation, as well as maintaining its own integrity, an external quality assurance agency can improve academic integrity. The article adds value to the existing knowledge by advancing the higher education ecosystem approach as an integrity-based panacea and conducive way to induce integrity to flow from all players as opposed to the use of heavy-handed regulatory approaches. Significance: • This article highlights the importance of academic integrity and situates quality assurance agencies as playing a central role in fostering academic integrity.
Higher Learning Research Communications
The post-1980s changes in the global higher education landscape have triggered a burgeoning of incidents of academic corruption in higher education institutions. Since 2000, the discourse on how to combat academic corruption has gained traction in higher education and quality assurance is advanced as one of the strategies for fighting corruption in higher education. In 2016, UNESCO (and the Council for Higher Education Accreditation) issued a “wakeup call” to quality assurance systems to take up a leading role in the battle against academic corruption. However, a dearth of empirical and conceptual studies on how the quality assurance systems, in general, and external quality assurance systems, in particular, can take up a leading role in the crusade against academic corruption exists. This conceptual paper, using the crime-punishment model as an analytical lens, explores how the national quality assurance agencies (and systems) can exercise the leadership role in combating academic ...
Framework of Quality Assurance in American Higher Education-An Overview
2016
One of the hallmarks of American higher education has been its quality. In the U.S.A colleges and universities are under constant pressure to strive to make their programs career oriented so as to meet the changing needs of the industry and society. The accreditation process of colleges and universities in the U.S.A is non-governmental operation. As result colleges and universities fiercely compete in the market of higher education. Institutional autonomy allows them to change their curriculum to inculcate and incubate entrepreneurial culture through their various programs. It is no accident that many American universities dominate the World University Rankings. There is a lot of discourse in academia that an educated workforce is essential for a prosperous and sustainable economy. This has lead to heightened policy interest in higher education in American universities. This paper uses various resources, data and facts to discuss the accreditation process in the U.S.A. The main focu...
2019
A global study conducted during 2017-18 for the Council for Higher Education Accreditation International Quality Group (CHEA/CIQG) builds on the Advisory Statement for Effective International Practice, Combatting Corruption and Enhancing Integrity: A Contemporary Challenge for the Quality and Credibility of Higher Education (Advisory Statement) by IIEP / UNESCO and CIQG (IIEP & CIQG 2016). This study captured information about actions and responses of accreditation and quality assurance bodies (AQABs) to address different forms of corruption in higher education. Results, recommendations and conclusions based on the findings from the study are presented in the main report, targeting people interested in quality and standards and concerned with discouraging corruption in higher education. The findings are specifically addressed to organisations with responsibility for assuring quality and integrity of education or research, and those responsible for overseeing and funding their operation. “Corruption” is a very broad term with many connotations and interpretations. We have adopted a rather narrower interpretation of the definition included in the Advisory Statement (IIEP &CIQG 2016: 1). Most examples of corruption in this study focus on intentional actions of individuals or groups rather than misconduct through accident, incompetence or ignorance.
Leveraging Institutional Integrity for the Betterment of Education
Handbook of Academic Integrity, 2016
In both research and practice, the topic of academic integrity is often approached negatively, as if it were synonymous (rather than antithetical) to academic fraud. This chapter, the first in a section dedicated to positive approaches to academic integrity, posits that academic integrity should be conceived of as integral to every goal in education from improving assessments and student performance to increasing retention, conducting research, diversifying, raising funds, becoming accredited, and competing in national and international rankings. Adopting this perspective, however, is only possible when integrity is positioned as central to the international system of education. This chapter articulates this position, with support from the literature on institutional integrity and human behavior, and then describes how educational institutions must address cheating and plagiarism as a systemic rather than individual conduct challenge if they truly wish to leverage institutional integrity for the betterment of education.
Assuring Quality amidst Political Intrigue in Higher Education Institutions
East African Journal of Education Studies
This article provides an anatomical analysis of the political intrigue within quality assurance and management mechanisms of higher education institutions in East Africa. Actionable strategies are hence proposed for circumventing the negative effects of such intrigue in order to ensure quality service delivery within the institutions while respecting the need for diversity and innovative practices in research and education. We recognize that the primary responsibility for quality assurance and quality management lies with the higher education institutions themselves, rather than with any outside body. The article therefore discusses issues of autonomy internal to the institutions and those external - between the institutions and regulatory cum oversight bodies that have perpetually riddled the efficiency of quality enhancement. The article draws its data and information from international, national, and institutional policies as well as refereed studies on quality assurance and qual...
ACADEMIC AND INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY – CAN'T HAVE ONE WITHOUT THE OTHER
Academic integrity has long been a concern at institutions of learning across the Globe. With the worldwide, accelerated, proliferation of "American style", "Western/ liberal arts" education and the adherent quest on the part of many institutions to seek and secure international accreditation, the issue of academic integrity has received more attention than ever before. While certain problems with honesty in academic conduct among students have been acknowledged for some time and remedies sought to combat issues of dishonesty, the issue of the integrity of the institutions themselves -be it their operating procedures, oversight of their teaching corps, researchers, staff members, remains underemphasized. Similarly, institutional integrity manifested as the underpinning force and structure that is meant to foster, enhance and enforce integrity has received scant attention. Unfortunately, what ought to have become a natural tendency for institutions to provide environments, that would make integrity and ethical behavior part of their institutional DNA seems to be lagging behind other priorities. "Academic Integrity" is so much more than punishing students caught plagiarizing. This discussion will point to flaws in the institutional underpinnings required to ensure and promote institutional honesty and integrity and points to areas that an institution can focus on to foster and require integrity THROUGHOUT the organization. It discusses some of the dilemmas found in any institution, and some that may be particular to certain locales and suggests practical steps that can be taken to bring each institution and the field of education a step closer to real integrity in the hallowed halls.
2019
This report sets out the results from a study conducted during 2017-18 for the Council for Higher Education Accreditation / CHEA International Quality Group (CHEA/CIQG). This study builds on recommendations from the IIEP/UNESCO and CHEA/CIQG Advisory Statement prepared by Sir John Daniel (IIEP & CIQG 2016), consolidating contributions from a panel of expert witnesses1. The study was designed to capture information about actions and responses of accreditation and quality assurance bodies (AQABs) for addressing different forms of corruption in higher education. The results, recommendations and conclusions in this report are based on the findings of the study.