Bloch Werdenberg Erhardt 2006_Pollination crisis in Dianthus carthusianorum? (original) (raw)

Why flower visitation is a poor proxy for pollination: measuring single-visit pollen deposition, with implications for pollination networks and conservation

Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2013

1. The relative importance of specialized and generalized plant-pollinator relationships is contentious, yet analyses usually avoid direct measures of pollinator quality (effectiveness), citing difficulties in collecting such data in the field and so relying on visitation data alone. 2. We demonstrate that single-visit deposition (SVD) of pollen on virgin stigmas is a practical measure of pollinator effectiveness, using 13 temperate and tropical plant species. For each flower the most effective pollinator measured from SVD was as predicted from its pollination syndrome based on traditional advertisement and reward traits. Overall, c. 40% of visitors were not effective pollinators (range 0-78% for different flowers); thus, flower-pollinator relationships are substantially more specialized than visitation alone can reveal. 3. Analyses at species level are crucial, as significant variation in SVD occurred within both higher-level taxonomic groups (genus, family) and within functional groups. 4. Other measures sometimes used to distinguish visitors from pollinators (visit duration, frequency, or feeding behaviour in flowers) did not prove to be suitable proxies. 5. Distinguishing between 'pollinators' and 'visitors' is therefore crucial, and true 'pollination networks' should include SVD to reveal pollinator effectiveness (PE). Generating such networks, now underway, could avoid potential misinterpretations of the conservation values of flower visitors, and of possible extinction threats as modelled in existing networks.

Mechanisms of pollination : quantifying insect and plant contributions

2018

Global agricultural production is reliant on insect-mediated pollination, which is largely provided by the European honey bee (Apis mellifera L.). Recent concern about the health of honey bees has raised significant concern about the future of food production and, as a result, alternate pollinators have been explored to provide these services. However, identifying which insect species are efficient pollinators of a particular plant species is challenging and labor-intensive. Additionally, even if an alternate pollinator is identified, its services may be insufficient to prevent pollination failure, which may be due to other factors. This thesis explores different measures that can be used to assess a species' effectiveness as a pollinator and the causes of pollination failure. Particularly, it addresses four main questions: 1) whether insect behavior or pollen transport can be used to predict single-visit pollen deposition (and thus pollinator efficiency) in four vegetable seed ...

Pollinators, Flowering Plants, and Conservation Biology

BioScience, 1997

ore than a century ago, Darwin (lg59) observed that "the number of bumblebees in any district depends in a great measure upon the number of fieldmice, which destroy their combs and nests ... che number of mice is largely Jependent, as everyone knows, on the number of cats .. .it is quite credible that the presence of a feline animal in large numbers in a district might uetermine, through the intervention first of mice and then of bees, the frequency of certain flowers in that district!" (p.-125). Dar-\'{in recoglllzed the importance of interactions among organisms, specifically the role that pollinators play as links in communities. Yet, almost 140 years later, our understanding of pollination interactions is still rudimentary. The extent of dependence and linkage in pollination sys-Carol Ann Kt'arns is an instructor in Environmental, Population, and Organismic Biology and assistant director of the Wil-Jiams Village Residential Academic Program in environmental science, Campus Box 334, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309. Her interests are in pollination of montane and alpine plants, plant pOPlllation genetics, and conservation biology. David William Inouy~ is an associate professor at the University of Maryland in both the Zoology andPJant Biology departments, College Park, MD 20742. He also directs the graduate program in Snst<"linable Development and Conservation Biology at the University of Maryland and conducts long-term studies of plants and insects at the Rocky f"vlountain Biological Laboratory, Crested Entre, CO 81224.

A global test of the pollination syndrome hypothesis

2009

Pollination syndromes' are suites of phenotypic traits hypothesized to reflect convergent adaptations of flowers for pollination by specific types of animals. They were first developed in the 1870s and honed during the mid 20th Century. In spite of this long history and their central role in organizing research on plant -pollinator interactions, the pollination syndromes have rarely been subjected to test. The syndromes were tested here by asking whether they successfully capture patterns of covariance of floral traits and predict the most common pollinators of flowers. † Methods Flowers in six communities from three continents were scored for expression of floral traits used in published descriptions of the pollination syndromes, and simultaneously the pollinators of as many species as possible were characterized. † Key Results Ordination of flowers in a multivariate 'phenotype space' defined by the syndromes showed that almost no plant species fall within the discrete syndrome clusters. Furthermore, in approximately two-thirds of plant species, the most common pollinator could not be successfully predicted by assuming that each plant species belongs to the syndrome closest to it in phenotype space. † Conclusions The pollination syndrome hypothesis as usually articulated does not successfully describe the diversity of floral phenotypes or predict the pollinators of most plant species. Caution is suggested when using pollination syndromes for organizing floral diversity, or for inferring agents of floral adaptation. A fresh look at how traits of flowers and pollinators relate to visitation and pollen transfer is recommended, in order to determine whether axes can be identified that describe floral functional diversity more successfully than the traditional syndromes.

Flower traits, habitat, and phylogeny as predictors of pollinator service: a plant community perspective

Ecological Monographs, 2019

Pollinator service is essential for successful sexual reproduction and long-term population persistence of animal-pollinated plants, and innumerable studies have shown that insufficient service by pollinators results in impaired sexual reproduction ("pollen limitation"). Studies directly addressing the predictors of variation in pollinator service across species or habitats remain comparatively scarce, which limits our understanding of the primary causes of natural variation in pollen limitation. This paper evaluates the importance of pollinationrelated features, evolutionary history, and environment as predictors of pollinator service in a large sample of plant species from undisturbed montane habitats in southeastern Spain. Quantitative data on pollinator visitation were obtained for 191 insect-pollinated species belonging to 142 genera in 43 families, and the predictive values of simple floral traits (perianth type, class of pollinator visitation unit, and visitation unit dry mass), phylogeny, and habitat type were assessed. A total of 24,866 pollinator censuses accounting for 5,414,856 flower-minutes of observation were conducted on 510 different dates. Flowering patch and single flower visitation probabilities by all pollinators combined were significantly predicted by the combined effects of perianth type (open vs. restricted), class of visitation unit (single flower vs. flower packet), mass of visitation unit, phylogenetic relationships, and habitat type. Pollinator composition at insect order level varied extensively among plant species, largely reflecting the contrasting visitation responses of Coleoptera, Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Lepidoptera to variation in floral traits. Pollinator composition had a strong phylogenetic component, and the distribution of phylogenetic autocorrelation hotspots of visitation rates across the plant phylogeny differed widely among insect orders. Habitat type was a key predictor of pollinator composition, as major insect orders exhibited decoupled variation across habitat types in visitation rates. Comprehensive pollinator sampling of a regional plant community has shown that pollinator visitation and composition can be parsimoniously predicted by a combination of simple floral features, habitat type, and evolutionary history. Ambitious community-level studies can help to formulate novel hypotheses and questions, shed fresh light on long-standing controversies in pollination research (e.g., "pollination syndromes"), and identify methodological cautions that should be considered in pollination community studies dealing with small, phylogenetically biased plant species samples.

Pollination ecology of a plant in its native and introduced areas

Acta Oecologica, 2014

Entomophilous and obligate out-crossing non-native plants need to become well integrated in the resident plantepollinator network to set seeds and become established. However, it is largely unknown how pollination patterns differ between native ranges and those where plants have been introduced. We compared the identity, abundance and visitation rates of pollinators, insect pollen loads, pollen deposition on stigmas, and fruit and seed sets of Hedysarum coronarium, an entomophilous short lived Nfixing perennial, in populations from native and introduced ranges in Spain (South of mainland Spain and Menorca Island, respectively). In both areas, Hedysarum was visited by a similar number of species, mainly hymenopterans; seven species were common between native and introduced areas. However, pollinator richness, abundance, and visits per flower were greater in the native than in the introduced range, as were fruit and seed sets. Hedysarum pollen loads on stigmas and on Apis mellifera, the most common pollinator, did not differ between areas. Lower abundance of pollinators might be causing lower visitation rates, and to some extent reducing Hedysarum fruit and seed sets in the introduced area. Our biogeographical approach shows that integration of a non-native plant in a resident pollinator network does not prevent pollen limitation in the introduced area. Therefore, despite being necessary, pollination mutualistic relationships might not be the key for non-native plant establishment success in the introduced area.

Pollination ecology in the 21st Century: key questions for future research

Journal of Pollination …, 2011

To inspire new ideas in research on pollination ecology, we list the most important unanswered questions in the field. This list was drawn up by contacting 170 scientists from different areas of pollination ecology and asking them to contribute their opinion on the greatest knowledge gaps that need to be addressed. Almost 40% of them took part in our email poll and we received more than 650 questions and comments, which we classified into different categories representing various aspects of pollination research. The original questions were merged and synthesised, and a final vote and ranking led to the resultant list. The categories cover plant sexual reproduction, pollen and stigma biology, abiotic pollination, evolution of animal-mediated pollination, interactions of pollinators and floral antagonists, pollinator behaviour, taxonomy, plant-pollinator assemblages, geographical trends in diversity, drivers of pollinator loss, ecosystem services, management of pollination, and conservation issues such as the implementation of pollinator conservation. We focused on questions that were of a broad scope rather than casespecific; thus, addressing some questions may not be feasible within single research projects but constitute a general guide for future directions. With this compilation we hope to raise awareness of pollination-related topics not only among researchers but also among non-specialists including policy makers, funding agencies and the public at large.

Pollination: A threatened vital biodiversity service to humans and the environment

2010

Pollination is one major biodiversity service that cannot be adequately quantified economically yet the variety of approaches nature has engaged to accomplish it is hardly appreciated. In this review, the types and agents of pollination, faunal and floral architectural and behavioural adaptations and special rare cases of pollination syndromes are highlighted. Anthropogenic roles that have resulted of threats to pollination and pollinators were identified as habitat fragmentation and loss, deforestation, desertification, industrial and infrastructural development. These eventually impinge on the unique ecological and economic services that pollination renders to sustain life on planet earth.

Pollination syndromes in a specialised plant-pollinator interaction: does floral morphology predict pollinators in Calceolaria

Pollination syndromes are defined as suites of floral traits evolved in response to selection imposed by a particular group of pollinators (e.g., butterflies, hummingbirds, bats). Although numerous studies demonstrated their occurrence in plants pollinated by radically different pollinators, it is less known whether it is possible to identify them within species pollinated by one functional pollinator group. In such a framework , we expect floral traits to evolve also in response to pollinator subgroups (e.g., species, genera) within that unique functional group. On this, specialised pollination systems represent appropriate case studies to test such expectations. Calceolaria is a highly diversified plant genus pollinated by oil-collecting bees in genera Centris and Chalepogenus. Variation in floral traits in Calceolaria has recently been suggested to reflect adaptations to pollinator types. However, to date no study has explicitly tested that observation. In this paper, we quantitatively test that hypothesis by evaluating the presence of pollination syndromes within the specialised pollination system formed by several Calceolaria and their insect pollinators. To do so, we use multivari-ate approaches and explore the structural matching between the morphology of 10 Calceolaria taxa and that of their principal pollinators. Our results identify morphological matching between floral traits related to access to the reward and insect traits involved in oil collection, confirming the presence of pollinator syndromes in Calceo-laria. From a general perspective, our findings indicate that the pollination syndrome concept can be also extended to the intra-pollinator group level.