Comparison in the incidence of anorectal malformations between a first- and third-world referral center (original) (raw)

The spectrum of anorectal malformations in Africa

Pediatric Surgery International, 2008

Anorectal malformations (ARM) remain a significant birth defect with geographic variation in incidence, individual phenotypes and regional geographic subtypes. Although early studies indicated a low incidence in Black patients, there is a great paucity of knowledge as to the types, frequency and incidence of ARMs encountered in the African continent and their associated anomalies. Current evidence suggests a significant clinical load. This study set out to evaluate ARM in Southern and other parts of Africa to define the clinical load of ARM. We retrospectively collected data on 1,401 ARM patients from six South African Paediatric Surgical units plus representative samples from five other African countries from West, Central and Southern Africa. Data included ethnic group, age, gender as well as the anatomical pathology, classification and presence or absence of associated anomalies. ARM

Management of Anorectal Malformation: Experience from Ethiopia

Annals of African Surgery

Background: Anorectal malformations are among the most common congenital malformation seen in children. There is paucity of data regarding the incidence and treatment outcome of this disease from Ethiopia. Methods: This is a retrospective review of patients treated for ARM at the TASH from March 2010-February 2014. Relevant statistical analysis was done and the results presented in tables and graphs. Results: Six patients (6%) presented at early neonatal age (before the age of 4 days) and 14 (14%) presented between 4 days and one month. A total of 57 associated congenital malformations were diagnosed in 44/99(44%) patients. The two most common type of ARM diagnosed among the female patients were rectovestibular fistula which occurred in 39/56 (70%) and

Pitfalls and technical errors in the first approach to neonates with anorectal malformations in a non-specialist context: can we do any better? A review from three Eastern African Centres

Introduction: In sub-Saharan Africa, Anorectal malformations (ARM) are the most frequent cause of neonatal obstruction. Referral to a Pediatric Surgeon is frequently delayed. The first treatment is often delivered at not specialist level and mismanagement may result. Aim: To study ARM patients referred beyond neonatal period and managed at a non-specialist level. Materials and Methods: One hundred and thirty patients were included (M/F ratio 63/67) among 144 admitted to three Eastern African Hospitals with Pediatric Surgical facilities. Demographics, type of anomaly, delay on referral, previous management, most commonly observed errors are reported. Results: The Mean age at referral was 23 months (range five weeks-23 years). Colostomy was the most frequent surgery (92 cases). Stomas often did not follow the recommended criteria. Ten per cent were not on the sigmoid, and 35% were not divided. "Loop" or "double-barrel" colostomies did not exclude the distal loop. Inverted (10,5%), prolapsed stomas (7,5%), short distal loop (16%) were observed. Twenty-four cases (26%) needed redo. Primary perineal exploration in eight patients resulted in incontinence. Conclusions: Investments on training practitioners, acting at District/Rural level, and closer links with tertiary centres are recommended to avoid ARM mismanagement and delayed referral to a Specialist.

Outcome and Complications of Anorectal Malformations

IOSR Journals, 2019

Anorectal Malformation [ARM] is a relatively common, complex anomaly to treat, improvement in management has improved life style of ARM child. We have studied every case of ARM admitted in GMKMCH between January 2012 and December 2016 (total 81 ). Children admitted are first stabilized and examined clinically after 24 hours subjected to invertogram and treated according to type of anomaly. Male babies with low anomaly are treated with anoplasty. Female babies are subjected to posterior trans position of anus at 3 months of age. High and intermediate anomalies are treated with 3 stage procedures. It was found that ARM is common in low socio economic group with equal gender incidence. Half of the cases are associated with other anomalies which is most common cause of death. Laparoscopic Assisted Anorectoplasty [LAARP] is better for high ARM and Posterior Sagital Anorectoplasty [PSARP] for intermediate ARM. Functional outcome of low ARM is good compared to high and intermediate ARM

Prevalence and survival of patients with anorectal malformations: A population-based study

Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 2019

Background: Anorectal malformations (ARMs) are the most frequent congenital intestinal anomalies. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of anorectal defects between 1981 and 2014 and to evaluate patients' survival. Methods: A population-based study using data collected by an Italian, regional registry of birth defects and by the local Pediatric Surgery Units. Results: A total of 428 individuals with ARM were identified, with an overall prevalence of 3.09 per 10,000 births. Characteristics associated with decreased survival were low birth weight (b 2500 g) (HR 6.4; 95% CI, 2.3-17.9), the presence of two or more additional major defects (HR 7.9; 95% CI, 2.2-27.8), and birth before year 2000 (HR 4.7; 95% CI, 1.8-11.8). The 10-year survival probability was 100% for individuals with isolated ARM, regardless of their birth weight. Survival of patients with non-isolated ARM varied according to their year of birth and birth weight: 73.3% (≥2500 g) and 23.8% (b2500 g) in children born before 2000; 97.9% (≥2500 g) and 68.8% (b2500 g) in children born after year 2000. Conclusions: This study found a significant improvement in the survival of individuals with anorectal malformations over the past decades and identified the strongest predictors of mortality. Level of evidence (prognosis study): Level II.

Anorectal malformations: Early outcome analysis in a tertiary care center in India

Journal of Neonatal Surgery, 2021

Background: Delayed diagnosis, referral, and presence of associated anomalies may influence the outcome of Anorectal malformations (ARM). The aim of this study was to analyze the early outcomes (1 month postoperatively) of ARM presenting in the neonatal period. Methods: A prospective study was carried out in our tertiary care teaching institute from December 2018 to March 2020. All neonates admitted in the NICU with ARM were studied. Results: There were 315 neonates; out of these, 236 (74.92%) were male and 79 (25.07%) were female. High ARM (HARM) was present in 265 (84.13%) and low ARM (LARM) in 50 (15.87%). Associated congenital anomalies were noted in 121 (38.41%). Major associated anomalies consisted of gastrointestinal (GIT) (41.32%), oesophageal (31.4%), and genitourinary (GU) (19.83%). Out of 306 procedures for ARM, 196 (64.05%) neonates underwent left transverse colostomy (LTC). The most frequent postoperative complications were thrombocytopenia (115) followed by sepsis (98)...

Factors affecting the outcome of neonates with anorectal malformation in a developing country

2021

Background: The survival and outcome of neonates with anorectal malformations (ARM) have much improved in the developed countries due to optimal perioperative and postoperative care but in developing countries, sepsis, low birth weight, delayed presentation, and lack of intensive care for neonates are still important in affecting the outcome. This study was carried out to evaluate factors of poor outcome (mortality) in neonates with ARM. Method: This is a prospective analytical study. A total of 44 consecutive neonates with Anorectal malformations (ARM) presenting to the Department of Pediatric Surgery, The Children’s Hospital, Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, were included. Variables studied included age at presentation, gender, birth weight, type of malformation, sepsis at presentation, type of surgery performed, postoperative complications, and their relationship to the outcome. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 21. Results: A total of 44...

Survey on the management of anorectal malformations (ARM) in European pediatric surgical centers of excellence

Pediatric surgery international, 2015

Various management strategies for anorectal malformations (ARM) have been proposed. The aim of this study was to assess the current management in centers of excellence in Europe. An online survey on the pre- and post-operative concepts, surgical techniques, and the management of complications was sent to the representative experts of 28 selected European centers of pediatric surgery with special expertise in the treatment of ARM. The survey was completed by 25 experts from 14 countries. To assess the level of the rectal pouch in newborns 60 % of participants perform a prone cross-table X-ray and 52 % ultrasound. If an ostomy is required, 84 % create divided Peña stomas. Primary repair in the newborn period is performed in females with rectoperineal (92 %), rectovestibular (60 %), and no fistula (32 %), and in males with rectoperineal (92 %), rectourinary (17 %) and no fistula (38 %). For 68 % of surgeons, the PSARP is the preferred surgical approach for "low" malformations...

Management of anorectal malformation: Changing trend over two decades in Zaria, Nigeria

African Journal of Paediatric Surgery, 2011

Background: Anorectal malformation is a common congenital defect and its management has evolved over the years. This is a review of the trend in the management of this condition in a major paediatric surgical centre in Nigeria over two decades. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 295 patients with anorectal malformations managed from January 1988 to December 2007 was carried out. Results: There were 188 boys and 107 girls aged 1 day-9 years (median 8 years) at presentation. There were 73 (54.5%) and 106 (65.8%) emergency operations in groups A and B, respectively. There were 61 (45.5%) and 55 (34.2%) elective operations in groups A and B, respectively. Regarding treatment, in group A, patients requiring colostomy had transverse loop colostomy, while in group B, sigmoid (usually divided) colostomy was preferred. The definitive surgery done during the two periods were: group A: cutback anoplasty 29 (47.5%), anal transplant 5 (8.2%), sacroabdominoperineal pullthrough (Stephen's operation) 6 (9.5%) and others 21 (34.4%). In group B, posterior sagittal anorectoplasty (PSARP) 46 (83.7%), anal transplant 1 (1.8%), posterior sagittal anorectovaginourethroplasty (PSARVUP) 2 (3.6%) and anal dilatation 6 (10.9%) were done. Early colostomy-related complication rates were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The overall late complication rate was 65.5% in group A and 16.4% in group B (P < 0.05). The mortality was 25 (18.6%) in group A compared to 17 (10.6%) in group B (P < 0.05). Conclusion: There have been significant changes in the management of anorectal malformations in this centre in the last two decades, resulting in improved outcomes.