The Subjects of Labor Law: 'Employees' and Other Workers (original) (raw)
Who is an employee? Which workers ought to be covered by the protective panoply offered by labor law? These are questions with a long history. In the current contribution we consider them from a comparative perspective. Our aim is to highlight similarities and differences between different legal systems. This cross-national analysis can in turn assist the national analyses. Understanding how others have been approaching the same problem can help us better understand our own legal system, including in terms of its historical development and in identifying shortcoming, inconsistencies and hidden assumptions. Understanding to what extent the problem and solutions are universal can also assist us in identifying the normative foundations behind the law. We start with a brief overview of the tests used in different countries to decide if one is an employee (and covered by labor law), showing some points of diversity but for the most part significant similarities, with a trend towards greater convergence. We then turn to examine some relatively recent developments in different legal systems through three prisms. First we discuss the response in different countries to employers’ evasion attempts. We show how in some systems courts and legislatures remain inactive in the face of evasion, and the stagnation of the law leaves room to massive misclassification of employees as independent contractors. In other countries, on the other hand, creative solutions have been used to contain or minimize this problem. Next we consider the dialogue between the judiciary and the legislature in determining who is an employee. We show how in some countries, judicial approaches to the problem have triggered a legislative response, while in others the legislature remains silent, possibly to signal approval or simply out of disinterest. Finally, we examine the breaking of the binary divide between employees and independent contractors. We show that a third (intermediate) category has been added in an increasing number of countries, as a response to similar problems in classifying workers who share only some of the characteristics of employees. In the conclusion we return to reflect on the issues of diversity vs. convergence, in light of the developments discussed in the previous parts.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
The legal and jurisprudential evolution of the notion of employee
european labour law journal, 2020
The essay analyses the concept of employed worker in the light of the expansive trend of labour law. Two perspectives are investigated. The first concerns the revisiting of the concept of employed worker through the interpretation of jurisprudence. Comparative analysis demonstrates a tendency, not univocal but prevalent, of jurisprudence to broaden the notion of subordinate work, which manifests itself through purposive interpretation techniques. The other perspective is that of the creation of intermediate categories, such as that of 'worker' in the UK or that of 'parasubordinato' work in Italy, or even the notion of 'economically dependent selfemployment' (Spain, Germany), to which selectively apply some protections of subordinate work. The current challenge of labour law is therefore to be able to respond to changes in the production reality, exemplified by work through a digital platform, to provide adequate protection for new forms of work and new ways in which subordination is expressed.
The legal concept of employment: marginalizing workers
2002
The topic of this report is the legal concept of employment because employment is the most important concept for determining the legal protection associated with different forms of paid work. Employment establishes the boundary between the economic zone of commercial relations, entrepreneurship, and competition, on the one hand, and the economic zone of labour protection, economic dependency, and regulation, on the other. This report focuses on how the law distinguishes between employment and self-employment, placing emphasis on own-account self-employment, where the self-employed person does not employ other employees. This case study is selected because it provides an opportunity to examine the normative question of whether labour protection ought to be limited to only certain forms of paid work. Moreover, the dramatic growth of self-employment since the 1980s in Canada raises important questions about the operation of labour markets, whether self-employment is coterminous with entrepreneurship, and the adequacy of prevailing legal tests of employment status for determining the personal scope of labour protection and social benefits. Employing a multidisciplinary approach to examine the distinction between employees and the self-employed, the report is divided in four parts. Part One canvasses the sociological, legal, and statistical bases for the distinction. Part Two provides a portrait of the self-employed in Canada, drawing on public-use micro-data from Statistics Canada, and places it in an international context. Shifting to legal analysis, Part Three evaluates the legal history of the scope of employment and challenges the conventional legal narrative that assumes the distinction between employment (a contract of service) and independent contracting (a contract for services) is a deeply embedded and long-standing one. Building upon this revised account, Part Four provides an overview of the different legal definitions of "employee" operating in the iv various regimes of employment regulation across Canada, including social insurance and revenue-raising regimes. Part Five addresses the appropriate personal scope of labour protection in light of the conceptual, statistical, historical, and legal analyses, and provides recommendations for law reform. The report concludes that it is necessary to abandon the distinction between employees and independent contractors for the purpose of determining the personal scope of labour protection and that such laws will have to be redesigned in order to accommodate different forms of paid work.
In recent years, scholars have raised a number of arguments in opposition to the continued use of the employee/independent contractor distinction (and the concept of employee) in law. Four arguments merit attention: that the concept of employee serves to exclude some people who are not employees neither independent contractors; that basic assumptions at the heart of the distinction concerning inequality of bargaining power are no longer valid, if they ever have been; that the concept of employee is vague and indefinable; and that the classification into groups of workers is too rigid and should give way to context-specific determinations of the scope of each regulation. The purpose of this article is to examine the merits of these four arguments. It will be shown that none of them can justify abandoning the concept. At the same time, they all provide important and useful insights on the way this concept should be practically used.
Employment Law: The Employee vs. Independent Contractor Dichotomy
2018
Part of the Judges Commons This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Judges' Book by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact
This article provides an analysis and critique of current legislative and judicial approaches to defining employment status. The backdrop for the analysis is the Agency Work Directive (AWD) 2008, and UK Regulations that implement it. It explores the significant changes and growing complexity in employment relationships themselves, with multilateral forms becoming more prominent. The article offers a new typology of employment relationships to reflect these changes. Case law from fiscal and company law as well as employment law is drawn on to illustrate some of the problems for law and policy of complex employment relationships. It is argued that law has failed to create a coherent approach to defining status and, specifically, that it has failed to appreciate the characteristics of emerging forms of self-employment, treating it as merely a default category of employment. The major implications for accessing employment rights are considered and the article concludes by making a series of recommendations for reform.
Diversity of employment contracts and use of the law
2005
From the construction of a French data base of 309 employment contracts, we analyse current practices in firms, their manpower management methods and their use of the law in the drafting of employment contracts. We present a typology of ‘employment contracts' based on different indicators characterising the terms of the employment relationship (flexibility, employee's subordination to the firm, employee's individual
The logic of employment systems
Social Differentiation and Stratification, 1996
It has now been about 20 years since sociologists have begun to take the problem of the structure of work seriously in empirical research on stratification. The "new structuralism" has tried to embed the employment relation in larger units of analysis, such as organizations, sectors, classes, labor market segments, and even nation-states (for some examples, see ) has tried to view the production of labor relations as the interaction between groups of laborers and employers with varying amounts of resources.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.