Proximal Femur Size and Geometry in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients (original) (raw)

The Relationship between Femoral Morphotype and Femoral Component Design

HIP International, 1995

RESEARCH ARTICLE Proximal Femur Size and Geometry in Cementless Total Hip

2016

Influence of Stem Size on Clinical Outcome of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Cementless Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Components

vivek mohan

Journal of Arthroplasty, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Fill, fit and conformation - an anatomical and morphometric study of a hip component in total hip arthroplasty (Rippen-Link)

Vincenzo Denaro

2000

View PDFchevron_right

Native femoral anteversion should not be used as reference in cementless total hip arthroplasty with a straight, tapered stem: a retrospective clinical study

Benjamin Craiovan

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

A Quantitative Analysis of Bone Support Comparing Cementless Tapered and Distal Fixation Total Hip Replacements1

Cecil Rorabeck

The Journal of …, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Morphological Study of the Newly Designed Cementless Femoral Stem

Ahmad Zulkifly

BioMed Research International, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

A quantitative analysis of bone support comparing cementless tapered and distal fixation total hip replacements

Cecil Rorabeck

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Long-term radiographic changes in cemented total hip arthroplasty with six designs of femoral components

Sophia Sangiorgio

Biomaterials, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Custom Cementless Femoral Stems in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Mark Dwyer

The Journal of Hip Surgery

View PDFchevron_right

Changes in Femoral Version During Implantation of Anatomic Stems: Implications on Stem Design

Justin Gerges

Journal of Arthroplasty, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Long term results of total hip arthroplasty with cemented and cementless tapered femoral component

Nimrod Snir

SICOT-J, 2023

View PDFchevron_right

A radiographic comparison of femoral offset after cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty

Amy Lindh, James Berstock

Hip International, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

A Comparison of Surgeon Estimation and Computed Tomographic Measurement of Femoral Component Anteversion in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty

Aamer Malik

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, American Volume, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

The anatomic basis for the concept of lateralized femoral stems

Philippe Massin

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Comparative Clinical-Radiological Analysis of First-Generation vs . Second-Generation Flat Cementless Femoral Stems

Pablino Spesot

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Anatomy of the proximal femoral medullary canal and fit and fill characteristics of cementless endoprosthetic stems

Heikki-Jussi Laine

2001

View PDFchevron_right

Inter-subject variability Effects on the primary stability of a short cementless femoral stem

Mamadou T Bah, Markus Heller

Journal of Biomechanics, 2015

View PDFchevron_right

Cemented collarless (exeter-CPT) versus cementless collarless (PCA) femoral components

Lars Weidenhielm

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Clinical experience with a proximally porous-coated second-generation cementless total hip prosthesis: Minimum 5-year follow-up

K. Krackow, David Hungerford

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

The Geometry of the Bone Structure Associated with Total Hip Arthroplasty

li zhihan

PLoS ONE

View PDFchevron_right

Bone Remodelling in a Conservative Femoral Component for Hip Replacement Surgery

Gordon Blunn

HIP International, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Seven-year Results of a Tapered, Titanium, Hydroxyapatite-Coated Cementless Femoral Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Jonathan Garino

Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Primary total hip arthroplasty without the use of bone cement: a 10-year follow-up of 157 hips

Wene Yang

Chang Gung Medical Journal, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

A Comparative Evaluation of Cadaveric and Composite Femur Models for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Anderson Adams

2015

View PDFchevron_right

Short vs Standard-Length Femoral Stems Cemented According to the “French Paradox”: A Matched Paired Prospective Study Using Ein Bild Roentgen Analyze Femoral Component at Two-Year Follow-Up

Pierre Laboudie

Journal of Arthroplasty, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Primary stability in cementless femoral stems: custom-made versus conventional femoral prosthesis

Wolfram Steens

Clinical Biomechanics, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Efforts to improve cementless femoral stems in THR

Brian McGrory

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004

View PDFchevron_right

Good stability of a cementless, anatomically designed femoral stem in aging women: a 9-year RSA study of 32 patients

Hannu T Aro

Acta Orthopaedica

View PDFchevron_right

The anatomically difficult primary total hip replacement: MEDIUM- TO LONG-TERM RESULTS USING A CEMENTLESS ODULAR STEM

William Walsh

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial

Konstantina Solou

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Mid-Term Study of Bone Remodeling After Femoral Cemented Stem Implantation: Comparison Between DXA and Finite Element Simulation

Sarai Rebollo, Sergio Gabarre, Antonio Herrera-Rodríguez

The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

Proximal Femur Size and Geometry in Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Patients (original) (raw)

Related papers