MULTIFACETED SANCTIONS IN CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE Security, Trade, Human Rights and Development. Rome, December 4 2015 (original) (raw)
Related papers
ECONOMIC SANCTIONS REVISITED: ADDITIONAL INSIGHTS INTO WHY THEY FAIL: iea economic afairs
Economic Affairs, 2010
Economic sanctions have a poor track record in achieving their objectives. In most cases, they are ineffective in bringing about policy change, cause increased suffering in the sanctioned country and reduce opportunities for business. This paper provides additional insights into why sanctions fail by examining two overlooked factors: power–dependency theory and pressure for political stability.
Routledge Handbook of Security Studies (2nd Ed.)
International sanctions have become a commonly used tool of statecraft on the international stage. The most comprehensive database compiling sanctions 'episodes' since 1914 notes that their number has nearly doubled in two decades, from 103 in 1985103 in to 204 in 2007103 in (Hufbauer et al. 2008. The growing importance of sanctions has generated a number of debates in scholarly and policy circles, the most famous asking whether economic sanctions 'work' or not. Other sub-debates have emerged over time, including the effectiveness of multilaterally imposed sanction regimes compared with unilateral sanctions, the right mixture of comprehensiveness and accuracy in selecting the targets of the sanction episode, or the unintended (and potentially counterproductive) effects of sanctions (Andreas 2005).
A Century of Economic Sanctions: A Field Revisited
2000
Printed in Sweden by Universitetstryckeriet, Uppsala 2000 Distributed by Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University Box 514, SE-751 20 Uppsala, Sweden Phone +46 (0)18-471 00 00 Fax +46 (0)18-69 51 02 E-mail: info@pcr.uu.se www.peace.uu.se
Towards a Definition of Economic Sanctions
2004
Scholars have long been groping for a definition of “economic sanctions” in order to distinguish the concept from other forms of international non-military coercion and identify the specific attributes of this complex human endeavour. Thus, various related terms have been used, which may or may not designate the same phenomenon: Economic aggression[1], economic warfare[2], economic coercion[3] and embargoes[4]. Regardless of whether the use of the term is always appropriate and whether all commentators do in fact mean the same thing, the expression ‘economic sanctions’ has increasingly been used since around 1990 as the generic label for various unilateral and multilateral measures of deprivation imposed on individual national economies. We will maintain this usage in order to avoid confusion.
Are Sanctions Working? An Analysis of International Economic Sanctions Policies
2023
Economic sanctions have been a key policy option in international relations over the last few centuries. They represent an important alternative to war, making them a popular policy. However, questions remain over whether they are a particularly effective option. This paper will seek to critically analyse the literature on policy success and failure to establish a framework through which international economic sanctions policy can be effectively analysed. This framework will then be applied to case studies of how economic sanctions policy has been applied in Iran and Russia. This paper will then add further depth to the analysis of sanctions by examining how the application of sanctions has affected sanction-sender nations, most particularly the United Kingdom and the European Union. This paper concludes that sanctions can be a useful and effective policy, but only where they are applied with clear, specific and reasonable policy aims.
Economic sanctions: the kinder, gentler alternative?
Medicine, conflict, and survival
Economic sanctions are often considered to be a legitimate, more peaceful alternative to war. Using examples, particularly that of Iraq, it is evident that this is not necessarily so. As attempts are made to design coercion on nation states short of war, we must heed these examples and consider sanctions as a form of siege warfare. This paper attempts to refine criteria to allow the imposition of sanctions. These would be similar to those allowing the imposition of war. In the realm of international governance, not only must sanctions be employed by the authority of international society, after other less coercive measures have been attempted, they must be supported by the people whom they are meant to protect, and efforts must be made to minimise and to monitor their consequences.
The Power and Consequences of International Sanctions
2020
The imposition of politically motivated restrictions on trade, financial flows, the ownership of assets, communication, or travel by governments – prominent forms of international sanctions applied in the recent past – are hotly debated issues of international politics. One of the main topics in these discussions is the question of the effects of sanctions. Are sanctions attaining what those mandating them aim for? Or do they primarily have other effects? Or no effects at all?
Economic Sanctions: A Modern Form of Reprisals
Progress Magazine, 2023
Trade embargoes and the cessation of capital and investment flows between the sender, and target countries are examples of economic sanctions. They are commonly used methods to maintain unanimously accepted diplomatic discourse between states. On the other hand, reprisal is an enforcement tactic in response to a state’s violation of international humanitarian law, which in itself is lawful to a very limited extent. In recent years, sanctions have done more harm than good. This article explores the use of economic sanctions in international relations as a means of reprisal – its moral and legal ramifications. The article would portray how economic sanctions are nothing but age-old reprisals that primarily affect the civilian population. Since the latter is not permissible under international law, and hence, economic sanctions should also be reconsidered.