Opening Science to Society: an interdisciplinary initiative for data sharing (original) (raw)
Related papers
Perspectives on Open Science and scientific data sharing:an interdisciplinary workshop
Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS / Istituto italiano di antropologia, 2014
Looking at Open Science and Open Data from a broad perspective. This is the idea behind "Scientific data sharing: an interdisciplinary workshop", an initiative designed to foster dialogue between scholars from different scientific domains which was organized by the Istituto Italiano di Antropologia in Anagni, Italy, 2-4 September 2013.We here report summaries of the presentations and discussions at the meeting. They deal with four sets of issues: (i) setting a common framework, a general discussion of open data principles, values and opportunities; (ii) insights into scientific practices, a view of the way in which the open data movement is developing in a variety of scientific domains (biology, psychology, epidemiology and archaeology); (iii) a case study of human genomics, which was a trail-blazer in data sharing, and which encapsulates the tension that can occur between large-scale data sharing and one of the boundaries of openness, the protection of individual data; (i...
Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions
PLoS ONE, 2011
Background: Scientific research in the 21st century is more data intensive and collaborative than in the past. It is important to study the data practices of researchers -data accessibility, discovery, re-use, preservation and, particularly, data sharing. Data sharing is a valuable part of the scientific method allowing for verification of results and extending research from prior results.
Open science, data sharing and solidarity: who benefits?
History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences
Research, innovation, and progress in the life sciences are increasingly contingent on access to large quantities of data. This is one of the key premises behind the “open science” movement and the global calls for fostering the sharing of personal data, datasets, and research results. This paper reports on the outcomes of discussions by the panel “Open science, data sharing and solidarity: who benefits?” held at the 2021 Biennial conference of the International Society for the History, Philosophy, and Social Studies of Biology (ISHPSSB), and hosted by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL).
Solving bottlenecks in data sharing in the life sciences
Human Mutation, 2012
The joint Open PHACTS/GEN2PHEN workshop on "Solving Bottlenecks in Data Sharing in the Life Sciences" was held in Volendam, the Netherlands, on September 19 and 20, 2011, and was attended by representatives from academia, industry, publishing, and funding agencies. The aim of the workshop was to explore the issues that influence the extent to which data in the life sciences are shared, and to explore sustainability scenarios that would enable and promote "open" data sharing. Several key challenges were identified and solutions to each of these were proposed.
PLoS ONE, 2013
Research on practices to share and reuse data will inform the design of infrastructure to support data collection, management, and discovery in the long tail of science and technology. These are research domains in which data tend to be local in character, minimally structured, and minimally documented. We report on a ten-year study of the Center for Embedded Network Sensing (CENS), a National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center. We found that CENS researchers are willing to share their data, but few are asked to do so, and in only a few domain areas do their funders or journals require them to deposit data. Few repositories exist to accept data in CENS research areas.. Data sharing tends to occur only through interpersonal exchanges. CENS researchers obtain data from repositories, and occasionally from registries and individuals, to provide context, calibration, or other forms of background for their studies. Neither CENS researchers nor those who request access to CENS data appear to use external data for primary research questions or for replication of studies. CENS researchers are willing to share data if they receive credit and retain first rights to publish their results. Practices of releasing, sharing, and reusing of data in CENS reaffirm the gift culture of scholarship, in which goods are bartered between trusted colleagues rather than treated as commodities.
Data Management and Data Sharing in Science and Technology Studies
Science, Technology, & Human Values
This paper presents reports on discussions among an international group of science and technology studies (STS) scholars who convened at the US National Science Foundation (January 2015) to think about data sharing and open STS. The first report, which reflects discussions among members of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S), relates the potential benefits of data sharing and open science for STS. The second report, which reflects discussions among scholars from many professional STS societies (i.e., European Association for the Study of Science and Technology [ EASST], 4S, Society for the History of Technology [ SHOT], History of Science Society [ HSS], and Philosophy of Science Association [ PSA]), focuses on practical and conceptual issues related to managing, storing, and curating STS data. As is the case for all reports of such open discussions, a scholar’s presence at the meeting does not necessarily mean that they agree with all aspects of the text to follow.
Open science, open data: Challenge and opportunity
Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, 2018
Today, one of the main narratives in science is making access to research data universal, especially studies funded with public resources, a common motivation that underlies the open access to scientific information movement that began in the late 1990s. Without losing sight of the fact that the opening of research data in Brazil is part of a recent discussion, its implementation is necessary, not only because this has to do with offering open access to the outcomes of public funding, but also to meeting the commitment to do science under the inspiration of an open philosophy, supported by the infinite possibilities of information and communication technologies, which encourage collaborative, shared production among researchers, especially through the reuse of data. In December 2017, after the 8th Luso-Brazilian Open Access Conference, which was held at its premises in Rio de Janeiro, the Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (Fiocruz) gave another unequivocal demonstration of its commitment to Open Science when it presented the Open science and open data: Mapping and analysis of policies, infrastructures, and strategies from a national and international perspective (Santos, Henning e Almeida, 2017) report on an analysis of international initiatives on policies, governance, and open data infrastructures as a result of the research carried out by the Working Group on Open Science, which has ties to the office of the vice president for Education, Information and Communication, in partnership with the Center for the Integration of Data and Knowledge in Health (Cidacs). The Cidacs, which is based in Fiocruz Bahia, is part of one of the institutional strategies to subsidize the formulation and implementation of a policy that guides the opening of scientific data. It conducts research, develops new investigative methodologies, and promotes professional and scientific training based on interdisciplinary projects grounded on the integration of large databases (big data) to expand the understanding of the population's health issues and to provide evidence to support decision-making in public policies. This study systematizes the experience of eight countries-Germany, Australia, Brazil, Canada, the United States, the Netherlands, Portugal, and the United Kingdom-and the initiatives promoted by the European Commission through its Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program to open data to society, aiming at the advancement of an open, collaborative, and shared science that guarantees the integrity of research and is coordinated with the social and economic sustainability of the nations. The Open science and open data: Mapping and analysis of policies, infrastructures, and strategies from a national and international perspective report is a part of the "