Minimally invasive techniques in the treatment of saphenous varicose veins (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2013
Background: Many case series have been published on treatments of varicose veins, but comparative randomized controlled trials remain sparse. Objective: To compare the anatomic success rate, frequency of major complications, and quality-of-life improvement of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS), and conventional surgery (CS), after 1-year follow-up. Methods: A total of 240 consecutive patients with primary symptomatic great saphenous vein reflux were randomized to EVLA, UGFS, or CS, consisting of high ligation and short stripping. Primary outcome was anatomic success defined as obliteration or absence of the treated vein on ultrasound examination after 1 year. Secondary outcomes were complications, improvement of the "C" class of the CEAP classification, and improvement of disease-specific (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire) and general (EuroQol 5) quality-of-life scores. Results: More than 80% of the study population was classified as C2 or C3 venous disease. After 1 year, the anatomic success rate was highest after EVLA (88.5%), followed by CS (88.2%) and UGFS (72.2%) (P < .001). The complication rate was low and comparable between treatment groups. All groups showed significant (P < .001) improvement of EuroQol 5 and Chronic Venous Insufficiency Quality-of-Life Questionnaire scores after therapy; 84.3% of all treated patients showed an improvement of the "C" of the CEAP classification. Conclusions: After 1-year follow-up, EVLA is as effective as CS and superior to UGFS according to occlusion on ultrasound duplex. Quality of life improves after treatment in all groups significantly. (J Vasc Surg
Endovenous Laser Ablation and Sclerotherapy for Treatment of Varicose Veins
Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery, 2008
Superficial venous insufficiency is a common problem associated with varicose veins. Venous insufficiency and varicose veins can be symptomatic, but more commonly they are a cosmetic concern. In this article, we discuss the relevant anatomy and pathophysiology of superficial venous insufficiency, review the current literature for varicose vein treatment, and cover the technical aspects of diagnosing and treating superficial venous insufficiency. Saphenofemoral junction incompetence with resultant greater saphenous vein reflux is the most common cause of varicose veins; because this condition constitutes the majority of patients encountered in practice, we will concentrate on this area. Endovenous laser ablation and sclerotherapy are covered, including patient workup and selection, procedure setup , and anesthesia.
Acta Radiologica, 2011
Background: Superficial venous insufficiency is a common problem associated with varicose veins. Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) and concomitant ultrasound (US)-guided foam sclerotherapy are recent treatment methods alternative to surgery in the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of EVLA and concomitant US-guided foam sclerotherapy prospectively in two different subgroups of the disease (isolated truncal vs. truncal with perforating vein insufficiency). Material and Methods: The study was approved by the institutional review board. Fifty-five patients with symptomatic saphenous vein insufficiency and varicose veins were included in the study. Seventy-three EVLA and concomitant foam sclerotherapy were performed for 60 lower extremities. To determine the severity of the venous disease, Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were carried out before and 6 months after the treatment. Patients were followed up clinically and with Doppler ultrasonography for 6 months after the procedures. Results: At the sixth month of the follow-up; the total occlusion rate for the saphenous veins was 98.64% (72/73), and re-canalization rate was 1.36% (1/73). The total occlusion rate for the perforating veins was 75% (18/24), re-canalization rate was 25% (6/24). There was no notable major complication. VCSS and VAS scores were decreased significantly following the treatment (p , 0.05). The patients who had isolated saphenous vein insufficiency (Group I: 36/60) and those who had saphenous and perforating vein reflux (Group II: 24/60) were compared. VAS scores were more prominently decreased after the treatment in the isolated saphenous vein insufficiency group (p , 0.05). VCSS were also decreased more prominently in Group I when compared to Group II. Conclusion: EVLA and concomitant US-guided foam sclerotherapy are effective, safe, and minimally invasive treatment options, yielding good cosmetic and clinical results in both isolated truncal and truncal with perforating vein insufficiency groups. However, clinical results and satisfaction of the patients were remarkably superior in cases with isolated truncal vein insufficiency compared to truncal and perforating vein insufficiency.
Annals of Vascular Surgery, 2013
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and short-term outcomes of endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) combined with pinhole high ligation (PHL) in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins. Methods: From February 2011 to May 2012, 200 patients with great saphenous varicose veins were treated using combined EVLT and PHL. Sixty-eight of them had concurrent TriVex suction. There were 118 men and 82 women with a median age of 61 (range 28e82) years. All patients had more than one of the following presentations, including lower extremity heaviness, pain, edema, varicose vein, skin changes, or ulceration. Based on the CEAP clinical classification, 20 patients had C2, 85 had C3, 48 had C4, 23 had C5, and 24 had C6 chronic venous disease. Ninety patients had VV involving the left lower extremity, 56 involving the right lower extremity, and 54 involving the bilateral lower extremities. Duplex ultrasound (US) was performed for all the 200 patients, and showed great saphenous valve dysfunction and reflux in 148 patients. Fiftytwo of the 200 patients had concurrent mild femoral vein reflux. Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was ruled out in all the patients. Results: Technical success rate of PHL and laser ablation was 100%. Median follow-up was 9 months, ranging from 3 to 20 months. Symptoms were resolved or significantly improved in all patients after surgery. The ulcers healed in 23 of the 24 patients (96%) within 3 months. Ten patients developed subcutaneous hematoma, and 8 had slightly worsening edema. Ten patients with complications of numbness due to saphenous nerve burning injury were treated with mecobalamin, and the numbness sensation improved within 1 month and disappeared within 3 months. Nine patients sustained saphenous vein thrombophlebitis postoperatively and were treated with ibuprofen and a heating pad. There was no recanalization of the great saphenous vein, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), or deaths in this group of patients. Conclusions: Combined EVLT and PHL are less invasive and are effective in the treatment of symptomatic great saphenous varicose veins. PHL prevents DVT, and significantly decreases recanalization of the great saphenous vein after endovenous laser ablation. Short-term outcomes have been satisfactory, but long-term follow-up is needed.
Suitability of Varicose Veins for Endovenous Treatments
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 2009
The aim of the study was to assess the suitability of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), endovenous laser ablation (EVLA), and foam sclerotherapy (FS) for patients with symptomatic varicose veins (VVs). The study comprised 403 consecutive patients with symptomatic VVs. Data on 577 legs from 403 consecutive patients with symptomatic VVs were collected for the year 2006. Median patient age was 55 years (interquartile range 45-66), and 62% patients were women. A set of criteria based on duplex ultrasonography was used to select patients for each procedure. Great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux was present in 77% (446 of 577) of legs. Overall, 328 (73%) of the legs were suitable for at least one of the endovenous options. Of the 114 legs with recurrent GSV reflux disease, 83 (73%) were suitable to receive endovenous therapy. Patients with increasing age were less likely to be suitable for endovenous therapy (P = 0.03). Seventy-three percent of patients with VVs caused by GSV incompetence are suitable for endovenous therapy.
Endovenous laser treatment for primary varicose veins
Acta chirurgica Belgica
Venous insufficiency of the lower extremities is a highly prevalent condition. Successful treatment of superficial venous insufficiency will most often necessitate treatment of the saphenofemoral junction incompetence with correction of saphenous vein reflux. In the majority of patients it concerns a reflux of the greater saphenous vein. The standard procedure consists of ligation and stripping of the greater saphenous vein combined with with additional phlebectomies or ligation of insufficient perforant veins if necessary. Although the standard procedure is widely known and accepted, the postoperative morbidity and postoperative limitations of activity are high. In this context minimally invasive percutaneous endovenous techniques were developed to improve the patients comfort and faster resumption of work. Among these, endovenous laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein is a relatively new procedure. Percutaneous introduction of a laser fiber into the incompetent vein and abla...
Endovenous laser ablation for great saphenous varicose veins
International Surgery Journal, 2019
Background: Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) is one of the most accepted treatment options for great saphenous varicose veins. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety EVLA in a 12 months follow-up. Methods: Patients with symptomatic great saphenous veins (GSV) reflux were undergo EVLA. The outcome measures the efficacy and safety along the follow up period (12 months). The efficacy assessed by measuring the occlusion rate of the GSV by duplex and by measuring the improvement in the mean venous clinical severity score (VCSS) by clinical examination. The safety assessed by clinical examination to detect the complications. Results: The rate of complete occlusion in the main trunk of the great saphenous vein was 34/35 (97.1%) at 6 and 12 months. The mean VCSS scores improved significantly after the procedure at 6 and 12 months. Complications detected within 1 st week as pigmentation in 3 patients, local hematoma in one patient, and paresthesia in one patient but all complications disappeared within 6 and 12 months. Conclusions: EVLA is an effective and safe procedure for the treatment of varicose great saphenous.
Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2010
Background: Endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) for ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) is thought to minimize postoperative morbidity compared with high ligation and stripping (HL/S). Only a few randomized trials have reported early results. This prospective randomized trial compared EVLT (980 nm) and HL/S results at 1 and 2 years after the intervention. Method: Patients with symptomatic varicose veins due to GSV insufficiency were randomized to HL/S (100 limbs) or EVLT (104 limbs). Four EVLT procedures failed primarily and were excluded. Phlebectomy and ligature of incompetent perforators were performed whenever indicated in both groups. Patients were re-examined clinically and by duplex ultrasound imaging preoperatively and at 12 days and at 1 and 2 years after treatment. Closure rate, complication rate, time to return to normal activity, the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Symptom Severity Score (AVVSS), the Varicose Venous Clinical Severity Score (VVCSS), and the Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 scores were also recorded. Results: There were no differences in patient demographics, CEAP class, Widmer class, or severity scores between the groups. Simultaneous interventions did not differ between the groups. Similar times for the return to normal activity and scores for postoperative pain were reported. No major complications after treatment were recorded. HL/S limbs had significantly more postoperative hematomas than EVLT limbs, and EVLT patients reported more bruising.
Systematic review of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins
Background: The safety and effectiveness of endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) for varicose veins are not yet fully evaluated. Methods: Medical bibliographic databases, the internet and reference lists were searched from January 1966 to September 2004. Only case series were available for inclusion in the review. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Self-limiting features, such as pain, ecchymosis, induration and phlebitis, were commonly encountered after treatment. Deep vein thrombosis and incorrect placement of the laser in vessels were uncommon adverse events. No study has yet assessed the effectiveness of laser therapy in comparison to saphenofemoral junction ligation with saphenous vein stripping. Occlusion of the saphenous vein and abolition of venous reflux occurred in 87ยท9-100 per cent of limbs, with low rates of re-treatment and recanalization.