Prospective multicenter evaluation of an initially placed button gastrostomy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Closure after gastrostomy button
Pediatric Surgery International, 2005
A gastrostomy device is removed from the gastrostoma when no longer needed. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis of whether it is possible for the surgeon to decide which stoma has to be closed with a gastroraphy and which to leave for a spontaneous closure within a reasonable period of time. Out of a cohort of 321 patients, who had been operated with a video-assisted gastrostomy, we included all the 48 patients having had their gastrostomy button removed. These patients were carefully followed and the closure of the gastrostoma was registered. According to the institutional routine we waited at least 3 months after the removal of the gastrostomy device before suggesting to the child's guardians an operative closure of the stoma. In 26 patients the stoma closed within 3 months, whereas in 22 patients a surgical gastroraphy was performed. We found no differences between the two groups regarding the patients' diagnoses, the duration of the gastrostoma use or patient's age at the time of removal of the gastrostomy device. This study rejected the hypothesis of predictability of the gastrostoma closure. Thus, we recommend a routine expectance after the removal of a gastrostomy device for at least 1 month. If no spontaneous closure occurs, then a gastroraphy should be performed.
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2006
Background: Gastrostomy tube placement is among the most common gastrointestinal procedures performed in children. The U-stitch laparoscopic technique allows primary button placement and the advantages of laparoscopy. The purpose of this study was to quantify the completion rate and the occurrence of complications in a large single-institution experience. Materials and Methods: All laparoscopic gastrostomy procedures between April 2000 and May 2005 were reviewed. Complications that required operative treatment or hospital readmission were classified as early (Ͻ90 days) or late (Ն90 days). Results: Laparoscopic gastrostomies were created in 461 patients during the study period with primary buttons being placed in 444 (96%). No procedure-related deaths occurred. Early complications included: reoperation secondary to tube dislodgement in 7 patients (1.5%), herniation of omentum postoperatively in 3 patients (0.6%), and development of granulation tissue or everted gastric mucosa requiring excision in 13 patients (3.2%). Late complications occurred in 8 patients (1.7%), with three (0.7%) requiring revision of the gastrostomy due to local site problems. Five patients (1.1%) had intraperitoneal placement of tubes during attempted replacement after 90 days. Age, infancy, and neurological impairment were not associated with a higher rate of complications. Conclusion: The U-stitch gastrostomy technique is safe and allows primary button placement in infants and children. Its complication rate compares favorably to other reported gastrostomy techniques.
The gastrostomy “button”—A simple, skin-level, nonrefluxing device for long-term enteral feedings
Journal of Pediatric Surgery, 1984
9 In an effort to eliminate the common problems associated with gastrostomy tubes in children, we developed a silicone rubber gastrostomy "'button'" designed to replace the standard long latex tube. Easily inserted and self-retaining, the device remains practically flush with the skin. The intragastric portion is similar to a dePezzer catheter, and a one-way valve prevents reflux of gastric contents. Prototypes were evaluated in five children for a time period of 3 to 18 months. In two additional patients with esophageal stricture, the device was used as a temporary plug to maintain gastric stoma patency. Parents and nurses are pleased with the button's low profile, appearance, and ease to use. It is neither painful nor irritating, and there is no fear of dislodgement.
Button Gastrostomy Tubes for Pediatric Patients: A Tertiary Care Center Experience
International Journal of Pediatrics
Background and Objective. Gastrostomy tube insertion is one of the most common procedures performed as a radical choice to overcome feeding difficulty in children. This study is aimed at describing the replacement of a button tube instead of the long tube for feeding infants and children requiring gastrostomies in a tertiary care hospital. Design and Setting. This retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted between January 2009 and August 2019 at Salmaniya Medical Complex which is a tertiary health care institute in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Subjects and Methods. Both charts and electronic health records of pediatric patients between the ages of 0 and 14 years were reviewed. Data were collected including age, sex, nationality, diagnosis, surgical information (procedure center and procedure performed), complications, and follow-up. Results. Out of 34 patients who underwent gastrostomy tube insertion, 30 patients had their long tube replaced by a button gastrostomy. Ma...
BMC Gastroenterology, 2009
Background: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) performed through the Introducer Technique is associated with lower risk of surgical infection when compared to the Pull Technique. Its use is less widespread as the fixation of the stomach to the abdominal wall is a stage of the procedure that is difficult to be performed. We present a new technical variant of gastropexy which is fast and easy to be performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a new technical variant of gastropexy in patients submitted to gastrostomy performed through the Introducer Technique.
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy—to push or pullA prospective randomized trial
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1986
A prospective randomized study was undertaken to evaluate the Ponsky-Gauderer and Sachs-Vine types of gastrostomy kits. The techniques, complications, morbidity, and mortality with each type of device are compared. Both devices are found to compare favorably to the traditional surgically placed gastrostomy. (Gastrointest Endosc 1986;32:253-258)
BMC Gastroenterology, 2009
Background: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) performed through the Introducer Technique is associated with lower risk of surgical infection when compared to the Pull Technique. Its use is less widespread as the fixation of the stomach to the abdominal wall is a stage of the procedure that is difficult to be performed. We present a new technical variant of gastropexy which is fast and easy to be performed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of a new technical variant of gastropexy in patients submitted to gastrostomy performed through the Introducer Technique.
Percutaneous gastrostomy placement by intervention radiology: Techniques and outcome
The Indian journal of radiology & imaging
Interventional radiology (IR) has played an important role in the technical evolution of gastrostomy, from the first surgical, endoscopical to percutaneous interventional procedures. This study is done to assess the technical feasibility and outcome of IR-guided percutaneous gastrostomy for patients requiring nutritional support for neuromuscular disorders or head and neck malignancies, as well as to describe simplified and newer technique for pull-type gastrostomy. This is a retrospective study including 29 patients who underwent IR-guided percutaneous gastrostomy over a period of 8 years in a tertiary-level institution. Either pull or push-type gastrostomy was performed in these patients as decided by the interventional radiologist. The procedures were assessed by analyzing the indications, technical aspects, and complications. Descriptive summary statistics and frequencies were used to assess the techniques and related complications. The sample consists of 27 patients (93%) with ...
Percutaneous image-guided gastrostomy insertion with and without gastropexy
The Arab Journal of Interventional Radiology, 2020
Purpose: The objective was to compare the major and minor complications of percutaneous gastrostomy with and without gastropexy. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients who underwent percutaneous gastrostomy with or without gastropexy between January 2015 and November 2018. A total of 830 patients (512 males [61.8%] and 318 females [38.2%]) were included in the study. Gastropexy was performed for 428 (51.6%) patients (343 pigtail and 85 balloon-type gastrostomies). The remaining 402 patients (48.4%) had no gastropexy (387 pigtail and 15 balloon-type gastrostomies). Major and minor complication rates were assessed within 30 days postprocedure. Results: Technical success was 100% with and without gastropexy. Complications were recorded in 143 patients (17.2%): six major complications in 6 patients and 155 minor complications in 137 patients. Major complications included peritonitis (n = 1) and severe skin infection (n = 1) in the gastropexy group, where...