A BRIEF NOTE OF THANKS (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education
The title of this editorial may cause some to wonder regarding its meaning: The End of the Beginning. The current co-editors are stepping aside for a new editorial team to assume responsibility for IRGEE. That is the End. The Beginning is the fact that the emeriti editors were present for the very first issue of International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education (IRGEE). John Lidstone, along with Rod Gerber, was foundation co-editor and Joe Stoltman was the author of the first article in the first issue in 1992. However, although those of us who have been involved with IRGEE since The Beginning are stepping down as day-today editors, we will retain a keen interest in the future of IRGEE as it faces a new Beginning under new editors. We look forward to watching the journal develop still further as a leader in the ever-emerging world of academic endeavour in geographical and environmental education. The idea of creating a new peer reviewed academic research journal to promote high quality research in geographical and environmental education first emerged during the 1984 International Geographical Union Commission on Geographical Education (IGU. CGE) conference in Freiburg, Germany. It was the initial conference for Rod Gerber, an Australian geography educator. The discussion about the journal was brief and positive, and the gem of a journal became Rod's focus during the subsequent four years. The concept of IRGEE was well developed in Rod's mind by the time of the IGU-CGE Symposium in Brisbane, Australia, in 1988. At that time, much of the international readily accessible peer reviewed academic research in the area came mainly from the United Kingdom and the United States. IGU-CGE Conference Proceedings and independent research reports and studies were a secondary source of research. National geography teacher associations in different countries published local research, but often in the local language. Prior to the Internet, they were not easily accessible internationally. Thus, important as all these publications were, there were relatively few opportunities for scholars (particularly early career academics) to publish in an international peer reviewed journal. Researchers seeking to identify trends in research encountered difficulty in identifying and collating research specific to topics in geography education. Following discussions at the IGU-CGE Symposium with outgoing Chair of the Commission, Joseph Stoltman, and incoming Chair, Hartwig Haubrich, it was assigned to Rod Gerber and John Lidstone to develop a new, explicitly international journal on behalf of the Commission. Rod Gerber proposed that the new journal would promote high-quality research in geographical and environmental education from across the globe, making particular efforts to encourage younger researchers to publish their research internationally. The impact was intended to capture the diversity of interpretations of geographical education internationally. The result would be a cross fertilisation of knowledge with the potential to enhance "core" knowledge about the teaching and learning of geography. IRGEE,
IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 2000
Fromthe editors' desks 3 It's all in the name-A step forward-Readers' survey-Annual General Meeting 2004-EASE Forum-Contributions for the next issue
Exarc.net - The Issue of a Journal
The Exarc Show, 2021
Recording Date 2021-08-06 Guests Martina Revello Lami (NL) and Luca Bartoni (IT) Introduction Academic journals are an integral element of how we share knowledge of new discoveries, practices, and ideas. But how do these journals get started, what kinds of difficulties do they face and why do we need new ones? In this month’s episode of Finally Friday, our guest speakers discuss their experiences in founding new academic journals. Martina Revello Lami is an archaeologist and guest researcher at the University of Leiden in the Netherlands. Her research has recently expanded to begin exploring the complex relationship between archaeology and society. This is a core aspect of the Ex Novo Journal of Archaeology. Luca Bartoni specialises in IT but has always been interested in History and Culture. He began his venture into living history in 2002 and is currently the president of Archeologia, Reenacment e Storia (AReS). Luca is also a Journal Manager of the digital journal Archeologie Sperimentali. Temi, Metodi, Ricerche.
Society news: IEEE measurement and networking symposium, 2019 (M 2019)
IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine
EEE Symposium on Measurements and Networking (M&N) is one of the flagship conferences of the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Society (IMS). M&N 2019 presented a forum for researchers and practitioners from industry, academia, government and standardization committees interested in the areas of measurements, communications, computer science, wireless systems, and sensor networks and fostered discussion on the role of both measurements for networking and networking for measurements. The Symposium is mainly promoted by IEEE IMS TC-37 Measurements and Networking, the IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Italy Chapter and the IEEE Italy Section Systems Council Chapter. In 2019, this biennial event reached the 5 th edition, and it involved researchers and experts coming from different parts of the world.
Since Aleksei Balabanov's films Brother (Brat, 1997) and Brother 2 (Brat 2, 2000) were released, they have achieved cult status in Russia. The popularity of these films has often been attributed to their concern with Russian national identity and their portrayal of a national hero. While explaining their success in these terms, however, Russian reviewers have strongly criticized the exclusive nature of the nationalism portrayed in the films and viewed the public's enthusiastic reaction to them as a symptom of a disturbing national malaise. In this article I analyse the critical discussion of the films before looking at viewer responses to determine whether they substantiate some of the critics' fears, namely that a maladjusted Russian population is interpreting the hero's actions as a justification for an excessively narrow kind of national ideal. Having nuanced the idea that the Brother films exploit the divisions in Russian society to inculcate a very exclusive type of national identity, I suggest that it is the films' portrayal of a 'gangster hero' and the films' depiction of the criminalization of Russian society that allows the Brother films to play a role in the construction of national identity in Russia.
Theoria, 2021
It is a common practice for authors of an academic work to thank the anonymous reviewers at the journal that is publishing it. Allegedly, scholars thank the reviewers because their comments improved the paper and thanking them is a proper way to show gratitude to them. Yet often, a paper that is eventually accepted by one journal is first rejected by other journals, and even though those journals' reviewers also supply comments that improve the quality of the work, those reviewers are not customarily thanked. We contacted prominent scholars in bioethics and philosophy of medicine and asked whether thanking such reviewers would be a welcome trend. Having received responses from 107 scholars, we discuss the suggested proposal in light of both philosophical argument and the results of this survey. We argue that when an author's work is published , the author should thank the reviewers whose comments improved the paper regardless of whether those reviewers' journals rejected or accepted the work. That is because scholars should show gratitude to those who deserve it, and those whose comments improved the paper deserve gratitude. We also consider objections against this practice raised by scholars and show why they are not entirely persuasive.
Introductory Note. This little essay and the mass of supporting documents represent, in part, the fallout from my submission of “Culture, Mind, and Physical Reality: An Anthropological Essay” to the American Anthropologist. The so-called “peer review” process conducted by the editor-in-chief of AA consumed most of three years. The correspondence and reviews generated during that period comprise a valuable ethnographic collection, although not housed in a museum or having as its object a bona-fide “primitive culture,” but a collection that reveals in some detail the actual working of another doomed social formation: the enterprise of Cultural Anthropology as practiced in turn-of-the-century America. What follows, then, is a little slice of an ethnography of ourselves.