Asset Price Bubbles and Central Bank Policies: The Crash of the'Jackson Hole Consensus (original) (raw)
This paper reexamines the main arguments of whether or not monetary policy should respond to asset bubbles. The question of how the central bank should respond to an asset bubble can be reformulated in two ways. First, how does the central bank respond while an asset bubble is growing, and second, how does it respond after the bubble bursts? There has been strong agreement among economists that a central bank should respond to the bursting of a bubble by aggressively decreasing the Fed funds rate to minimize the adverse impact of financial instability on the real economy. However, there is no clear answer to the question of how the central bank should respond to an asset bubble before it bursts. If there is evidence that the asset price bubble is contributing to inflation, then there is general agreement that the central bank should respond. But what if prices remain stable? These issues are critically reviewed and the conclusion is reached that the high costs associated with the 2007-2009 financial crisis have encouraged the development of a new central bank policy paradigm that encourages -leaning against bubbles‖ and giving due consideration to alternative tools other than interest rate policy tools.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Should Monetary Policy Respond To Asset Price Bubbles? Revisiting the Debate
National Institute Economic Review, 2008
Recent events have highlighted the importance of asset prices to central bank decisions. We argue that, in response to asset price bubbles, central banks should ‘lean against the wind’ (LATW hereafter). Even if the bubbles themselves are not significantly affected by LATW, macroeconomic performance can be improved if monetary policy reacts to asset price misalignments over and above the reaction to fixed horizon inflation forecasts. In addition, it might reduce the probability of bubbles arising at all. This article restates the case for LATW, and reviews the debate. In particular I respond to various criticisms that have been made against LATW and briefly consider alternative policies designed to make the financial system less cyclical.
How should monetary policy respond to asset-price bubbles?
2005
We present a simple macroeconomic model that includes a role for an asset-price bubble. We then derive optimal monetary policy settings for two policymakers: a skeptic, for whom the best forecast of future asset prices is the current price; and an activist, whose policy ...
Rethinking Monetary Stabilization in the Presence of an Asset Bubble
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
This paper addresses three important questions: how should monetary policy respond to stock market booms, what causes stock market bubbles and can monetary policy pop them. These questions arose during the recent stock market bubble during 1995-2000 and its collapse during 2000-1. To answer these questions we rapidly review the lessons learned from the Fed's response to the stock market boom in the 1920s and the lessons learned from the response of the Bank of Japan in the 1990s. The conclusion of the paper is that an asymmetric response of monetary policy to the stock market booms is appropriate: neutral in stock market booms unless they cause inflation, monetary ease after a stock market bust to dampen the effect on output and if necessary to provide liquidity to the financial system. The theoretical bubble literature and the U.S. experience in the 1920s provides little evidence that monetary policy can pop bubbles and attempting do so is potentially costly in terms of lost output.
Recent Monetary Policy in the U.S.: Risk Management of Asset Bubbles
The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 2005
Recently Chairman Greenspan (2003 and 2004) has discussed a risk management approach to the implementation of monetary policy. This paper explores the economic environment of the 1990s and the policy dilemmas the Fed faced given the stock boom from the mid to late 1990s to after the bust in 2000-2001. Drawing on Greenspan's comments about conducting monetary policy in the real world of risk and uncertainty, the paper assesses why US monetary policy was neutral with respect to the stock market boom.
Are the Effects of Unconventional Monetary Policy on Financial Markets Causing Bubbles?
Journal of Business Accounting and Finance Perspectives
Cheap money can become very expensive in the long run. Unconventional monetary policies have been the main tools of central banks to tackle the economic crisis. In this paper we aim to understand whether these policies have created distortions in the fi nancial markets and if we can be concerned about the creation of “bubbles”, considering whether quantitative easing has impacted fi nancial asset classes’ valuations beyond reasonable fundamentals. I conclude that there is empirical evidence of inordinate expansion of multiples and that central bank policy makers should include “fi nancial market infl ation” as well as consumer price indices (CPI) in their assessment of infl ation expectations. I believe that this should be an essential analysis to avoid unintended consequences in the future, and a possible next fi nancial crisis that central banks will be unable to face with the same tools of the past.
Essays on Monetary Policy and Asset Price Bubbles: Evidence from the U.S. Housing Bubble
The link between monetary policy and bubbles in asset prices is investigated in two separate empirical studies as well as an examination of theoretical models of asset-price bubbles. Common methods used to estimate bubbles are discussed including difficulties of empirically identifying bubbles in asset prices, and whether a response from central banks is appropriate. To empirically explore the relationship between monetary policy and asset-price bubbles, I examine the recent housing bubble in the United States to determine if the Fed’s use of expansionary policy during this time contributed to the run-up in house prices. Methods employed include OLS and generalized method of moments (GMM) to estimate empirical Taylor-type policy reaction functions. Granger causality analysis, impulse response functions, and forecast error variance decomposition are applied to VAR models to determine the impact of the Fed’s loose monetary policy on the U.S. housing market. Separate specifications for the Fed’s traditional interest rate targeting policy as well as recent non-traditional policies including quantitative easing are tested to examine any impact of these monetary policies on house prices. The findings are consistent with the view that the Federal Reserve held interest rates artificially low during the years of the housing bubble, and both traditional and non-traditional policies of the Fed in recent years impacted house prices.
The E¤ects of Monetary Policy on Stock Market Bubbles: Some Evidence
We estimate the response of stock prices to exogenous monetary policy shocks using a vector-autoregressive model with time-varying parameters. Our evidence points to protracted episodes in which, after a a short-run decline, stock prices increase persistently in response to an exogenous tightening of monetary policy. That response is clearly at odds with the "conventional" view on the e¤ects of monetary policy on bubbles, as well as with the predictions of bubbleless models. We also argue that it is unlikely that such evidence be accounted for by an endogenous response of the equity premium to the monetary policy shocks.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.