Limitations of percutaneous techniques in the treatment of portal vein thrombosis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Portal vein thrombosis: A concise review (Review)
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2021
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a frequent complication in cirrhotic patients, but it may also exist as a basic vascular condition even without any liver damage. Local and systemic factors play a significant role in the pathogenesis of PVT; yet, in practice, more than one factor may be identified. PVT can be considered a result of liver fibrosis and hepatic insufficiency. The JAK2 mutation has been accepted as a factor producing PVT. In general, the anticoagulants are recommended but this therapy should be used carefully in treating patients that associate coagulopathy or thrombocytopenia and esophageal varices. Acute PVT without bowel infarction has a good prognosis. In liver cirrhosis, the mortality due to hemorrhage is higher than in chronic PVT. Therefore, for the patients with PVT, the survival rate is decreased by 55% in two years, due to hepatic insufficiency. Regarding the treatment, LMWH (low molecular weight heparine) is the most utilized in patients with cirrhosis, non-malignancies, infections, or those who are awaiting a liver transplant. DOACs (direct-acting oral anticoagulants) may be used in the rest of the medical conditions, being safe and equal to LMWH.
Review article: portal vein thrombosis - new insights into aetiology and management
Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2005
Portal vein thrombosis may occur in the presence or absence of underlying liver disease, and a combination of local and systemic factors are increasingly recognized to be important in its development. Acute and chronic portal vein thrombosis have traditionally been considered separately, although a clear clinical distinction may be difficult. Gastrooesophageal varices are an important complication of portal vein thrombosis, but they follow a different natural history to those with portal hypertension related to cirrhosis. Consensus on optimal treatment continues to be hampered by a lack of randomized trials, but recent studies demonstrate the efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in acute thrombosis, and the apparent safety and benefit of anticoagulation in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis.
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT): A study of 20 non-irrhotic cases
Swiss medical weekly: official journal of the Swiss Society of Infectious Diseases, the Swiss Society of Internal Medicine, the Swiss Society of Pneumology
Portal and mesenteric venous thrombosis (PVT) is an uncommon disease with serious consequences if not discovered early in order to prevent complications such as variceal bleeding and intestinal ischaemia. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical presentation and outcome of patients with PVT with a view to early diagnosis and treatment of this disease. The study was restricted to patients with PVT not caused by underlying liver cirrhosis. To analyse important clinical characteristics of this entity we performed a retrospective study of 20 non-cirrhotic patients seen in our hospital from February 1998 to March 2003. The main clinical symptom was abdominal pain (13 patients, 86%), sometimes in combination with diarrhoea and vomiting (5 patients, 33%), nausea and anorexia (3 patients). Laboratory signs were non-specific and diagnosis was usually by computed tomography (19 patients, 95%). Causative factors included prothrombotic states (9 patients, 45%) and/or local facto...
Journal of International Medical Research, 2011
This observational cohort study reports the short-and long-term clinical outcomes of 31 patients admitted for acute nonmalignant, non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) over a 10-year period. Patients had a mean age of 43 years at admission and a mean duration of followup of 84 months. All patients were initially treated with anticoagulants. Complete recanalization occurred within 30 days after admission in 18 patients (58%), partially in nine patients (29%), and failed in four patients (13%). During follow-up, 10 patients (32%) had at least one episode of gastrointestinal bleeding. The probability of remaining bleed-free was 0.93 at 24 months and 0.61 at 48 months. Fundal varices were not controlled by endoscopic sclerotherapy, so all four patients underwent portosystemic shunt construction. To date, there has been no mortality. In conclusion, using a combination of different treatment options reduces the risk of death and late complications in patients with nonmalignant, non-cirrhotic PVT.
Portal vein thrombosis: Insight into physiopathology, diagnosis, and treatment
World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a relatively common complication in patients with liver cirrhosis, but might also occur in absence of an overt liver disease. Several causes, either local or systemic, might play an important role in PVT pathogenesis. Frequently, more than one risk factor could be identified; however, occasionally no single factor is discernable. Clinical examination, laboratory investigations, and imaging are helpful to provide a quick diagnosis, as prompt treatment might greatly affect a patient's outcome. In this review, we analyze the physiopathological mechanisms of PVT development, together with the hemodynamic and functional alterations related to this condition. Moreover, we describe the principal factors most frequently involved in PVT development and the recent knowledge concerning diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Finally, we analyze the implications of PVT in the setting of liver transplantation and its possible influence on patients' future prognoses.
Portal vein thrombosis; risk factors, clinical presentation and treatment
BMC Gastroenterology, 2007
Background: Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is increasingly frequently being diagnosed, but systematic descriptions of the natural history and clinical handling of the condition are sparse. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe risk factors, clinical presentation, complications and treatment of portal vein thrombosis in a single-centre.
Acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis: A prospective multicenter follow-up study
Hepatology, 2010
Current recommendations for early anticoagulation in acute portal vein thrombosis unrelated to cirrhosis or malignancy are based on limited evidence. The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the risk factors, outcome, and prognosis in patients managed according to these recommendations. We enrolled 102 patients with acute thrombosis of the portal vein, or its left or right branch. Laboratory investigations for prothrombotic factors were centralized. Thrombus extension and recanalization were assessed by expert radiologists. A local risk factor was identified in 21% of patients, and one or several general prothrombotic conditions in 52%. Anticoagulation was given to 95 patients. After a median of 234 days, the portal vein and its left or right branch were patent in 39% of anticoagulated patients (versus 13% initially), the splenic vein in 80% (versus 57% initially), and the superior mesenteric vein in 73% (versus 42% initially). Failure to recanalize the portal vein was independently related to the presence of ascites (hazard ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval 1.3-11.1) and an occluded splenic vein (hazard ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.