The Secret History: The Official Position of Imperator Caesar Divi filius from 31 to 27 BCE (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Roman Studies 87 (1997), 1997
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
2023
The XXviri ex senatus consulto rei publicae curandae played a decisive role in the civil war between Maximinus Thrax and the senate in 238. This note examines the actions of the extraordinary committee and interprets them against the backdrop of the reception of constitutional thought rooted in that, which was perceived as traditional political ideals of the Roman Republic during the Principate. The study will first look at the roots of the conflicts between Maximinus Thrax and the ordo senatorius, followed by an analysis of the origins and tasks of the XXviri together with their political goals and possible republican exempla. Finally, there will be observations on the vigintivirate's significance and role after the senate's triumph over its enemy. In doing so, this contribution will emphasize the importance of republican constitutional thought in times of crisis for the continued existence of the res publica romana under the Principate.
Octavian-Augustus, the coniuratio Italiae, imperium and the concept of dux.
Impact of Empire XIII. The impact of ‘Justice’ on the Roman Empire.
2017
ABSTRACT: Ancient sources clash with how Gracchus brothers are treated. While some authors unify the trajectory of these two characters, other authors point out the differences they both had (App. BC I, 11-22; D.S. XXXIV / XXXV, 25, 1). Modern historiography generally tends to continue with the idea of the first group. However, I think Appian and Diodorus were right. Tiberius tries to look for equality among all citizens, closer to the ideal of stoic justice that he inherits of his mentor and collaborator, Blossius of Cumas. This stoic project will materialize in his famous reform (Erskine 1990; Linttot 1994). On the other hand, Caius seeks confrontation of elites, senatores and equites. Even the support they receive is different, since Tiberius bases its power on other members of the aristocracy (Plut. TG 9), while Caius is supported by the populace (Plut. CG 12). My goal is to try to find out in the media used by both (the nobiles and the plebs) to achieve their political ends.
Vis Principatus: Tacitus’ vis as a term for the absolute power of the Roman emperor
Quaderni di Storia, 2023
ABSTRACT. This paper is a study of the word vis in Tacitus and its use to describe the power of the Roman emperorship. Vis encompasses meanings that map onto different spheres of activity, not only denoting strength, force, violence and power: it often is used to capture an idea or a term, just as we use ‘force’ (sc. force of the laws) in English. More specifically, vis is another word for the power held by an individual (whether a magistrate or not) in the Republic. Vis becomes a specific way to summarise an emperor’s power, which connects it to offices in the Roman past, such as the tribunate, censorship, dicta- torship and kingship. Thus, it can be a useful tool with which to think critically about what the Roman emperor is and what his powers were perceived to be in Tacitus, an au- thor of immeasurable impact on the theorisation of the principate.
Once Again to the Question of Octavian Augustus’ Principate
JOURNAL OF ANCIENT HISTORY AND ARCHAEOLOGY, 2019
In the article on the basis of scientific publications of Russian and foreign scientists, as well as information of ancient authors, there is the analysis of little-studied problems of the formation of Roman Caesarism not only from formal legal, but also socioeconomic and political points of view which objectively influenced the transformation of the Republican system in Rome. The author tries to resolve the question whether Octavian desired power for his personal elevation, and the formation for this the monarchical form of government, as many researchers believe, or his purpose was the development of the Republican system which was adequate to the challenges of time? Were the powers of August different from powers of other Roman magistrates? The article proposes a new vision of the purposes and tasks of the propaganda war between Antony and Octavian, as well as the peculiarities of Augustus acquisition of prestige and authority and powers of the tribune and consul, which became the basis of his Imperial power.