Interactions between Canopy Structure and Herbaceous Biomass along Environmental Gradients in Moist Forest and Dry Miombo Woodland of Tanzania (original) (raw)

Abstract

We have limited understanding of how tropical canopy foliage varies along environmental gradients, and how this may in turn affect forest processes and functions. Here, we analyse the relationships between canopy leaf area index (LAI) and above ground herbaceous biomass (AGB H ) along environmental gradients in a moist forest and miombo woodland in Tanzania. We recorded canopy structure and herbaceous biomass in 100 permanent vegetation plots (20 m × 40 m), stratified by elevation. We quantified tree species richness, evenness, Shannon diversity and predominant height as measures of structural variability, and disturbance (tree stumps), soil nutrients and elevation as indicators of environmental variability. Moist forest and miombo woodland differed substantially with respect to nearly all variables tested. Both structural and environmental variables were found to affect LAI and AGB H , the latter being additionally dependent on LAI in moist forest but not in miombo, where other factors are limiting. Combining structural and environmental predictors yielded the most powerful models. In moist forest, they explained 76% and 25% of deviance in LAI and AGB H , respectively. In miombo woodland, they explained 82% and 45% of deviance in LAI and AGB H . In moist forest, LAI increased non-linearly with predominant height and linearly with tree richness, and decreased with soil nitrogen except under high disturbance. Miombo woodland LAI increased linearly with stem density, soil phosphorous and nitrogen, and decreased linearly with tree species evenness. AGB H in moist forest decreased with LAI at lower elevations whilst increasing slightly at higher elevations. AGB H in miombo woodland increased linearly with soil nitrogen and soil pH. Overall, moist forest plots had denser canopies and lower AGB H compared with miombo plots. Further field studies are encouraged, to disentangle the direct influence of LAI on AGB H from complex interrelationships between stand structure, environmental gradients and disturbance in African forests and woodlands.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (65)

  1. Kohyama T (1993) Size structured tree populations in gap-dynamic forest the forest architecture hypothesis for the stable coexistence of species. J Ecol 81: 131-143.
  2. Ishii H, Azuma W, Nabeshima E (2013) The need for a canopy perspective to understand the impor- tance of phenotypic plasticity for promoting species coexistence and light-use complementarity in forest ecosystems. Ecol Res 28: 191-198.
  3. Reich PB (2012) Key canopy traits drive forest productivity. Proc Biol Sci 279: 2128-2134. doi: 10. 1098/rspb.2011.2270 PMID: 22279168
  4. Turner IM (2001) The ecology of trees in the tropical rain forest: Cambridge University Press. 290 p.
  5. Hardwick SR, Toumi R, Pfeifer M, Turner EC, Nilus R, et al. (2015) The relationship between leaf area index and microclimate in tropical forest and oil palm plantation: Forest disturbance drives changes in microclimate. Agric For Meteorol 201: 187-195.
  6. Sagar R, Pandey A, Singh J (2012) Composition, species diversity, and biomass of the herbaceous community in dry tropical forest of northern India in relation to soil moisture and light intensity. The Envi- ronmentalist 32: 485-493.
  7. Gatti RC, Castaldi S, Lindsell JA, Coomes DA, Marchetti M, et al. (2015) The impact of selective logging and clearcutting on forest structure, tree diversity and above-ground biomass of African tropical forests. Ecol Res 30: 119-132.
  8. Veenendaal E, Torello-Raventos M, Feldpausch T, Domingues T, Gerard F, et al. (2015) Structural, physiognomic and above-ground biomass variation in savanna-forest transition zones on three conti- nents-how different are co-occurring savanna and forest formations? Biogeosciences 12: 2927-2951.
  9. Campbell B, Frost P, Byron N (1996) Miombo woodlands and their use: Overview and key issues. In: Campbell B, editor. The miombo in tansition: Woodlands and welfare in Africa. Bogor, Indonesia: Cen- ter for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). pp. 1-5.
  10. Murphy PG, Lugo AE (1986) Ecology of tropical dry forest. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 17: 67-88.
  11. Shirima D, Munishi PKT, Lewis SL, Burgess ND, Marshall AR, et al. (2011) Carbon storage, structure and composition of miombo woodlands in Tanzania's Eastern Arc Mountains. Afr J Ecol 49: 332-342.
  12. Pfeifer M, Lefebvre V, Gonsamo A, Pellikka PK, Marchant R, et al. (2014) Validating and linking the GIMMS leaf area index (LAI3g) with environmental controls in tropical Africa. Remote Sens 6: 1973- 1990.
  13. Mograbi PJ, Erasmus BFN, Witkowski ETF, Asner GP, Wessels KJ, et al. (2015) Biomass Increases Go under Cover: Woody Vegetation Dynamics in South African Rangelands. PLoS ONE 10: e0127093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127093 PMID: 25969985
  14. Willcock S, Phillips O, Platts P, Balmford A, Burgess N, et al. (2014) Quantifying and understanding car- bon storage and sequestration within the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania, a tropical biodiversity hot- spot. Carbon Balance and Manag 9: 2.
  15. Marshall A, Willcock S, Lovett J, Balmford A, Burgess N, et al. (2012) Measuring and modelling above- ground carbon storage and tree allometry along an elevation gradient. Biol Conserv 154: 20-33.
  16. Munishi P, Shear T (2004) Carbon storage in afromontane rain forests of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania: their net contribution to atmospheric carbon. J Trop For Sci 16: 78-93.
  17. Fischer R, Ensslin A, Rutten G, Fischer M, Costa DS, et al. (2015) Simulating Carbon Stocks and Fluxes of an African Tropical Montane Forest with an Individual-Based Forest Model. PLoS ONE 10: e0123300. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123300 PMID: 25915854
  18. Williams M, Ryan CM, Rees RM, Sambane E, Fernando J, et al. (2008) Carbon sequestration and bio- diversity of re-growing miombo woodlands in Mozambique. For Ecol Manage 254: 145-155.
  19. FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment Rome, Italy: FAO. 340 p.
  20. Tanzania URo (1998) National Forest Policy. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Natural Resources and Tour- ism. 59 p.
  21. Dewees PA, Campbell BM, Katerere Y, Sitoe A, Cunningham AB, et al. (2010) Managing the Miombo woodlands of southern Africa: policies, incentives and options for the rural poor. Journal of natural resources policy research 2: 57-73.
  22. Campbell B, Angelsen A, Cunningham A, Katerere Y, Sitoe A, et al. (2007) Miombo woodlands-oppor- tunities and barriers to sustainable forest management. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. Available: http:// www.cifor.cgiar.org/miombo/docs/Campbell\_BarriersandOpportunities.pdf (4th November 2008).
  23. Frost PGH (1996) The ecology of miombo woodlands. In: Campbell B, editor. The miombo in transition: Woodlands and welfare in Africa Bogor Indonesia: CFIOR. pp. 11-57.
  24. Thomas PA, Packham JR (2007) Ecology of woodlands and forests, description, dynamics and diver- sity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 528 p.
  25. Gibbs HK, Brown S, Niles JO, Foley JA (2007) Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality. Environ Res Lett 2: 045023.
  26. Platts PJ O P, Marchant R (2015) AFRICLIM: high-resolution climate projections for ecological applica- tions in Africa. Afr J Ecol 53: 103-108.
  27. Lovett JC, Pocs I (1993) Assessment of the conditions of the catchment forest reserves, A botanical appraisal. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.: Forest Division ⁄ NORAD. 300 p.
  28. Scholes R, Kendall J, Justice C (1996) The quantity of biomass burned in southern Africa. J Geophys Res 101: 23667-23676.
  29. Baas SP, Keßler PJA, Slik JWF, ter Steege H, Raes N (2011) Human and environmental influence on plant diversity and composition in Ben En National Park, Vietnam. J Trop For Sci 23: 328-337.
  30. Kissinger G, Herold M, De Sy V (2012) Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: a synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers.
  31. Pfeifer M, Gonsamo A, Disney M, Pellikka P, Marchant R (2012) Leaf area index for biomes of the East- ern Arc Mountains: Landsat and SPOT observations along precipitation and altitude gradients. Remote Sens Environ 118: 103-115.
  32. Jonckheere I, Fleck S, Nackaerts K, Muys B, Coppin P, et al. (2004) Review of methods for in situ leaf area index determination: Part I. Theories, sensors and hemispherical photography. Agric For Meteorol 121: 19-35.
  33. Bréda NJ (2003) Ground-based measurements of leaf area index: a review of methods, instruments and current controversies. J Exp Bot 54: 2403-2417. PMID: 14565947
  34. Gonsamo Gosa A (2009) Remote sensing of leaf area index: enhanced retrieval from close-range and remotely sensed optical observations. Helsingiensis Instituti Geographici Universitatis.
  35. Fournier R, Landry R, August N, Fedosejevs G, Gauthier R (1996) Modelling light obstruction in three conifer forests using hemispherical photography and fine tree architecture. Agric For Meteorol 82: 47- 72.
  36. Jonckheere I, Muys B, Coppin P (2005) Allometry and evaluation of in situ optical LAI determination in Scots pine: a case study in Belgium. Tree Physiol 25: 723-732. PMID: 15805092
  37. Weiss M, Baret F (2014) CAN-EYE V6.313 User Manual. In: (INRA) FNIoAR, editor. Available: http:// www6pacainrafr/can-eye/Documentation-Publications/Documentation.
  38. Weiss M, Baret F, Myneni R, Pragnère A, Knyazikhin Y (2000) Investigation of a model inversion tech- nique to estimate canopy biophysical variables from spectral and directional reflectance data. Agrono- mie 20: 3-22.
  39. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Biometrische Zeitschrift 13: 219-220.
  40. Shannon CEW (1949) The mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana,: Univ. of Illinois Press. 117 p.
  41. Van Laar A, Akça A (2007) Forest mensuration: Springer. 389 p.
  42. West PW, West PW (2009) Tree and forest measurement: Springer. 191 p.
  43. Zuur A, Ieno EN, Walker N, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R; Gail M, Krickeberg K, Samet JM, Tsiatis A, Wong W, editors. New York: Springer. 574 p.
  44. Crawley MJ (2009) Mixed-Effects Model. The R Book. West Sussex. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 627-660 p.
  45. Crawley MJ (2012) The R book: John Wiley & Sons.
  46. Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, et al. (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36: 27-46.
  47. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical prob- lems. Methods Ecol Evol 1: 3-14.
  48. Murtaugh PA (2009) Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data. Ecol Lett 12: 1061-1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01361.x PMID: 19702634
  49. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning: Springer. 441 p.
  50. Canty A, Ripley B (2014) Package 'boot'. Available at CRAN. Available: http://cran.rproject.org/web/ packages/boot/index.html.
  51. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists: Cambridge Univer- sity Press. 557 p.
  52. Gilliam FS, Roberts MR (2003) Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests: A mechanism for linkage. In: Gilliam FSR, R M., editor. The herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 198-223.
  53. Unger M, Homeier J, Leuschner C (2013) Relationships among leaf area index, below-canopy light availability and tree diversity along a transect from tropical lowland to montane forests in NE Ecuador. Trop Ecol 54: 33-45.
  54. DeRose RJ, Seymour RS (2010) Patterns of leaf area index during stand development in even-aged balsam fir-red spruce stands. Can J For Res 40: 629-637.
  55. Yuan Y, Wang X, Yin F, Zhan J (2013) Examination of the quantitative relationship between vegetation canopy height and LAI. Adv Meteor 2013: 6.
  56. Scholes RJ, Archer SR (1997) Tree-grass interactions in savannas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28: 517-544.
  57. Gilliam FS (2007) The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 57: 845-858.
  58. Coomes DA, Allen RB (2007) Effects of size, competition and altitude on tree growth. J Ecol 95: 1084- 1097.
  59. Callaway RM (2007) Interaction between competition and facilitation: Springer.
  60. Bertness MD, Callaway R (1994) Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 191-193. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90088-4 PMID: 21236818
  61. Malkinson D, Tielbörger K (2010) What does the stress-gradient hypothesis predict? Resolving the dis- crepancies. Oikos 119: 1546-1552.
  62. Price MF, Byers AC, Friend DA, Kohler T, Price LW (2013) Mountain geography: physical and human dimensions: Univ of California Press.
  63. Ludwig F, Kroon H, Prins HH, Berendse F (2001) Effects of nutrients and shade on tree-grass interac- tions in an East African savanna. J Veg Sci 12: 579-588.
  64. Runyan CW, D'Odorico P, Lawrence D (2012) Effect of repeated deforestation on vegetation dynamics for phosphorus-limited tropical forests. J Geophys Res Biogeosci 117: G01008.
  65. Ribeiro NS, Syampungani S, Matakala NM, Nangoma D, Ribeiro-Barros AI (2015) Miombo Woodlands Research Towards the Sustainable Use of Ecosystem Services in Southern Africa.