History on Trial: Evaluating Learning Outcomes through Audit and Accreditation in a National Standards Environment (original) (raw)
Related papers
History in Practice: Applying standards to tertiary-level history
History Australia, 2011
This paper discusses the challenges of applying standards to the teaching of tertiary-level history. It gives a critical overview of the emerging standards process in Australia, re-emphasising the importance of disciplinary input in producing a workable and acceptable regulatory framework under the aegis of Australia's recently-established Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). To this end, it argues for the importance of building capacity within the history discipline both to engage with policy makers in coming months, and to take an active role in defining and implementing national standards for tertiary history. It suggests the potential of grassroots initiatives such as the After Standards project to assist historians in meeting this challenge. This article has been peer-reviewed. The prospect of applying national standards to the teaching of tertiary-level history within a national regulatory environment presents the discipline of history with challenges and possibilities. The possibilities can only be realised if historians are actively involved in designing and implementing new learning and teaching outcomes for history – whether they are based on the discipline-generated Threshold Learning Outcomes (TLOs) released by the now obsolete Australian Learning and Teaching Council (ALTC) in December 2010, or on new criteria to be formulated under the recently established Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA).
Tertiary Education and Management, 2003
This paper reports a recent national study by the Centre for the Study of Higher Education into contemporary practices in student assessment in Australian higher education and the issues of quality assurance facing the sector in the light of public speculation and concern about academic standards. A major issue emerging from the project is the importance of defining the relationships between approaches to student assessment and grading, quality assurance and academic standards. The paper discusses the issues surrounding academic standards in Australia in the context of the new national framework for higher education quality assurance and the role of the Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA). RENEWED DISCUSSION ABOUT ACADEMIC STANDARDS IN AUSTRALIAN HIGHER EDUCATION In April 2002, the Australian government launched a major review of Australian higher education with a Ministerial discussion paper, Higher Education at the Crossroads (Nelson 2002). The Minister's framework for consultation was sweeping, canvassing the quality of learning experiences and outcomes, equity of access, institutional specialisation, governance and management, and possible new funding arrangements. One issue given particular prominence in Crossroads was the question of academic standards and the processes for assuring the standards of Australian awards: Over the years there have been allegations that university standards are falling. Some critics contend that some universities now offer courses lacking intellectual rigour and that there has been a 'dumbing down' of universities. There are also concerns about a deterioration in the calibre of students entering university but the available evidence does not support this. There have been claims that 'softmarking' has become common practice, and the quality of education has generally been compromised.
An evaluation of the Quality Mark for History for primary schools in the UK
Education 3-13, 2018
The aim of the research is to evaluate the impact on stakeholders participating within an assessment process focusing on the learning and teaching of history in primary schools. The assessment was devised by the Historical Association (UK) leading to the award of a Quality Mark. This award was introduced in September 2014 with the aim of rewarding schools where there is a culture of excellence in the learning and teaching of history, and to develop a set of aspirations for other schools to work towards. The research employed mixed methodology including interviews and questionnaires. Findings support the significant impact on the school, and in particular the subject leader, of engaging in such a programme. This is the first phase of a four-year project, which will look at long-term impact and whether progress has been sustained.
Doing history?": Assessment in history classrooms at a time of curriculum reform
Curriculum reform in South Africa has embraced outcomes-based education for a decade now. This paper examines curriculum reform in the subject of history. The new National Curriculum Statements for History (Grades 10-12) describe learning history as a process of enquiry where the emphasis is on doing history. The curriculum documents make it very clear that 'learners who study history use the insights and skills of historians'. This paper describes different approaches to history learning in schools, and asks what it means to 'do' history. Using an analysis of formal history assessment tasks in three high schools and the KwaZulu-Natal Department of Education November exemplar exam for Grade 10 in 2006, I argue that learners are mostly required to extract information from sources rather than engaging with sources 'as historians would do'. It also appears that learners are not being required to demonstrate a strong and in-depth knowledge of history. The data we...
Articulating and comparing standards through benchmarking of assessment
10th annual Australian Quality Forum, 2011
The universities of Deakin, Tasmania (UTAS) and Wollongong (UOW) are not aligned with any university groups or networks. This paper presents their cross-institutional benchmarking relationship as a case study in building the necessary trust, collaboration and shared methodology. The partnership was distinguished by the way it tapped into a collegial quality improvement culture. It had its genesis at the 2009 AUQF conference and the partners adapted and 'test-drove' a framework previously developed by an ALTC Teaching Quality Indicators Project team. UTAS and UOW had formerly been involved in a trial benchmarking project on academic transition support in 2009 and extended this partnership to Deakin. The universities are comparable in terms of establishment, discipline areas, regional presence and experience of the AUQA audit cycle, with some significant contextual differences that needed to be recognised, such as structures and terminology. They are at similar stages in relation to the development of their benchmarking policy and processes. The focus on assessment ensured the project would explore the issues central to the Cycle 2 AUQA audits, such as standards, learning outcomes and student feedback. The explicit benchmarking of assessment processes made transparent the areas of improvement and areas of good practice in relation to assessment standards. Outcomes included action plans for each university and a robust framework for benchmarking assessment.