Design of Facial Impact Protection Gear for Cyclists (original) (raw)
ABSTRACT The concept of facial impact protection mask for cyclists is proposed in response to increased participation in cycling and the need for injury prevention. The research aims to develop an approach for design of facial impact protection gear to reduce the risk of severe injury. Impact test equipment and procedure, face surrogate and protection material performance criteria are developed. Three groups of protective materials – rigid crushable, semi rigid, and soft cushion foams are tested and assessed according to criteria. The criteria are linked to measures of the risk of facial and brain injuries: HIC (Head Injury Criterion), peak deceleration, Face-bone damage and energy absorption. The impact energy is simulated by a drop test using a 48 mm-radius-steel hemispherical impactor, with a weight of 4.63 kg similar to that of headform J specified in AS/NZS standard. The drop-height is 1500 mm, and the linear deceleration force of the impactor is recorded and used to establish the performance of the materials. The HIC is used to predict the risk of brain injury, whereas the developed face surrogate is used to assess facial bone injury. A 5.4 m/s facial impact to the unprotected-face of a cyclist can result in the risk of severe facial bone fracture and mild brain injury. The impact test results for rigid foam protection of 40 mm thickness shows no densification (bottom out) and absorbs the impact energy without damage to the Foam-bone of the face surrogate. At 20 mm thickness, rigid polyurethane foams performed best with Foam-bone damage ranging from 15.1% to 20.5%. Other materials with thicknesses of 20 to 28 mm showed Foam-bone damage between 21.8% and 35.1%. The HIC values ranged from 267 to 522, with memory foams and expanded polystyrene foam having the lowest values. Peak deceleration ranged from 71 g to 105 g for the materials tested. It is concluded that the impact energy can be dissipated by the protection material thereby reducing the risk of severe facial injury to the protected area.
Related papers
Modelling head impact safety performance of polymer-based foam protective devices
"The aim of this paper is to investigate an iterative statistical procedure, based on a small and censored sample of impact test experiments, useful for interval estimation of head impact safety parameter as critical fall height of protective devices. An adaptive testing routine was developed that was mainly constituted by a series of at least four impact test experiments, followed by the comparison of at least two parameter estimates based on incremental exponential regression fittings and a final confirmation experiment. A total number of 23 protective devices, mainly made of polyethylene foam, were investigated in order to validate the adaptive routine. The routine, applied to critical fall height of protective devices, was 19 times convergent within a maximum of 6 impact test experiments. 4 times the sample was censored because the iterative procedure has exceeded the available number of specimens. Confidence intervals at the 90 % level were always less than 0.18 m. The applicability of the adaptive routine was satisfactory demonstrated with reference to devices made of PE-foam and safety threshold of peak acceleration a-max equal to 200 g. The target of a confidence interval below the state-of-art was achieved. "
Softer Foam in Bicycle Helmets Reduces the Impact Force in a Simulation Model
SVOA Paediatrics, 2023
Objective: This study compared the linear acceleration generated from an impact to a manikin's head wearing an off-the-shelf "standard" bicycle helmet (stdBH) compared to a modified bicycle helmet (modBH) (original foam replaced with softer polyolefin foam). Methods: Pairs of 5 different bicycle helmets from a wide price range ($20-$90) were tested (standard versus modified). The head impact was simulated by striking the test bicycle helmet placed onto the head of a Century BOB boxing manikin, with a conventional football helmet (4.6 kg additional weight added) swung from a 1.2 meter rope and released from an angle of 45º serially for multiple data points as in Figure 2. The manikin's bicycle helmet was struck by the football helmet in the frontal, left parietal, and occipital locations for 12 trials each. Each of three accelerometers located at the manikin's forehead, apex of the head, and right ear collected data on linear acceleration in the X, Y, and Z planes. Results: Mean linear acceleration in G's (9.8 m/sec/sec) was obtained from the three accelerometer locations on the manikin's head for each striking position. The mean linear accelerations across the 5 different helmet pairs are summarized in the graphs (Figure 3). For each of the three striking locations, there were statistically lower striking forces sustained with the modified softer foam bicycle helmet (modBH) compared to the standard bicycle helmet (stdBH). The greatest reductions were observed in the apical accelerometers when the manikin was struck from the occipital and parietal locations. Conclusion: These results suggest that softer foams in bicycle helmets may reduce injury from bicycle accidents. Further research on this topic can lead to the development of safer and more effective bicycle helmets.
Motorcycle helmet impact response: comparison of helmet type and impact severity
2006
Helmets reduce the frequency and severity of head and brain injuries over a broader range of impact severities than covered by the various impact attenuation standards. Our goal was to compare, over a wide range of impact speeds, the impact attenuation performance of a number of common helmets varying from an inexpensive, non-approved beanie helmet to high-end, DOTand Snell-approved full-face helmets. We conducted 32 single drop tests of six different helmets on a flat anvil at impact speeds of 1.2 to 10.1 m/s (energy = 3.7 to 259 J; equivalent drop heights of 7 to 518 cm). The beanie helmet reached a peak headform acceleration of 852g at 29 J and was not tested at higher energies. Three full-face and one open-face helmet responded linearly to between 290g and 345g at about 260 J, and a shorty-style helmet behaved like the fullface helmets up to 150 J, above which its acceleration rose to 663g at 242 J. Restitutions varied from 0.23 to 0.43 for the approved-helmets. Across all sever...
Study of Possible Use of Strain-rate Dependent Materials in Protective Helmets
The probability of brain injury during an accident is dependent on the force history acting on brain tissue. The mostly used criterion for the injury probability assessment, the Head Injury Criterion (HIC), is based on the time integral of force (acceleration) history curve. HIC is used in the work for the assessment of helmet performance. Because of limited weight of the helmet, current designs prefer to use foams of very low density, where the strain-rate dependency is negligible. The possibility of developing a material consuming more energy at high strain-rates without significant increase of density is challenging. The work is focused on a parametric study of a helmet with new design: the liner is made of a denser strain-rate dependent material. Because of increased weight of the helmet, the outer shell is designed thinner than those used in conventional helmets nowadays. The analysis if performed using numerical simulation software LS-DYNA. Advanced foam material models with s...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.