Implementing Quality in Spatial Data Infrastructures (original) (raw)
Related papers
Spatial data quality and its evaluation
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 1994
Abstract This paper reviews recent concepts of data quality assessment and presents a model for data quality evaluation. Data quality may be acquired in a static state by quantitative or qualitative testing, or in an operational state by tracking what processing ...
Rules and Standards for Spatial Data Quality in GIS Environments
In the last thirty years the need to associate geographical data to quality specifications has become particularly evident. Digital spatial data of different origins and quality are usually integrated in GIS environments, by determining an indefinite level of global accuracy in such systems. Moreover, the introduction of GIS in the mapping process has produced a completely new type of user different from the traditional map user.
Spatial data quality assessment in GIS
2013
The paper aims to present the main issues related to spatial data quality assessment for a given dataset. There were described the elements and subelements of the data quality evaluation according with ISO (International Organization for Standardization) standards on geographic information. The analysis on dataset reveals some difficulties and limitation in evaluation of quality elements. Key-Words: data quality, accuracy, error, geospatial, topology, standards, ISO.
Spatial Data Quality: Problems and Prospects
Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, 2009
This paper reflects upon the topic of spatial data quality and the progress made in this field over the past 20-30 years. While international standards have been established, theoretical models of error developed, new visualization techniques introduced, and metadata now routinely documented for spatial datasets, difficulties nevertheless exist with the way data quality information is being described, communicated and applied in practice by users. These problems are identified and the paper suggests how the spatial information community might move forward to overcome these obstacles.
Spatial data quality: From metadata to quality indicators and contextual end-user manual
The context within which geospatial data are used has changed significantly during the past ten years. Users have now easier access to geospatial data but typically have less knowledge in the geographical information domain, so have limited knowledge of the risk related to the use of geospatial data. This sometimes leads to faulty decision-making that may have significant consequences. In order to reduce these risks, geospatial data producers provide metadata to help users to assess the fitness for use of the data they are using within the context of their application. However, experience shows that these metadata have several limitations and do not reach their information goal for this new group of non-expert users. In addition, geospatial data are becoming a mass product that has to follow legal requirements related to this class of products. Metadata, as currently defined, do not reach these obligations, especially concerning the requirements for easily understood information abo...
Modern techniques for evaluation of spatial data quality
For centuries ago cartographers, geographers, surveyors and geodesists have been involved in collection, storage, analysis and visualization of spatial data. The collections of spatial data are subject to random, systematic and gross errors. In the last decade GIS became the main tool for analyzing spatial data in many real life activities. The quality of the geographical information systems is dependent on the quality of the stored and queried data. In comparison with the non-geographic information systems, in GIS applications, the quality of data has a greater influence on the results. Despite the arguments in favor of explicit treatment of spatial data quality, usually Cadastre and GIS practice continues to proceed as if data were perfect. The objectives of this study are to identify different techniques for evaluation of spatial data quality
Proceedings of the Third Turkish-German Joint Geodetic Days, June 1-4, Istanbul, pp.15-30, 1999
Although the primary objective of any Geographic Information System is to produ ce information in support of decision making on geo-related issues, it is overemp hasized that the quality of such decisions is subjected to the quality of the spatial data upon which they are based. Since the quality is defined as "confirmation to t he specifications" from the producers' point of view and "fitness for use" from the users' point of view, spatial data quality seems to be a subjective measure to dea l with. The increasing use of spatial data with new computer technologies needs not only positional accuracy but also other quality parameters, such as feature an d attribute accuracy, consistency, completeness, up-to-dateness (currency) and li neage. This paper introduces the spatial data quality concept together with error sources and explains spatial data quality standards covering quality terminology, spatial data quality model (parameters & measures), acceptable quality levels an d spatial data quality evaluation model.
Spatium, 2004
We are witnessing nowadays that the last decade of the past century, as well as the first years of the present one, have brought technology expansion with respect to spatial data gathering and processing which makes a physical basis for management of spatial development. This has resulted in enlargement of the spatial data market. New technologies, presented in computer applications, have greatly expanded the number of users of these products.