Reflections on Comparing Federalisms: Canada and the United States (original) (raw)
Related papers
Federalism, political structure, and public policy in the United States and Canada
Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2000
Two of the three large countries on the North American continent-the United States and Canadashare a number of similarities that often make it difficult for the untrained observer to differentiate between the two nations. On the surface, the two are structured similarly as federal systems that, by definition, exhibit shared power between the national government and provincial or state political entities.
Canadian Federalism: A System of Flexibility and Adaptability
Federalism-E
The current edition is largely based within a Canadian context, though we did receive article submissions from as far away as Russia. Specifically, change is a recurring theme underlying and tying the various articles in this edition together. Federalism is not a stagnate form of governance, especially within a large, diverse polity such as Canada. In this regard, Canada serves as a case study of the challenges faced by other conciliatory federations. The current journal has been ordered chronologically to provide a stream of historical and contemporary accounts that demonstrates the constant need for adaptation to deal with change within the Canadian federal system. Though some issues researched in this journal may seem to be nothing more than historical, their impacts on Canadian politics still resonate today for each author, while researching a specific topic is at the same time addressing generic concerns about the nature of the Canadian Federation; concerns that need to be addr...
Making Sense of Canada as a Federal System: the Relevance of Historical Legacies
This paper was first presented at a conference organized by Michael Burgess and Cesar Colino at Howfield Manor, near Canterbury (Kent, England). The main historical legacies at work in Canada, according at least to this paper, are the role of the state, the British heritage, the idea of federalism and autonomy, and the role of Québec.
The Value of Comparative Federalism
2020
This book explores new avenues of international research in comparative federal studies. It reexamines the conceptual tools and methodologies for understanding federal systems, and the role of comparative federalism in the dissemination and implementation of federal concepts. It highlights the influence of comparative federalism on constitution-making as well as constitutional reforms. The volume provides innovative and pragmatic perspectives from both the Global North and the Global South, with case studies drawn from established federations such as India, Canada, Australia, and Austria, and emerging federal systems such as Italy and South Africa. Advocating a combined approach that integrates modern and traditional theoretical routes with practical insights and contemporary analyses, it discusses the issues of multilevel elections and federal governance; coalition governments and multiparty democracy in parliamentary federal systems, such as India; minority empowerment; gender budgeting; self-governance; multinational federalism; unitary states; the nation-state; and degenerating federalism. It also breaks new ground by looking at federalism from a gender perspective and deals with tools for measuring fiscal responsibility, and a social and cultural index. A tribute to the intellectual legacy of Ronald L. Watts, this volume will be useful to scholars and researchers of political science, federalism, comparative federal studies, political studies, comparative politics, governance, public administration and law, development studies, South Asian studies, and Global South and North studies as well policymakers, international government bodies, research institutes, development experts, and other organisations working in the area.
The Oxford Handbook of the Canadian Constitution, 2017
This chapter documents the evolution from a dualist - “watertight compartments” - conception of Canadian federalism, to one that must acknowledge an increased number of intergovernmental cooperative ventures. It first examines Canada’s fundamentally dualist federal architecture before looking at the empirical reality of cooperative federalism which frequently challenges this structural dualism. It then considers how the rise of cooperative federalism influenced the evolution of the interpretive doctrines underpinning the law of Canadian federalism. Finally, it analyses the normative strength and scope of cooperative federalism, concluding that the impact of cooperative federalism in Canadian constitutional law remains tamed by the dualist conception of federalism that still underlies the Supreme Court of Canada’s federalism case law.
Deconstructing The New Federalism
Canadian Political Science Review, 2010
The appearance or imminent arrival of a 'new federalism' has been a repeated theme in the study of federal-provincial relations in Canada and in the pronouncements of Canadian governments. At the same time, there clearly is a strong path dependency effect that acts as a check or limitation on the scope of change that federal governments can accomplish, leaving Canadian history littered with the corpses of 'new federalisms' that have never been realized. While there is much that separates recent scholarly interventions on the new federalism, all recognize the need to restore a greater measure of political legitimacy and functionality in federal-provincial relations by building consensus on rules and norms of behavior. This paper surveys the history of 'the new federalism' as a political strategy and program, and analyzes the competing interpretations of the concept that are currently on offer. I conclude that policy challenges looming on the horizon will demand a coordinated and multilevel response from governments, making it likely that whatever new federalism emerges will continue the trend toward shared jurisdiction and policy-making, rather than disentanglement.
Comparative Federalism uses a comparative approach to explore the contemporary nature and meanings of federalism and federation. Providing both a detailed theoretical examination and fresh case studies, it clearly distinguishes between 'federation', a particular kind of state, and 'feder-alism', the thinking that drives and promotes it. Written in a lucid and accessible style, this new text: • analyses the conceptual bases of federalism and federation through the evolution of the intellectual debate on federalism, the American federal experience, the origins of federal states and the relationship between state-building and national integration; • explores comparative federalism and federation, looking at five main pathways into comparative analysis via empirical studies on the USA, and the EU; • explores the pathology of federations-looking at failures, successes and the impact of globalisation-and concludes with an assessment of federal theory. This book will be of great interest to students and researchers of federalism, devolution, comparative politics and government.