Aberrant, noninfectious HIV-1 particles are released by chronically infected human T cells transduced with a retroviral vector expressing an interfering HIV-1 variant (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of virology, 1995
Gene therapy may be of benefit in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected individuals by virtue of its ability to inhibit virus replication and prevent viral gene expression. It is not known whether anti-HIV-1 gene therapy strategies based on antisense or transdominant HIV-1 mutant proteins can inhibit the replication and expression of clinical HIV-1 isolates in primary CD4+ T lymphocytes. We therefore transduced CD4+ T lymphocytes from uninfected individuals with retroviral vectors expressing either HIV-1-specific antisense-TAR or antisense-Tat/Rev RNA, transdominant HIV-1 Rev protein, and a combination of antisense-TAR and transdominant Rev. The engineered CD4+ T lymphocytes were then infected with four different clinical HIV-1 isolates. We found that replication of all HIV-1 isolates was inhibited by all the anti-HIV vectors tested. Greater inhibition of HIV-1 was observed with transdominant Rev than with antisense RNA. We hereby demonstrated effective protection by ...
Virology, 1995
An Hut-78 cell clone (F12) harboring a nonproducer human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) variant, and showing a complete resistance to HIV-1 or HIV-2 superinfection, was previously characterized. We demonstrated that the replication of the superinfecting HIVs is blocked at the retrotranecription step, despite the CD4 down-regulation, since HIVe are able to cross the Hut-78/F12 cell membrane. In order to establish if the expression of the HIV-1 variant (F12/HIV) could be per se sufficient to induce the homologous viral interference shown in the F12 cells, the whole F12/HIV provirus was cloned and transfected in He-La CD4+ cells. In F12/HIV expressing He-La CD4+ clones, both the viral proteins expressed and the HIV nonproducer phenotype remain unmodified compared to F12 cells. Furthermore, despite the full expression of CD4 HIV receptors, the life cycle of the superinfecting HIV could be either strongly inl-]ibited or totally abolished, depending on the cell clone considered. The inhibition of the euperinfecting HIV was also reproduced when an HIV infectious molecular clone was transfected in F12/HIV He-La CD4+ clones, thus indicating that a post-cDNA synthesis block may operate against the superinfecting HIV. These data demonstrate that HIV susceptibility could be abrogated in cells expressing the F12/HIV genome, even in absence of any CD4 down-regulation.
Journal of virology, 1996
It is thought that interference during human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is established by downmodulation of the principal virus receptor, CD4. Here we present evidence to the contrary. At various times after primary infection, we superinfected T cells in vitro by exposure to a genetically distinct viral clone or to a virus carrying the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. Replication of each virus strain was determined by restriction enzyme analysis of total cellular DNA, by PCR amplification of viral DNA, or by assay of cell extracts for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase activity. We found that efficient viral interference is established within 24 h of infection at a multiplicity of infection of 1. At that time, expression of viral structural proteins was low and infected cells displayed undiminished levels of surface CD4 and were fully susceptible to virus binding and fusion. Superinfection by either cell-free HIV-1 or cocultivation was blocked. Cells resis...
Journal of General Virology, 1993
A human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1-infected Hut-78 cell clone (F12) shows a peculiar phenotype: it exhibits an altered viral protein pattern, is a nonproducer and is resistant to homologous superinfection. To determine whether this phenotype is dependent upon the expression of the HIV-1 genome integrated therein, the SstI/SstI FI2 provirus [deprived of HIV long terminal repeats (LTRs)] was cloned and inserted in the pLj retroviral vector bearing the neomycin (neo) and Geneticin resistance gene. CD4 + HIV-susceptible CEMss cells (a CEM clone able to form large syncytia 2 to 3 days post-HIV infection) were infected with the recombinant retroviruses rescued from the F12/HIV-pLj-transfected (in either sense or antisense orientation) amphotropic packaging cells PA 317. Neo sense resistant gene clones showed approximately 10 copies of viral DNA/cell (without detectable major deletions) only in episomal form, low viral RNA expression and a viral protein pattern characterized by an uncleaved gpl60, no gp41 and little, if any, p55 gagprecursor (as in F12 cells). Superinfection of these F12/HIV DNA-engineered clones with HIV-1 resulted in a significant reduction in the yield of superinfecting HIV. This effect (more pronounced when the clones were maintained under neo selective pressure) was observed in all five retrovirusinfected clones exhibiting the presence and expression of sense episomal F12/HIV DNA but not in two clones bearing an antisense F12/HIV DNA or in one clone bearing only the pLj vector. These results indicate that bio-engineered human CD4 + cells expressing the F12/ HIV genome exhibit a significant resistance to HIV superinfection.
1996
We have previously postulated that the binding of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) to cell surface CD4 induces signal transduction pathways that down-modulate production of progeny virions in acutely infected T cells (M. Tremblay, S. Meloche, S. Gratton, M. A. Wainberg, and R.-P. Sékaly, EMBO J. 13:774-783, 1994). To evaluate the possibility that CD4 cross-linking might indeed affect viral gene expression, we have introduced a molecular construct made of the luciferase reporter gene placed under the control of the regulatory elements of HIV-1 in several CD4-positive T-cell lines. We found that cross-linking of CD4 with defective HIV-1 particles and heat-inactivated viruses inhibits long terminal repeat-dependent luciferase expression. Experiments revealed that the gp120-CD4 interaction was necessary to repress HIV-1 long terminal repeat-dependent luciferase activity. The cytoplasmic domain of CD4 was also found to be required for this effect to occur. The virus-mediated signal transduction was shown to be mediated via p56 lck -dependent and -independent pathways. These results indicate that the earliest event in the HIV-1 replicative cycle, namely, the binding of the virus to its cellular receptor, can lead to signal transduction culminating in down-modulation of viral gene expression. Thus we propose that defective viruses could regulate the pathogenesis of HIV disease as they constitute the vast majority of circulating HIV-1 particles.
Human immunodeficiency virus grown in CD4-expressing cells is associated with CD4
1996
Using a CD4-capture immunoassay for gp120, several strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) grown in CD4-expressing T lymphoblastoid cells were found to contain little CD4reactive gp120 (0.3-1.0 ng/ml) relative to virus titre (103L10 s° TCIDso/ml) and p24 antigen (80-1000ng/ml). The measured CD4-reactive gp120 concentrations of HIV-1 suspensions grown in CD4-negative human neuroblastoma cells were 100-to lO000-fold greater than those of HIV-1 grown in CD4-positive lymphoblastoid cells, even though both virus suspensions contained abundant viral gp120 as shown by immunoblot assay. It was postulated that CD4 derived from host cells might be associated with virions, concealing the binding domains of gp120. CD4 association with HIV-1 virions grown in CD4-positive cells was demonstrated directly by immunoblot assay of sucrose gradient-purified virus suspensions and by specific co-sedimentation of lZSl-labelled OKT4 with virions propagated in CD4-expressing cells. CD4 coating of primary HIV-1 isolates grown in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was also observed. The biological significance of CD4 coating of HIV particles remains to be determined.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1996
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 2, the second AIDS-associated human retrovirus, differs from HIV-1 in its natural history, infectivity, and pathogenicity, as well as in details of its genomic structure and molecular behavior. We report here that HIV-2 inhibits the replication of HIV-1 at the molecular level. This inhibition was selective, dose-dependent, and nonreciprocal. The closely related simian immunodeficiency provirus also inhibited HIV-1. The selectivity of inhibition was shown by the observation that HIV-2 did not significantly downmodulate the expression of the unrelated murine leukemia virus; neither did the murine leukemia virus markedly affect HIV-1 or HIV-2 expression. Moreover, while HIV-2 potently inhibited HIV-1, the reverse did not happen, thus identifying yet another and remarkable difference between HIV-1 and HIV-2. Mutational analysis of the HIV-2 genome suggested that the inhibition follows a complex pathway, possibly involving multiple genes and redund...
Journal of virology, 1998
We previously demonstrated that expression of the nonproducer F12-human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) variant induces a block in the replication of superinfecting HIV that does not depend on the down-regulation of CD4 HIV receptors. In order to individuate the gene(s) involved in F12-HIV-induced interference, vectors expressing each of the nine F12-HIV proteins were transfected in HIV-susceptible HeLa CD4 cells. Pools of cell clones stably producing each viral protein were infected with HIV-1, and virus release was measured in terms of reverse transcriptase activity in supernatants. We hereby demonstrate that HeLa CD4 cells expressing the F12-HIV gag, vif, or nef gene were resistant, to different degrees, to infection with T-cell-line-adapted HIV-1 strains. Conversely, expression of either the tat, rev, or vpu F12-HIV gene increased the rate of HIV release, and no apparent effects on HIV replication were observed in cells expressing either the F12-HIV vpr, pol, or env gene. ...