Historical archaeology in South Africa: material culture of the Dutch East India Company at the Cape (original) (raw)
Related papers
In her special editorial to the December 2014 issue of the South African Archaeological Bulletin, the longest serving editor in Bulletin history, Janette Deacon, provides an overview of the history of this journal up until 2005, the year in which the editorship passed to the Association of Southern African Professional Archaeologists (ASAPA). She notes that 2005 marked ‘a major change’ for the Bulletin. I was part of the 2005 ASAPA editorial team and I provide, in this paper, some of the backstory to this change.
1992
Investigations in the archaeologically unexplored region of Namaqualand show that it was unoccupied for much of the terminal Pleistocene and early Holocene. Marginally more favourable climatic conditions circa 2000 BP encouraged re-occupation of the region. It would appear that Khoe-speaking hunter-gatherers with livestock and pottery first entered Namaqualand along the Orange River before moving southward along the Atlantic coast. Both sheep and pottery are present at IAi tomas in the Richtersveld and Spoeg River Cave on the coast, some 1900 years ago. This is strong evidence for a western route of Khoekhoen dispersal into southern Africa and invalidates one of the hypotheses proposed by Elphick in 1972. Domestic stock was initially only a minor addition to the economy and these early inhabitants of the region continued utilising wild plant foods and game, slaughtering their domestic stock only infrequently. It is proposed that hunter-gatherer society may undergo the structural cha...
WIT Transactions on the Built Environment, 2003
This paper provides a brief overview of the maritime cultural heritage of South Africa and some of the constraints that have characterized the development of maritime archaeology in the country. From this more general frame of reference, attention will focus on one specific geographical region. For thousands of years, the Table Bay area has been a meeting point for indigenous people, but during the last 500 years also for others. Besides that, the development of maritime archaeological research since the late 1980s has been concentrating on this region. In the second section, an indication is given of the archaeological potential of Table Bay. From there, attention focuses on four case studies. These relate to different types of archaeological sites that date to different periods, whereas individual research designs and the fieldwork methodology that is being followed for each of them varies. By discussing these projects, it will be demonstrated how diverse South African maritime ar...
Journal of Southern African Studies, 2022
This article investigates the historicity of Gideon von Wielligh’s collection of |xam folklore, history, and observational accounts published predominantly in Afrikaans during the early 20th century. Von Wielligh’s collection is often portrayed as suspect in relation to the ‘great’ |xam archive, namely that of Wilhelm Bleek and Lucy Lloyd – with accusations of plagiarism a common charge. Through a holographic archaeological reading, an approach conceptualised by drawing on linguistic archaeology and philology specifically, and the holographic paradigm and archaeology of knowledge in general, the article analyses the traces of |xam in Von Wielligh’s otherwise Afrikaans texts. The reading focuses on Von Wielligh’s texts on the one hand and Specimens of Bushman Folklore (1911) on the other. Since Specimens was the only selection from the Bleek and Lloyd archive to which von Wielligh had access when he published his collection between 1919 and 1921, it is, within holographic archaeological terms, the ‘urtext’ or ‘source of certainty’. In contrast, von Wielligh’s texts are regarded as the ‘source of suspicion’, with the |xam linguistic data within it ‘dated’ in relation to Specimens. The analysis leads to the following three conclusions: first, von Wielligh’s command of |xam linguistic data validates the authenticity of the collection; second, we can use von Wielligh’s recordings to change the idea of the extant |xam archive in a way that challenges the fixation on Bleek and Lloyd; third, the politics of intellectual history, such as the defaming of von Wielligh, is tied not simply to ideas but to the history of the book as a material object. This acknowledgement and changed perspective on the |xam and the available records could, in turn, lead to deeper and more generative research on the |xam specifically, Khoesan studies generally and South (and southern) African studies more broadly.