Facebook use leads to health-care reform in Taiwan (original) (raw)
Related papers
Use of Social Media in Medicine: A Double-edged sword?
Education in Medicine Journal, 2013
Social Media (SM) is changing the way physicians and patients interact. SM is one of the drivers towards a more patient-centric model of healthcare. It offers a platform for health communications, empowerment and even possibly strengthening the physician-patient relationship. The use of SM in medicine has often brought on a lot of feedback, more negative than positive ones. The academic literature is commonly seen with articles on SM and how it poses dangers and risks to medical personnel. Many SM usage guidelines are also geared towards the expectations of misuse rather than positive considerations and constructive use. There is a need to assess its impact and utilisation in medicine, through processes such as consultation, education and creation of awareness, communications, interaction and sharing of information. The culture of medicine is one that values confidentiality, privacy, one to one interaction and very professional conduct. This is often thought to be contrasting to that of SM, which involves open sharing, connectivity and is thus, more informal. Despite the contrasting cultures, a significant proportion of medical personnel do use or are on SM platforms. Participation in SM networking and other similar internet sites can support physicians' personal expression, enable individual physicians to have presence online, foster collegiality and camaraderie within the profession and provide opportunities to disseminate public health messages and other health communications. If properly and adequately used, within acceptable framework, SM can indeed be a boon, rather than a bane to medicine.
Use of Social Media in Medicine: A Double-edged sword? Fatimah Lateef
Social Media (SM) is changing the way physicians and patients interact. SM is one of the drivers towards a more patient-centric model of healthcare. It offers a platform for health communications, empowerment and even possibly strengthening the physician-patient relationship. The use of SM in medicine has often brought on a lot of feedback, more negative than positive ones. The academic literature is commonly seen with articles on SM and how it poses dangers and risks to medical personnel. Many SM usage guidelines are also geared towards the expectations of misuse rather than positive considerations and constructive use. There is a need to assess its impact and utilisation in medicine, through processes such as consultation, education and creation of awareness, communications, interaction and sharing of information. The culture of medicine is one that values confidentiality, privacy, one to one interaction and very professional conduct. This is often thought to be contrasting to that of SM, which involves open sharing, connectivity and is thus, more informal. Despite the contrasting cultures, a significant proportion of medical personnel do use or are on SM platforms. Participation in SM networking and other similar internet sites can support physicians' personal expression, enable individual physicians to have presence online, foster collegiality and camaraderie within the profession and provide opportunities to disseminate public health messages and other health communications. If properly and adequately used, within acceptable framework, SM can indeed be a boon, rather than a bane to medicine.
Dangers and Opportunities for Social Media in Medicine
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2013
Health professionals have begun using social media to benefit patients, enhance professional networks, and advance understanding of individual and contextual factors influencing public health. However, discussion of the dangers of these technologies in medicine has overwhelmed consideration of positive applications. This article summarizes the hazards of social media in medicine and explores how changes in functionality on sites like Facebook may make these technologies less perilous for health professionals. Finally, it describes the most promising avenues through which professionals can use social media in medicine-improving patient communication, enhancing professional development, and contributing to public health research and service.
Information Technology and Social Media: Changing Paradigm of Medicine Practice
IOSR Journals , 2019
Background: Medical knowledge is a very dynamic subject which gets updated with addition of new studies, reviews and case reports. Though most of the clinical practice is based on guidelines and studies, still there is a small grey area which gives room to a clinician to apply his mind in the interpretation of the investigations and imaging in relation with the symptoms and signs in a particular case to reach to a certain diagnosis and decide management accordingly. Internet and social media has widened the horizon of dissemination of medical knowledge and information technology has brought it to the every smartphone user which is just a click away. However it also has added the information which is unfiltered, occasionally biased and at times not substantiated by adequate evidence. This has added confusion about medical knowledge, anxiety of the patients and distrust amongst caregiver and recipients. Consumer Protection Act in creating an environment of fear and apprehension. The impact of this apprehension is very significant in developing countries in the terms of cost of healthcare. Application of sound clinical judgement is replaced by plethora of investigations and added to the expenditure of public money. This has also increased litigations and conflict between patients and health institution. It is unjustified to say that everything is bad with this dissemination of information. This awareness of population has helped in prevention of various life style diseases also. Aim: To create awareness of healthcare providers about impact of increased information amongst the service seekers and customise the soft skills in dealing with the patients. It is also for the policy makers to take note of information dissemination and their impact on healthcare. Material and methods: Internet research, Daily news and updates in the healthcare practice and personal experience of the authors is used as source for making of this article. Conclusion-Unless the population is educated, aware and appreciate the grey area of clinical practice, this half-baked recipe of readily available medical knowledge is detrimental to human being and society. Therefore, a stringent regulation is a must to regulate content over social media so as to get the optimum utilisation of the same in betterment of healthcare.
Medical Professional and Usage of Social Media
Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science
Social media connect people by sharing text, photos, audio and videos among themselves. Medical professional and patients also communicate through social media; however, issues of privacy and confidentiality of medical professions in regards to medical and health care decisions contradict with the openness of the usage of social media. Member of the medical profession can use social media but need to abide by the code of conduct of medical ethics in order to render the best possible services. This paper emphasizes on the needs of inclusion of social media usage in future health care providers' curriculum by the higher educational institutions in order to aware of the ethical and professional aspect.
Patient Education and Counseling, 2013
Objective: To investigate patients' and health professionals' (a) motives and use of social media for health-related reasons, and (b) barriers and expectations for health-related social media use. Methods: We conducted a descriptive online survey among 139 patients and 153 health care professionals in obstetrics and gynecology. In this survey, we asked the respondents about their motives and use of social network sites (SNS: Facebook and Hyves), Twitter, LinkedIn, and YouTube. Results: Results showed that patients primarily used Twitter (59.9%), especially for increasing knowledge and exchanging advice and Facebook (52.3%), particularly for social support and exchanging advice. Professionals primarily used LinkedIn (70.7%) and Twitter (51.2%), for communication with their colleagues and marketing reasons. Patients' main barriers for social media use were privacy concerns and unreliability of the information. Professionals' main barriers were inefficiency and lack of skills. Both patients and professionals expected future social media use, provided that they can choose their time of social media usage.
Social Media and Medical Professionalism
Archives of Internal Medicine, 2012
A surge of interest in debating the uses of social networking media-blogs and microblogs (Twitter), social net working sites (Facebook, Myspace), and content sharing sites (YouTube, Flickr)-is occurring among medical associations, medical educators, and researchers. 1 Despite emerging studies that suggest benefits of social media to enhance medical practice, the published literature remains dominated by strong concerns about its perceived abuses. These social media risks are typically framed in worries about medical pro fessionalism, and social media use is discussed as a matter of professional ethics. Two examples of this framing are the new teaching modules focusing on avoiding risky behavior 2 and the codes of "eprofessionalism" 3 that are proliferating in medical schools and hospitals.