The integrative role of the project management office in the front end of innovation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Exploring management control in radical innovation projects
European Journal of Innovation Management, 2009
PurposeThis paper seeks to endorse the management control system taxonomy by Robert Simons to explore whether, how and why different approaches to management control are more intensely employed: in different phases of the radical innovation process; and in innovation projects showing different degrees of radicalness. Moreover, it aims to discuss the influence exerted by some contextual variables.Design/methodology/approachCase studies concerning four innovation projects (two radical in nature and two incremental) implemented by two companies operating in the home automation industry in Italy were conducted.FindingsIt is found that radical innovation projects, especially in the early stages of development, are characterized by a stronger reliance on flexible and social control management systems, while diagnostic control mainly emerges in late development and commercialization. Moreover, the moderating effect of the hypothesized contingent variables is widely discussed.Research limit...
Project Management Journal, 2020
This article explores the extent to which innovations are driven by the project management office (PMO), an internal unit within owner and operator organizations that is responsible for overall project assurance and control. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with organizational members of Transport for London (TfL), a public transport owner and operator organization and a key stakeholder in the UK infrastructure sector. This was combined with the analysis of four project assurance reviews initiated and delivered by TfL. The findings demonstrate that the PMO provides opportunities for building and enhancing innovative capabilities of the owner and operator organization.
Management in the Innovation Project
Journal of Knowledge …, 2011
The object of this research is to identify the sources of risk in innovation projects and to determine whether they could be managed better. Due to the diversity of opinions and theories over the nature of risk, reaching an agreement about risk management is difficult. ...
Valentyn Rach
The article summarizes the arguments and counterarguments within the scientific discussion on the quantification of various spheres of enterprise activity based on their system representation. The main purpose of the study is to improve the basic model of systemic economics as the basis for developing a method for quantitative assessment of the harmonious process of development of innovative project-oriented enterprises. The systematization of literary sources and approaches to solving the problem of choosing a basic model has shown that the most reasonable and developed approach is based on the model of economic tetrad. Various authors used the model when developing indicators of balance and stability of economic systems. However, the known results were not compared, and the model was not used to describe the innovative development of enterprises. The urgency to solve this scientific problem is in the fact that in the era of the knowledge economy, innovation development is becoming one of the main directions of the activity of modern enterprises, which needs the scientific ground. Studying of the point related to creation of a method for quantitative assessment of the innovative project-oriented enterprises development is carried out in the following logical sequence: making the economic tetrad matching requirements of the system integrity and completeness; conducting an analysis of resource interchange in the triad of the economic tetrad; revealing the essence of the mechanism for managing processes of growth and development of enterprises; developing a mathematical apparatus to describe the dynamic structural changes of enterprises; conducting a computer experiment using five different approaches to calculating the indicators of dynamic structural changes during the introduction of innovations; conducting a comparative analysis of the results. The methodical toolkit of the research considers the postulates of systematicity, scale, harmony, and positions of qualitative mathematics and the triple convolution method. The object of the study is the selected phases of the innovation project life cycle since they determine the peculiarities of the dynamic structural changes of enterprises during the introduction of innovations. The article presents the results of the empirical analysis, carried out based on computer modeling of the innovation project implementation within six different approaches. This showed a fundamentally different nature of the change in structural balance indicators for these approaches. The study theoretically proves and empirically confirms that the proposed indicator of the internal coherence of opposite actions (chaotic and organized) corresponds to the logic of the harmonious implementation of innovation activity. The results of the study can be applied when creating monitoring and management systems for the development of innovative project-oriented enterprises.