Dosimetry for Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation in Radiation Therapy Patients (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2009
Dosimetric calculations are performed with an increasing frequency before or after treatment in targeted radionuclide therapy, as well as for radiation protection purposes in diagnostic nuclear medicine. According to the MIRD committee formalism, the mean absorbed dose to a target is given by the product of the cumulated activity and a dose-conversion factor, known as the S factor. Standard S factors have been published for mathematic phantoms and for unit-density spheres. The accuracy of the results from the use of these S factors is questionable, because patient morphology can vary significantly. The aim of this work was to investigate differences between patient-specific dosimetric results obtained using Monte Carlo methodology and results obtained using S factors calculated on standard models. Methods: The CT images of 9 patients, who ranged in size, were used. Patient-specific S factors for 131 I were calculated with the MCNPX2.5.0 Monte Carlo code using a tool for personalized internal dose assessment, OEDIPE; standard S factors from OLINDA/EXM were compared against the patient-specific S factors. Furthermore, realistic biodistributions and cumulated activities for normal organs and tumors were used, and mean organ-and tumor-absorbed doses calculated with OEDIPE and OLINDA/EXM were compared. Results: The ratio of the standard and the patient-specific S factors were between 0.49 and 1.84 for a target distant from the source for 4 organs and 2 tumors studied as source and targets. For the case of self-irradiation, the equivalent ratio ranged between 0.45 and 2.47 and between 1.00 and 1.06 when mass correction was applied. Differences in mean absorbed doses were as high as 140% when realistic cumulated activity values were used. These values decreased to less than 26% in all cases studied when mass correction was applied to the self-irradiation given by OLINDA/EXM. Conclusion: Standard S factors can yield mean absorbed doses for normal organs or tumors with a reasonable accuracy (26% for the cases studied) as compared with absorbed doses calculated with Monte Carlo, provided that they have been corrected for mass.
Accurate Accumulation of Dose for Improved Understanding of Radiation Effects in Normal Tissue
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2010
The actual distribution of radiation dose accumulated in normal tissues over the complete course of radiation therapy is, in general, poorly quantified. Differences in the patient anatomy between planning and treatment can occur gradually (e.g., tumor regression, resolution of edema) or relatively rapidly (e.g., bladder filling, breathing motion) and these undermine the accuracy of the planned dose distribution. Current efforts to maximize the therapeutic ratio require models that relate the true accumulated dose to clinical outcome. The needed accuracy can only be achieved through the development of robust methods that track the accumulation of dose within the various tissues in the body. Specific needs include the development of segmentation methods, tissuemapping algorithms, uncertainty estimation, optimal schedules for image-based monitoring, and the development of informatics tools to support subsequent analysis. These developments will not only improve radiation outcomes modeling but will address the technical demands of the adaptive radiotherapy paradigm. The next 5 years need to see academia and industry bring these tools into the hands of the clinician and the clinical scientist.
Skin dose during radiotherapy: a summary and general estimation technique
Journal of applied clinical medical physics / American College of Medical Physics, 2012
The skin dose associated with radiotherapy may be of interest for clinical evaluation or investigating the risk of late effects. However, skin dose is not intuitive and is difficult to measure. Our objectives were to develop and evaluate a general estimation technique for skin dose based on treatment parameters. The literature on skin dose was supplemented with measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Using all available data, a general dosimetry system was developed (in the form of a series of equations) to estimate skin dose based on treatment parameters including field size, the presence of a block tray, and obliquity of the treatment field. For out-of-field locations, the distance from the field edge was also considered. This dosimetry system was then compared to TLD measurements made on the surface of a phantom. As compared to measurements, the general dosimetry system was able to predict skin dose within, on average, 21% of the local dose (4% of the Dmax dose). Skin dose for ...
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
The aim of this study is to validate the RayStation Monte Carlo (MC) dose algorithm using animal tissue neck phantoms and a water breast phantom. Methods: Three anthropomorphic phantoms were used in a clinical setting to test the RayStation MC dose algorithm. We used two real animal necks that were cut to a workable shape while frozen and then thawed before being CT scanned. Secondly, we made a patient breast phantom using a breast prosthesis filled with water and placed on a flat surface. Dose distributions in the animal and breast phantoms were measured using the MatriXX PT device. Results: The measured doses to the neck and breast phantoms compared exceptionally well with doses calculated by the analytical pencil beam (APB) and MC algorithms. The comparisons between APB and MC dose calculations and MatriXX PT measurements yielded an average depth difference for best gamma agreement of <1 mm for the neck phantoms. For the breast phantom better average gamma pass rates between measured and calculated dose distributions were observed for the MC than for the APB algorithms. Conclusions: The MC dose calculations are more accurate than the APB calculations for the static phantoms conditions we evaluated, especially in areas where significant inhomogeneous interfaces are traversed by the beam.
A B S T R A C T One of the main criteria that must be held in Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is the uniformity of dose in the body. In TBI procedures the certification that the prescribed doses are absorbed in organs is made with dosimeters positioned on the patient skin. In this work, we modelled TBI scenarios in the MCNPX code to estimate the entrance dose rate in the skin for comparison and validation of simulations with experimental measurements from literature. Dose rates were estimated simulating an ionization chamber laterally positioned on thorax, abdomen, leg and thigh. Four exposure scenarios were simulated: ionization chamber (S1), TBI room (S2), and patient represented by hybrid phantom (S3) and water stylized phantom (S4) in sitting posture. The posture of the patient in experimental work was better represented by S4 compared with hybrid phantom, and this led to minimum and maximum percentage differences of 1.31% and 6.25% to experimental measurements for thorax and thigh regions, respectively. As for all simulations reported here the percentage differences in the estimated dose rates were less than 10%, we considered that the obtained results are consistent with experimental measurements and the modelled scenarios are suitable to estimate the absorbed dose in organs during TBI procedure.
A survey of current in vivo radiotherapy dosimetry practice
The British Journal of Radiology, 1997
A questionnaire was sent out to 57 radiotherapy physics departments in the United Kingdom to determine the type of dosemeters used for in vivo measurements inside and outside X-ray treatment fields, and whether any correction is made for energy dependence when the dose to critical organs outside the main beam is estimated. 44 responses were received. 11 centres used a semiconductor for central axis dosimetry compared with only two centres which used thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD). 37 centres carried out dosimetry measurements outside the main beam; 25 centres used TLD and 12 centres used a semiconductor detector. Of the 16 centres measuring the dose at both sites, 11 used a semiconductor for the central axis measurement, but only four of those 11 changed to TLD for critical organ dosimetry despite the latter's lower variation in energy response. None of the centres stated that they made a correction for the variation in detector energy response when making measurements outside the main beam, indicating a need for a more detailed evaluation of the energy response of these detectors and the energy spectra outside the main beam.
In Vivo Dosimetry in Total Body Irradiation
2019
Total Body Irradiation (TBI) is a radiotherapy technique that consists of irradiating homogeneously the whole patients body and it is characterized by extended source to surface distances and the use of large irradiation fields. The limitations of the available input data and inherent problems with the calculation procedures make it very difficult to accurately determine the dose distributions in TBI. For these reasons, it is highly recommended to use In Vivo Dosimetry (IVD), to guarantee the quality of TBI treatments as a direct measurement of the delivered dose. An IVD QA system was implemented based on semiconductor diodes and radiochromic films. For the commissioning of the system, both detector types were calibrated independently. This guarantees the traceability of the measurements. An assessment was made on the sources of uncertainties. A tolerance level of ±10% was established for the combined contribution of both computational and experimental uncertainties. An experiment t...