Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study (original) (raw)

Reproducibility of bone mineral density measurement in daily practice

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2004

Discordance of longitudinal changes in bone density between densitometers

Published by Sciedu Press 63 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Impact of adding distal forearm DXA to hip and spine measurements on DXA report

Maseeh uz Zaman

2016

View PDFchevron_right

Measurement of Forearm Bone Mineral Density: Comparison of Precision of Five Different Instruments

Reinhard Ziegler

Calcified Tissue International, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Impact of adding distal forearm DXA to hip and spine measurements on DXA report

Maseeh uz Zaman

Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Reproducibility of DXA: Potential Impact on Serial Measurements and Misclassification of Osteoporosis

Christopher Seaborn

Osteoporosis International, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

A Comparison of a Peripheral DXA System with Conventional Densitometry of the Spine and Femur

Rajesh Patel

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Bone mass measurement by DXA: Influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation

C. Trevisan

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Short-term Precision Error in Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry, Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Score Measurements; and Effects of Obesity on Precision Error

Karen Knapp

Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Accurate assessment of precision errors: How to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques

Barbara Blunt

Osteoporosis International, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Discordance Between Hip and Spine Bone Mineral Density Measurement Using DXA: Prevalence and Risk Factors

A. Bezza

Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by Dual X-Ray absorptiometry: Comparison of lunar and hologic instruments

John Eisman

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Discordant interpretation of serial bone mineral density measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry using vendor's and institutional least significant changes: Serious impact on decision-making

Maseeh uz Zaman

World journal of nuclear medicine

View PDFchevron_right

A New Approach for Quantifying Change and Test Precision in Bone Densitometry

Liqun Wang

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

The Utility of Portable Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry of the Wrist in Patients Referred to a Bone Health Clinic

Alan Malabanan

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Effect of Precision on Longitudinal Follow-Up of Bone Mineral Density Measurements in Elderly Women and Men

Kristina Akesson

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Long-Term Precision of DXA Scanning Assessed over Seven Years in Forty Postmenopausal Women

Rajesh Patel

Osteoporosis International, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Accuracy and Precision of 62 Bone Densitometers Using a European Spine Phantom

Christian Roux

1999

View PDFchevron_right

Universal Standardization of Forearm Bone Densitometry

Christopher Njeh

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Monitoring of Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement in Clinical Practice

Abdellah El Maghraoui

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Repeating Measurement of Bone Mineral Density when Monitoring with Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry: 2019 ISCD Official Position

Chih-hsing Wu

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2019

View PDFchevron_right

A reliable method for measuring proximal tibia and distal femur bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

Thomas Janssen

Medical Engineering & Physics, 2014

View PDFchevron_right

More bone density testing is needed, not less

Andrew Laster

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

The Precision of Digital X-Ray Radiogrammetry Compared With DXA in Subjects With Normal Bone Density or Osteoporosis

Ana Luisa

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

Bone mineral density measures in longitudinal studies: the choice of phantom is crucial for quality assessment. The Tromsø Study, a population-based study

Gro Berntsen

Osteoporosis …, 2005

View PDFchevron_right

In vivo Precision of the GE Lunar iDXA Densitometer for the Measurement of Total-Body, Lumbar Spine, and Femoral Bone Mineral Density in Adults

Karen Hind

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Best Practices for Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry Measurement and Reporting: International Society for Clinical Densitometry Guidance

Bruno Camargos

Journal of Clinical Densitometry, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Development of a clinically applicable tool for bone density assessment

Hugh Devlin

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

The Tromsø Study::: Determinants of precision in bone densitometry

Ragnar Martin Joakimsen

Journal of clinical …, 2000

View PDFchevron_right

Forearm Bone Mineral Density: A Comparison Study of Positioning and Side

Sasivimol Promma

Ramathibodi Medical Journal, 2017

View PDFchevron_right

Effects of a New Positioner on the Precision of Hip Bone Mineral Density Measurements

François Duboeuf

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Bone densitometry in the clinical practice

Carlina Albanese

European Radiology, 1997

View PDFchevron_right

Differences in precision in bone mineral density measured by SXA and DXA: the NOREPOS study (original) (raw)

Related papers