Testing the theory of successful intelligence in teaching grade 4 language arts, mathematics, and science (original) (raw)
Related papers
Assessment for Successful Intelligence: A Paradigm Shift in Classroom Practice
International Journal of Educational Research Review
Conventional educational assessments favour individuals who are strong in memory and analytical abilities. This is based on a longstanding theory of a general intelligence (g). Alternative intelligence theories have however revealed that success in life requires skills beyond memory and analytical skills. This article presents an analysis of Sternberg's theory of successful intelligence. Sternberg defines intelligence as one's ability to achieve one's goals in life, given one's social-cultural context; by capitalising on strengths and correcting or compensating for weaknesses in order to adapt, shape and select environments through a combination of analytical, creative and practical skills. This article is divided into four main parts. It starts with an introduction to the conceptual definition of intelligence. Then it discusses Sternberg's theory of successful intelligence. Next, it discusses assessment for successful intelligence in a classroom. Finally, it draws conclusions.
Intelligence and educational achievement
Intelligence, 2007
This 5-year prospective longitudinal study of 70,000+ English children examined the association between psychometric intelligence at age 11 years and educational achievement in national examinations in 25 academic subjects at age 16. The correlation between a latent intelligence trait (Spearman's g from CAT2E) and a latent trait of educational achievement (GCSE scores) was .81. General intelligence contributed to success on all 25 subjects. Variance accounted for ranged from 58.6%
Teachers’ Theories of Intelligence and Instruction in English Secondary Education
Teacher Education Advancement Network Journal, 2019
This paper explores the relationship of teachers' intelligence beliefs and classroom instruction, inparticular teachers' use of intelligence language. According to Dweck's (1999) theory of intelligence, individuals can hold intelligence beliefs on a continuum from an entity theory, where intelligence is fixed, through to an incremental theory, with intelligence understood as malleable. Some research demonstrates congruence between teachers' beliefs and practice; for example, teacher intelligence beliefs and praise language (Lin-Siegler, Dweck & Cohen, 2016). Other findings, however, report incongruence between the belief-practice relationship, such as intelligence beliefs and use of challenge (Rissanen, Kuusisto, Hanhimäki & Tirri, 2018a). Consequently, this study aims to further understand teachers' belief-practice relationship in the classroom. Pilot data were collected through mixed-methods, consisting of Dweck's (1999) intelligence theory questionnaire, video-recorded observations, and semi-structured interviews. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings indicate that the belief-practice relationship is both congruent and incongruent; as teachers' intelligence beliefs are not always enacted during instruction. Rather, intelligence belief and practice may be mediated by other personal beliefs and contextual factors, such as predetermined target grades, class sets (low, mid, high), beliefs about students and student behaviour; however additional evidence is required.
Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2024
This study explored the relationship between multiple intelligences and academic performance among Junior high school students at Al-Hamlan National High School during the Academic Year 2023-2024. Employing a descriptivecorrelational research design, respondents were selected via simple random sampling to ensure a representative sample from the entire population. Results unveiled sex as a notable predictor, with females demonstrating higher academic achievement compared to males. Furthermore, parental education levels emerged as influential factors, with children of college-educated parents exhibiting lower academic performance. However, demographic variables like age group, along with teaching styles and various types of multiple intelligences, failed to significantly predict academic outcomes. The findings underscored the necessity of integrating diverse teaching methodologies and recognizing individual cognitive strengths in educational practices. By considering the multifaceted nature of intelligence and its impact on academic success, educators could tailor their approaches to better meet the diverse needs of students, thereby fostering a more inclusive and effective learning environment.
Learning Behavior and Intelligence as Explanations for Children's Scholastic Achievement
Journal of School Psychology, 1999
This study assesses the unique and complementary ability of childhood intelligence and learning-related behavior to explain variation in achievement outcomes. Teacher-observed classroom learning behaviors and individually administered intelligence and achievement test performances were collected for a representative national sample (N ϭ 1,100) of students ages 6-17 years. The sample was blocked for age, grade level, and gender, and stratified according to the U.S. Census by race/ethnicity, parent education level, national region, community size, family structure, and educational placement. Teacher-assigned grades were collected for a secondary national sample (N ϭ 420). Hierarchical regression models revealed substantial proportions of assigned grade variance explained primarily by learning behavior and achievement test score variance explained by intelligence. Explanatory patterns remained consistent after control for demographics and alternative intellectual or behavioral variation, and the variance explained jointly by learning behavior, intelligence, and their interactions exceeded appreciably the contributions of any one source. Implications are discussed for educational assessment and intervention.
Applied Measurement in Education, 2019
This brief article introduces the topic of intelligence as highly appropriate for educational measurement professionals. It describes some of the uses of intelligence tests both historically and currently. It argues why knowledge of intelligence theory and intelligence testing is important for educational measurement professionals. The articles that follow in this special issue will provide readers with considerable information about the history of intelligence theory and testing, and especially of the Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) model of testing and its implementation. The following articles will also provide a well-reasoned approach to the way science should work in evaluating tests and the models on which they are based.