Renewed Legacy [José Clemente Orozco, José Luis Cuevas, and Notions of the Grotesque] (original) (raw)
Related papers
Without Any of the Seductions of Art: On Orozcos Misogyny and Public Art in the America
Anales del Instituto de Investigaciones Estéticas, 2012
Este ensayo examina la supuesta misoginia que se le atribuye a José Clemente Orozco en sus representaciones de mujeres al situar este tema en una de sus obras más insignes — la prostituta sonriente en el mural Catarsis, de 1934 — dentro de un contexto discursivo en el plano estético y político del modernismo internacional, de la modernidad industrial y del desarrollo urbano. Al situar la producción de este mural dentro de un momento específico en el México posrevolucionario, y tomando en cuenta el significado político de su entorno, este ensayo propone que sería más acertado comprender la imagen de Orozco como una crítica en contra de la alegoría académica en general, y de forma más puntual, como una protesta ante la renovación de la retórica civil porfiriana, que se distingue por medio de la edificación del Palacio de Bellas Artes. Al cuestionar así la iconografía de género en la obra de Orozco, propongo que somos capaces de entender mejor la forma en que la alegoría femenina, el a...
Mexican Muralism: A Critical History
Alejandro Anreus, Robin Adele Greeley, Leonard Folgarait, eds., Mexican Muralism: A Critical History (University of California Press, 2012)
In this comprehensive collection of essays, three generations of international scholars examine Mexican muralism in its broad artistic and historical contexts, from its iconic figures—Diego Rivera, José Clemente Orozco, and David Alfaro Siquieros—to their successors in Mexico, the United States, and across Latin America. These muralists conceived of their art as a political weapon in popular struggles over revolution and resistance, state modernization and civic participation, artistic freedom and cultural imperialism. The contributors to this volume show how these artists’ murals transcended borders to engage major issues raised by the many different forms of modernity that emerged throughout the Americas during the twentieth century.
Mexican Art of the 1970s: Images of Displacement
1984
The Vanderbilt Monographs on Latin American and Iberian Studies is published under the auspices of the Center for Latin American and Iberian Studies. This publication is devoted to scholarly commentary and analysis of topics comprised within the disciplines represented in the Center. Each volume is edited by a member of the Center faculty; in exceptional cases, a scholar from another institution may be invited to serve as Guest Editor. Manuscripts are selected in consultation with the Editorial Board and the General Editor. After a proposal is chosen in open competition, the Editor of the topic selected will issue a general call for papers and will send, if desirable, a limited number of invitations to scholars who are particularly well qualified to contribute within the chosen area. Each volume may vary in length, focus and context. It is expected that manuscripts submitted will be written in English; however, contributions in Portuguese or in Spanish will be accepted at the discretion of the Editor and the Editorial Board. Opinions expressed by contributors are their own, and do not necessarily represent the views of the Editorial Board or the Advisory Board of the Center for Latin American and Iberian Studies.
Revista de Estudios Hispánicos, 2019
In this article, I show how Mexican artists Edgar Clément and Tony Sandoval work through representations of mutable, gendered bodies to explore the manifestations of neoliberalism and the kinds of violence that are encouraged or facilitated within that socioeconomic framework. More specifically, I argue that both artists make use of a wide range of monsters and monstrous characters to revelatory effect as they employ a series of specifically Mexican monsters to relate multifaceted stories of violence on a personal and systemic level. This is particularly true regarding their construction and positioning of la Malinche or malinchista characters as the monstrous/revelatory centers of each text. Lastly, I argue that the use of an open medium such as comics/graphic narrative provides both artists with an ideal platform to relate issues of drug-related violence and trauma for two reasons: first, it interrogates what Oswaldo Zavala has called the critical limits of narconarrative, as both texts refuse to present drug or other violence as disconnected from the nation and the state. Secondly, this interrogative power is due in part to the way in which the Mexican reading public has historically been trained to consume and interact with graphic narrative.