CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients (original) (raw)

Spatiotemporal analysis of tumor uptake patterns in dynamic 18 FDG-PET and dynamic contrast enhanced CT

Acta Oncologica, 2011

Quantitative FDG PET Assessment for Oncology Therapy

Cancers, 2021

Dynamic PET With FDG in Patients With Unresectable Aggressive Fibromatosis Regression-Based Parametric Images and Correlation to the FDG Kinetics Based on a 2-Tissue Compartment Model

Bernd Kasper, Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss

View PDFchevron_right

The PET-derived tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor SUV as a surrogate parameter of the metabolic rate of FDG

Jens Maus, Jan Petr

View PDFchevron_right

Partial volume correction of standardized uptake values and the dual time point in FDG-PET imaging: should these be routinely employed in assessing patients with cancer?

Abass Alavi

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2007

View PDFchevron_right

Four-dimensional quantitative analysis using FDG-PET in clinical oncology

Nagara Tamaki

Japanese Journal of Radiology

View PDFchevron_right

Reproducibility and uptake time dependency of volume-based parameters on FDG-PET for lung cancer

Nagara Tamaki

BMC cancer, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Reproducibility of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Through Textural Feature Analysis in 18F-FDG PET

Laurent Corcos

Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Comparison of Tumor Volumes Derived from Glucose Metabolic Rate Maps and SUV Maps in Dynamic 18F-FDG PET

Eric Visser

Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

Parametric Imaging With Dynamic PET for Oncological Applications: Protocols, Interpretation, Current Applications and Limitations for Clinical Use

Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss

Semin Nucl Med, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Methodological considerations in quantification of oncological FDG PET studies

Eric Visser

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET imaging data in cancer imaging

Mark Muzi

2012

View PDFchevron_right

Enhanced FDG-PET tumor imaging with correlation-coefficient filtered influx-constant images

Ken Zasadny

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

View PDFchevron_right

Quantitative Assessment of Heterogeneity in Tumor Metabolism Using FDG-PET

Eric Visser

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

A new methodology to derive 3D kinetic parametric FDG PET images based on a mathematical approach integrating an error model of measurement

Sébastien Hapdey

EJNMMI Research

View PDFchevron_right

Multiparametric PET/CT in oncology

Ken Miles

Cancer Imaging, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives

Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2020

View PDFchevron_right

A Simple Evaluation of the Benefit of Combined Kinetic Analysis of Multiple Injection Dynamic PET Scans

Mark Muzi

2019

View PDFchevron_right

Dynamic (18) F-FDG PET for Assessment of Tumor Physiology in Two Breast Carcinoma Xenografts

Mona-elisabeth Revheim

Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Biologic targets identified from dynamic 18 FDG-PET and implications for image-guided therapy

Jan Rødal

Acta Oncologica, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Dynamic and Parametric Whole-Body FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology: Is it Feasible in Routine Clinical Practice?

sumati sundaraiya

Clinical Radiology & Imaging Journal, 2021

View PDFchevron_right

Standardized uptake values for [18F] FDG in normal organ tissues: Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI

Andreas Bockisch

European Journal of Radiology, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Dual time point based quantification of metabolic uptake rates in 18F-FDG PET

Jens Maus

View PDFchevron_right

18F-Alfatide II and 18F-FDG Dual-Tracer Dynamic PET for Parametric, Early Prediction of Tumor Response to Therapy

Lixin Lang

Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Shortened Acquisition Protocols for the Quantitative Assessment of the 2-Tissue-Compartment Model Using Dynamic PET/CT 18F-FDG Studies

Antonia Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss

Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2011

View PDFchevron_right

FDG-PET Determination of Metabolically Active Tumor Volume and Comparison with CT

Ken Zasadny

Clinical Positron Imaging, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

An investigation of the relation between tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) and tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) in oncological FDG PET

Klaus Zöphel

EJNMMI research, 2016

View PDFchevron_right

Kostakoglu, L. & Goldsmith, S. J. 18F-FDG PET evaluation of the response to therapy for lymphoma and for breast, lung, and colorectal carcinoma. J. Nucl. Med. 44, 224-239

Lale Kostakoglu

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

View PDFchevron_right

Repeatability of 18F-FDG uptake measurements in tumors: A metaanalysis

Harm van Tinteren

Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Quantitative PET Factors Predictive of the Response to Therapy in Solid Tumors

Patrick Colletti

Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 2013

View PDFchevron_right

Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials

Lalitha Shankar

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Impacts of time interval on 18F-FDG uptake for PET/CT in normal organs

haotian chen

Medicine, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Repeatability of Metabolically Active Volume Measurements with 18F-FDG and 18F-FLT PET in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Harm van Tinteren

Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2010

View PDFchevron_right

SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences

Sylvain Beaulieu

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Dynamic PET With FDG in Patients With Unresectable Aggressive Fibromatosis

Bernd Kasper

Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients (original) (raw)

Related papers