Biodiversity conservation and productivity in intensive agricultural systems (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Economics of Biodiversity Conservation in Agricultural Transition
2005
This paper explores the dynamic effects of biodiversity conservation on agricultural production in the context of specialised intensive farming systems that may be in transition towards more sustainable farming. The focus is on the analysis of the dynamic effects of changes in the levels of agrobiodiversity, on technical change and productivity in intensive agricultural systems. A theoretical model is used to derive hypotheses regarding these linkages that are empirically tested using a stochastic production frontier model with data from a panel of UK cereal farms for the period 1989-2000. The results suggest that the increased agrobiodiversity has positively helped to shift the production frontier outwards. This indicates that agricultural transition from more to less intensive agricultural systems can be consistent with non-decreasing output levels and an enhancement of biodiversity in agricultural landscapes.
Does Loss in Biodiversity Compromise Productivity in Intensive Agriculture?
2003
This paper explores the dynamic interrelation between biological diversity, technical change and agricultural productivity. The theoretical insights regarding these linkages are furthered by deriving the comparative dynamic solutions of an optimal control model. This provides testable hypotheses that are investigated using an output-distance parametric model to a large panel of specialised cereal farms from the UK (1989-97). The results of
Agricultural Intensification and Biodiversity Loss: Is There and Agri-EKC?
2003
This paper explores the dynamic interactions between biodiversity loss and conservation on the one hand, and agricultural development on the other. An optimal control model is used to show that the level of artificial input application to boost agricultural production and its impact on biodiversity loss could follow a reverse-EKC relationship. While increasing input use at low levels of output leads to an optimal reduction in biodiversity degradation, this reduction can also be achieved at higher levels of output by reducing input use, thus describing a U-shaped relationship between levels of agricultural input use and output, and ecological damage. The implication is that social welfare would be maximised when biodiversity conservation activities are segregated from economic activity (agriculture) in areas with high biodiversity, while these activities are integrated in areas that are poor in biodiversity JEL: Q18, Q20.
Co-viability of farmland biodiversity and agriculture
2012
Signicant declines of farmland biodiversity have been reported in Europe since several decades. Agricultural changes have been identied as a main driver of this erosion. Although dierent agri-environmental schemes have been implemented, their positive role on biodiversity remain controversial. This questions the way to reconcile farming production and biodiversity conservation in order to operationalize a sustainable and multifunctional agriculture. To deal with such issues, the present paper proposes a bio-economic model and an analysis based on a co-viability perspective. The model couples stochastic dynamics of both biodiversity and farming land-uses selected at micro level with public policies at macro level based on nancial incentives (taxes or subsidies) for landuses. The co-viability approach allows to evaluate bio-economic risks for these public incentives through the probability to satisfy a mix of biodiversity and economic constraints throughout time. The model is calibrat...
Bio economic modeling for a sustainable management of biodiversity in agricultural lands
Ecological Economics, 2011
For several decades, significant changes in farmland biodiversity have been reported in Europe. Agriculture is a major driver of these modifications. Taking into account these environmental impacts, agriculture nowadays aims at a more sustainable way of producing which would reconcile its economic and ecological functions. The objective of this paper is to give insights into the impact of public policies on both conservation of biodiversity and farming production. We develop a macro-regional model combining community dynamics of 34 bird species impacted by agricultural land-uses and an economic decision model. The ecological dynamic model is calibrated with the STOC (French Breeding Bird Survey) and AGRESTE (French land-uses) databases while the economic model relies on the gross margins of the FADN (Farm Accountancy Data Network). We investigate the scenario based on subsidies and taxes. We show that simple economic instruments could be used to establish scenarios promoting economic performances and bird populations. It is pointed out how the sustainability of the policies is sensitive to the ecological and economic indicators used by the planner. The bio-economical analysis shows several solutions for the ecology-economy trade-off. These results suggest that many possibilities are available to develop multi-functional sustainable agriculture.
A double benefit of biodiversity in agriculture
The objective of this paper is to contribute to accounting for biodiversity goals in the design of agricultural policies. A bio-economic dynamic model is developed with a multi-scale perspective. It couples biodiversity dynamics, farming land-uses selected at the micro level and public policies at the macro level based on financial incentives for land-uses. The public decision maker provides optimal incentives respecting both biodiversity and budgetary constraints. These optimal policies are then analyzed through their private, public and total costs. The model is calibrated and applied to metropolitan France at the PRA ("petite région agricole") scale using common birds as biodiversity metrics. The study first shows that the efficiency curves display decreasing concavities for different biodiversity indicators pointing out the trade-off occuring between biodiversity and economic scores. However, the total and public costs suggest that accounting for biodiversity can generate a second benefit in terms of public incomes. It is argued how a regional redistribution of this public earning to the farmers could promote the acceptability of biodiversity goals in agricultural policies.
Reconciling biodiversity conservation, food production and farmers’ demand
2018
Agricultural management should consider multiple services and stakeholders. Yet, it remains unclear how to guarantee the provision of ecosystem services that reaches stakeholders' demands, especially considering the observed biodiversity decline and the current global change predictions that may affect food security. Here, we use a model to examine how landscape compositionfraction of seminatural habitat (SNH)affects biodiversity and crop production services in intensively-managed agricultural systems. We analyse three groups of stakeholders assumed to value different ecosystem services mostindividual farmers (crop yield per area), agricultural unions (landscape production) and conservationists (biodiversity). We find that trade-offs among stakeholders' demands strongly depend on the degree of pollination dependence of crops, the strength of environmental and demographic stochasticity, and the relative amount of an ecosystem service demanded by each stakeholder, i.e. function thresholds. Intermediate amounts of SNH can allow for the delivery of relatively high levels of the three ecosystem services. Our analysis further suggests that the current levels of SNH protection lie below these intermediate amounts of SNH in intensively-managed agricultural landscapes. Given the worldwide trends in agriculture and global change, these results suggest ways of managing landscapes to reconcile the demands of several actors and ensure for biodiversity conservation and food production.
Benefits and costs of biodiversity in agricultural public policies
European Review of Agricultural Economics, 2014
This paper examines the role played by biodiversity goals in the design of agricultural policies. A bio-economic model is developed with a dynamic and multi-scale perspective. It combines biodiversity dynamics, farming land-uses selected at the micro level and public policies at the macro level based on financial incentives for land-uses. The public decision-maker identifies optimal subsidies or taxes with respect to both biodiversity and budgetary constraints. These optimal policies are then analysed through their private, public and social costs. The model is calibrated and applied to metropolitan France at the small agricultural region scale, using common birds as biodiversity metrics. First results relying on optimality curves and private costs stress the bioeconomic trade-off between biodiversity and economic scores. In contrast, the analysis of public costs suggests that accounting for biodiversity can generate a second benefit in terms of public budget. Social costs defined as the sum of private and public costs also show possible bio-economic synergies.
2009
Recent decades have witnessed substantial losses in biodiversity in Europe, partly driven by the ecological changes associated with intensification of agricultural production. These changes have particularly affected biodiversity in marginal areas, such as the uplands in UK, since habitat change has been greater than in lowland zones. Livestock farming is the main land use in these areas, and economic viability of farmers substantially relies on income coming from agricultural subsidies and agrienvironmental payments. The production decisions have an effect on biodiversity, although the precise links are subject of much debate. To assess the effects of policy changes on farm incomes and biodiversity, we developed ecological-economic models for three typical farm types in the Peak District National Park in UK. We analyse the effect of decoupling and agri-environment schemes on birds. The results