Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth (original) (raw)
Related papers
Upstream innovation protection: Common law evolution and the dynamics of wage inequality
2011
The incentives to conduct basic or applied research play a central role for economic growth, and this question has not been explored in much detail so far. How does increasing early innovation appropriability a¤ect basic research, applied research, education, and wage inequality? In the US, what does the common law system imply on the macroeconomic responses to institutional change?
The Growth Effects of National Patent Policies*
Review of international economics, 2008
We construct a two-country (innovative North and imitating South) model of product-cycle trade, fully endogenous Schumpeterian growth, and national patent policies. A move towards harmonization based on stronger Southern intellectual property rights (IPR) protection accelerates the long-run global rates of innovation and growth, reduces the North-South wage gap, and has an ambiguous effect on the rate of international technology transfer. Patent harmonization constitutes a suboptimal global-growth policy. However, if the global economy is governed by a common patent policy regime, then stronger global IPR protection: (a) increases the rates of global innovation and growth; (b) accelerates the rate of international technology transfer; and (c) has no impact on the North-South wage gap.
Innovations, patent races and endogenous growth
Journal of Economic Growth, 2011
This paper presents a model of innovations and endogenous economic growth with two main assumptions: first, the cost of searching for innovations differs across innovations, and second, innovations take time to find. The paper shows that given these two assumptions together, competition leads to patent races and to duplication of innovative activity. The paper then shows that duplication significantly reduces the effect of scale on growth. It also shows that competitive R&D creates too much research on easy innovations, and too little research on the difficult ones. Finally, the paper shows that risk sharing might increase duplication and reduce growth.
Intellectual property rights protection and endogenous economic growth
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2003
The main purpose of the paper is to examine the impact of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection on economic growth and welfare. To achieve this aim, we make use of an expanding-variety-type R&D-based endogenous growth model. We work out the transitional dynamics of a shock in IPR protection and account fully for the loss in current consumption and gain in consumption growth due to a tightening IPR protection. We ÿnd that there exists an optimal degree of IPR protection in our model. We then calibrate our model by US data, and found that under-protection of IPR is much more likely than over-protection. Moreover, in the case of over-protection, the welfare losses are trivial; whereas in the case of under-protection, the welfare losses can be substantial. ? .hk (E.L.-C. Lai).
The escape-infringement effect of blocking patents on innovation and economic growth
2010
This study develops a Schumpeterian growth model to analyze the e¤ects of di¤erent patent instruments on innovation. We …rst analyze patent breadth that captures the traditional positive e¤ect of patent rights on innovation. Then, we consider a pro…t-division rule between entrants and incumbents. Given the division of pro…t, increasing the share of pro…t assigned to incumbents reduces entrants' incentives for innovation. This aspect of blocking patents captures the recently proposed negative e¤ect of patent rights on innovation. Finally, blocking patents generate a non-monotonic e¤ect on innovation when the step size of innovation is endogenous due to a novel escape-infringement e¤ect. Calibrating the model to aggregate data, we …nd that a marginal increase in the blocking e¤ect of patent protection is likely to raise economic growth.
Patents and Economic Growth in the Long Term. A Quantitative Approach
Brussels Economic Review, 2009
The work is a quantitative analysis on the relationship between technology and economic development from data on patents from over twenty countries from the beginning of the 19th century till the end of the twentieth century. The cross section regressions between patents and per capita income show a high correlation between both variables and allow the positive effect of technological innovation on economic development to be seen. The regressions between the time series of patent applications in Spain between 1826 and 1985 and some economic variables indicate in similar fashion that there is a positive correlation between both variables, especially between patents and Gross Fixed Capital Formation.
Endogenous Recombinant Growth and Intellectual Property Rights
Macroeconomic Dynamics
We show that, even in a framework in which monopolistic exploitation of patents does not occur, patents still give rise to serious drawbacks. We rely on a recombinant growth framework that provides a stylized but clear description of the formation of knowledge externalities. In our setting a benevolent government buys immediately new patents in a competitive market and releases their contents for free. We show that inefficiencies nevertheless arise and welfare can be improved by correcting the market price through a tax–subsidy scheme. We characterize the (asymptotic) steady-state equilibrium, and some properties of the transitional path. We show that if certain conditions are met, then the economy will converge to its (asymptotic) balanced growth path, and along such a pathgrowth will be independent of the policy parameter; conversely, transition dynamics are affected by the choice of the policy parameter. We then quantitatively analyze the effect of different policy interventions ...