Gynaecologic robot-assisted cancer and endoscopic surgery (GRACES) in a tertiary referral centre (original) (raw)
Related papers
Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality?
Fertility and Sterility, 2009
To analyze the feasibility, safety, advantages, and disadvantages of using robotic technology for gynecologic surgeries in a large group of patients. Design: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). Setting: Tertiary endoscopic referral centers. Patient(s): Eighty-seven patients requiring laparoscopic treatments for benign gynecologic conditions. Intervention(s): Charts reviewed from robotic-assisted gynecologic operative laparoscopies. Main Outcome Measure(s): Length of surgery, time for robot assembly and disassembly, rate of conversion to laparotomies, and complications. Result(s): Between January 2006 and August 2007, 137 robotically assisted gynecologic procedures were performed in 87 patients. The da Vinci Surgical System was used. The average length of the surgeries was 205 minutes (60-420 ninutes). Assembly of the robot lasted 16 minutes (10-27 minutes) when disassembly took 2.5 minutes (2-6 minutes). There were no conversions to laparotomy. There were three complications. Conclusion(s): Robotic-assisted technology, in its present state, is enabling more surgeons to perform endoscopic surgery. Its advantages are 3D Vision and a faster learning curve for suturing and operating while sitting. It's an exciting enabling technology with a great future. (Fertil Steril Ò 2009;91:2620-2. Ó2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
Outcomes of Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery
Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan
Numerous studies comparing standard laparoscopic gynecological surgery (S-LGS) and robot-assisted lyparoscopic gynecological surgery (RA-LGS) have shown improved surgical accuracy, faster intracorporeal knot tying, reduced skill-based errors and shorter time required for learning. 5-8 However, there is a lack of data regarding RA surgeries from developing nations, where training is necessary to improve the frequency of use and outcomes of such technologies. Therefore, the primary aim of the present study was to compare the outcomes, particularly short-term ones, and the complications between these procedures in a tertiary care facility in Saudi Arabia.
Objective: Minimally invasive surgery has been the trend in various specialties and continues to evolve as new technology develops. The development of robotic surgery in gynecology remains in its infancy. The present study reports the first descriptive series of robotic surgery in complicated gynecologic diseases in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: From March 2009 to February 2011, the records of patients undergoing robotic surgery using the da Vinci Surgical System were reviewed for patient demographics, indications, operative time, hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy, and complications. Results: Sixty cases were reviewed in the present study. Forty-nine patients had benign gynecologic diseases, and 11 patients had malignancies. These robot-assisted laparoscopic procedures include nine hysterectomy, 15 subtotal hysterectomy, 13 myomectomy, eight staging operation, two radical hysterectomy, five ovarian cystectomy, one bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and myomectomy, two resections of deep pelvic endometriosis, one pelvic adhesiolysis, three sacrocolpopexy and one tuboplasty. Thirty-three patients had prior pelvic surgery, and one had a history of pelvic radiotherapy. Adhesiolysis was necessary in 38 patients to complete the whole operation. Robotic myomectomy was easily accomplished in patients with huge uterus or multiple myomas. The suturing of myometrium or cervical stump after ligation of the uterine arteries minimized the blood loss. In addition, it was much easier to dissect severe pelvic adhesions. The dissection of para-aortic lymph nodes can be easily accomplished. All these surgeries were performed smoothly without ureteral, bladder or bowel injury. Conclusion: The present analyses include various complicated gynecologic conditions, which make the estimation of the effectiveness of robotic surgery in each situation individually not appropriate. However, our experiences do show that robotic surgery is feasible and safe for patients with complicated gynecologic diseases.
Robotically assisted gynecologic surgery: 2-year experience in the French foch hospital
Frontiers in surgery, 2014
Robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery has seen rapid expansion over the past few years and it constantly evolves with a progressive enlargement of its range of indications. In the present paper we would like to share our 2-year experience regarding the use of robotics in various laparoscopic procedures, including hysterectomy, myomectomy, adnexal surgery, and sacrocolpopexy.
The Role of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopy in Gynecological Surgeries
Fertility and Sterility, 2005
Background: Laparoscopic surgery has revolutionized the concept of minimally invasive surgery for the last 3 decades. Robotic-assisted surgery is one of the latest innovations in the field of minimally invasive surgery. Already, many procedures have been performed in urology, cardiac surgery, and general surgery. In this article, we attempt to report our preliminary experience with roboticassisted laparoscopy in a variety of gynecological surgeries. We sought to evaluate the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgeries. Methods: The study was a case series of 15 patients who underwent various gynecologic surgeries for combined laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. The da Vinci robot was used in each case at a tertiary referral center for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. An umbilicus, suprapubic, and 2 lateral ports were inserted. These surgeries were performed both using laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques. The assembly and disassembly time to switch from laparoscopy to robotic-assisted surgery was measured. Subjective advantages and disadvantages of using robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgeries were evaluated. Results: Fifteen patients underwent a variety of gynecologic surgeries, such as myomectomies, treatment of endometriosis, total and supracervical hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, sacral colpopexy, and Moskowitz procedure. The assembly time to switch from laparoscopy to roboticassisted surgery was 18.9 minutes (range, 14 to 27), and the disassembly time was 2.1 minutes (range, 1 to 3). Robotic-assisted laparoscopy acts as a bridge between laparoscopy and laparotomy but has the disadvantage of being costly and bulky. Conclusion: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeries have advantages in providing a 3-dimensional visualization of the operative field, decreasing fatigue and tension tremor of the surgeon, and added wrist motion for improved dexterity and greater surgical precision. The disadvantages include enormous cost and added operating time for assembly and disassembly and the bulkiness of the equipment.
Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society, 2009
Advanced laparoscopic procedures for gynecologic surgery have not been widely adopted in clinical practice despite nearly 20 years of improvements in laparoscopic technology. The da Vinci robotic surgical system was cleared for use in gynecologic surgery in the U.S in 2005. Many surgeons have embraced da Vinci technology over conventional laparoscopy because of its technologic advantages of wristed instrumentation, high definition 3-D optics, ergonomics, and autonomy of camera control. Furthermore, many surgeons with limited advanced laparoscopic skills have successfully converted their practice from primarily laparotomy to minimally invasive surgery using the da Vinci System. The purpose of this article is to review the development of robotic procedures in gynecology through the current literature. This article reviews recent peer-reviewed literature concerning robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures including hysterectomy, myomectomy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic and aortic lymph...