The role of intratemporal adjustment costs in a multisector economy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Determinacy Through Intertemporal Capital Adjustment Costs
2002
It is well known that if mild sector–specific externalities are considered, then the steady state of the standard two-sector real business cycle model can become locally indeterminate and endogenous business cycles can arise. We show that this result is not robust to the introduction of standard intertemporal capital adjustment costs, which may accrue when total capital is adjusted or when each sector’s capital is adjusted. We find for both forms of adjustment costs that the steady state is determinate for all empirically plausible parameter values. We also find that determinacy occurs for a much larger range of parameter values when adjusting each sector’s capital is costly.
Aggregate investment in a business cycle model with adjustment costs
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1997
This paper explains the observed cyclical variability of aggregate investment and the counter movements with respect to its relative price in the US data using a stochastic growth model with adjustment costs. The exogenous disturbances of the model represent preference shocks, productivity innovations and changes on the relative price between consumption and investment goods. Simulations of the model imply that the volatility of those relative price innovations need to be three to four times larger than the standard Solow residual innovations in order to match the model with the data.
A two-sector model of the business cycle: a preliminary analysis
2000
In this paper a two-sector dynamic model of business fluctuations is presented. It is a disequilibrium dynamic model with two laws of evolution (dynamic laws) built into it: prices of commodities change according to the market disequilibrium of supply and demand, while quantities change according to the stock disequilibrium and the shifting of the degree of utilization of productive capacity away from its target value. Investment by firms is modelled by a nonlinear accelerator. Non linearity in the investment function makes the equilibria of the model unstable and causes growing disproportionalities between the two sectors; business fluctuations are the outcome of the switching of the system to a different regime that allows to reduce the existing disproportionality. The different regimes into which the economy may be found are a situation of overheating and one of depression. A fundamental role in the switching of the economy is played by two crucial features of the capital good se...
Intermediate inputs and sectoral comovement in the business cycle
Journal of Monetary Economics, 1997
The postwar U.S. business cycle is characterized by positive comovement of employment and output across sectors. It has been argued that multi-sector growth models are inconsistent with this observation when changes in relative productivities are the main source of uctuations. We suggest that the input-output structure of an economy, in particular the pervasive use of intermediate inputs, can induce positive comovement in sectoral employment and output following changes in relative productivities. We calibrate a model of the U.S. economy for the durable and nondurable goods producing sectors, and show that sectoral employment and output move together if intermediate inputs are used in production. The model is also consistent with the observation that the relative price of nondurable goods is procyclical.
Review of Economic Dynamics, 2006
This paper studies a multisector dynamic stochastic general equilibrium model calibrated to the 2-digit SIC level intermediate input-use and capital-use tables to investigate the importance of the intermediate input channel in explaining the sectoral employment comovement over the business cycle. In general, the business cycle comovement in employment depends on preferences as well as technology with intersectoral linkages. With indivisible labor implying that consumers do not care about the variability of leisure, the intersectoral linkages at a disaggregated level are sufficient to generate the strong business cycle comovement across sectors. With divisible labor, however, leisure-smoothing effect can dominate a sector's intersectoral linkages, implying a negative comovement. It further requires some form of worker's reluctance to substitute labor hours across sectors. Referring to some micro-level studies on the low wage elasticity of labor supply, a low substitution of labor hours is shown to generate the strong business cycle comovement in sectoral hours worked.
Investment, capacity utilization, and the real business cycle
The American Economic Review, 1988
This paper adopts Keynes' view that shocks to the marginal efficiency of investment are important for business fluctuations, but incorporates it in a neoclassical framework with endogenous capacity utilization. Increases in the efficiency of newly produced investment goods stimulate the formation of "new" capital and more intensive utilization and accelerated depreciation of "old" capital. Theoretical and quantitative analysis suggests that the shocks and transmission mechanism studied here may be important elements of business cycles. In the real-business cycle models of the type developed by Finn Kydland and Edward Prescott (1982), and John Long and Charles Plosser (1983), the cycles are generated by exogenous shocks to the production function. A stylized version of the main mechanism working in these models can be described as follows. Dynamic optimizing behavior on the part of agents in the economy implies that both consumption and investment react positively to these direct shocks to output. Since the marginal productivity of labor is directly affected, employment is also procyclical. The resulting capital accumulation provides a channel of persistence, even if the technology shocks are serially uncorrelated. Hence, these productivity shocks are able to generate, from a neoclassical framework, co-movements of macroeconomic variables and persistence of fluctuations that conform to those typically observed during business cycles. In contrast with the mechanism described above, where investment reacts to changes in output, the present paper adopts John Maynard Keynes' (1936) view that it is shocks to the marginal efficiency of investment that are important for generating output fluctuations. However, these shocks are incorporated here in a neoclassical framework where the rate of capital utilization is endogenous. In the present model, a positive shock to the marginal efficiency of investment stimulates the formation of "new" capital and the more intensive utilization and accelerated depreciation of "old" capital. The main operating characteristics of the proposed model are analyzed in order to gain an understanding of the transmission mechanism of the shocks. Of particular theoretical interest are the qualitative characteristics of the pattern of co-movements and persistence effects permissible in this framework Then, a quantitative analysis of the model is performed to assess its ability to mimic the observed pattern of postwar-U.S. business cycle fluctuations. This is carried out by constructing a parametrized version of the model for which the exact joint probability distribution of the endogenous and exogenous variables is numerically computed. Using this distribution, a set of second moments for the artificial economy's variables-reflecting their co-movements and persistence-is computed and compared with that characterizing U.S. data. Fluctuations in investment played a key role in Keynes' view of the trade cycle. There, shifts in the marginal efficiency of investment impact on investment, aggregate demand and therefore, given the disequilibrium in the labor market, employment and output. The quintessential case of this type is when there is an increase in the
Dynamic employment adjustments over business cycles
Empirical Economics, 2005
This paper uses U.S. monthly industrial production employment data between 1964 and 2000 to examine the dynamic labor adjustments of production workers and nonproduction workers in both the short and long-run. The results from the short-run analysis show that the dynamic adjustment of production workers is consistent with business cycles. However, the adjustment of nonproduction workers is relatively fixed, lags behind the shocks over business cycle changes, and exhibits the quasi-fixed factor property. In the long-run, we found that nonproduction workers and production workers are cointegrated indicating that the two series are in long-run equilibrium. JEL Classification Codes: C320, J210, J500.
International transmission of the business cycle in a multi-sector model
European Economic Review, 2002
Standard multi-country models do not replicate important features of the international transmission of business cycles, predicting cross-country correlations of output and consumption which are, respectively, too low and too high. In this paper we modify the supply side of a two-country model by adding multiple sectors and trade in intermediate goods. The model generates a higher cross-country correlation of output than standard one-sector models. It also predicts cross-country correlations of employment and investment that are closer to the data. We analyze the relative impact of multiple sectors, trade in intermediate goods, imperfect substitution between domestic and foreign goods, home preference, capital adjustment costs, and capital depreciation in order to pinpoint the features which move the model's predictions closer to the data. : S 0 0 1 4 -2 9 2 1 ( 0 1 ) 0 0 0 9 8 -8
Evolution of Modern Business Cycle Models: Accounting for the Great Recession
Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2018
Modern business cycle theory focuses on the study of dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) models that generate aggregate fluctuations similar to those experienced by actual economies. We discuss how these modern business cycle models have evolved across three generations, from their roots in the early real business cycle models of the late 1970s through the turmoil of the Great Recession four decades later. The first generation models were real (that is, without a monetary sector) business cycle models that primarily explored whether a small number of shocks, often one or two, could generate fluctuations similar to those observed in aggregate variables such as output, consumption, investment, and hours. These basic models disciplined their key parameters with micro evidence and were remarkably successful in matching these aggregate variables. A second generation of these models incorporated frictions such as sticky prices and wages; these models were primarily developed to ...
Endogenous business cycles and the economic response to exogenous shocks
2007
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the macroeconomic response to exogenous shocks, namely natural disasters and stochastic productivity shocks. To do so, we make use of an endogenous business cycle model in which cyclical behavior arises from the investment-profit instability; the amplitude of this instability is constrained by the increase in labor costs and the inertia of production capacity and thus results in a finite-amplitude business cycle.