THE SECRET OF RENDERING SIGNS EFFECTIVE: THE IMPORT OF C. S. PEIRCE'S SEMIOTIC RHETORIC (original) (raw)
Related papers
Influence of Peirce’s Semiotics on the Signification of Literary Discourse
Linguistics and Literature Studies, 2015
Semiotics principally investigates and explores the production and function of signs and sign systems as well as the methods of their signification. It is mainly concerned with how a sign signifies and what precedes it at deeper level to result in the manifestation of its meaning. For this purpose, it offers a set of unified principles that underlie the construction, signification and communication of any sign system. The literary text as a sign system serves as an artfully constructed fictional discourse that can be signified as the same way of the signification of other sign systems. This article explains the effects of Charles Sanders Peirce's theory of signs on the development of a clear methodological principle for the narrative studies, particularly for the signification of literary discourse. So it tries to give a new direction to the signification of literary discourse on the basis of the Peirce's theory of signs and cognitive theories. It mainly provides a semiotic method for the signification of literary discourse.
Struggle of a description: Peirce and his late semiotics
The paper deals with the problem of Peirce’s theory of signs, placing it within the context of modern semiotics (comparing it with Saussurean semiology, in particular), and considers Peirce’s semiotics from the point of view of his theory of categories (phaneroscopy) and in the terms of his classification of signs. The article emphasizes the complicated system of Peirce’s late, “mature”, semeiotic and his theory (classification) of Interpretant.
The Two-Way Interpretation Process in Peirce's Late Semiotics: A Priori and a Posteriori
On his own admission Peirce's priority in his work in semiotics concerned the identification of all possible signs, and it is clearly for this reason that of the two typologies announced in the letter to Lady Welby of 23 December 1908—one yielding twenty-eight classes and the other sixty-six— it was the latter that he found the more interesting, to the complete neglect of the former. And yet contributing to the originality of this particular typology is the fact that after 1906 Peirce appears no longer to employ his phaneroscopic categories as the criteria for establishing the various subdivisions in his classifications, preferring instead three modally organized universes, and, in the period from 1907 on, a growing appeal to the requirement of collateral observation of the object in definitions of the sign—both these factors being associated with a greater understanding of the nature of the dynamic object, particularly in the period 1908-1909. The paper thus seeks to demonstrate the potential for semiotic analysis of Peirce's neglected 28-class classification system by showing its originality within the fifteen or more typologies he developed between 1866 and 1908. This, it is to be hoped, will compensate for Peirce's neglect by showing how an examination of the evolving typologies sheds light on the development of his conception of signs and on the shift in the theoretical framework which underwrote it.
Understanding Rhetoric with Peircean Semiotic Concepts (Atena Editora)
Understanding Rhetoric with Peircean Semiotic Concepts (Atena Editora), 2024
This article starts from a conception of rhetoric as a process of “identification” and not the way in which it is traditionally defined, giving relevance to “persuasion”, taking into consideration, the semiotic studies of Charles Sanders Peirce. The text presents historical references and characteristics that give relevance to the science of rhetoric, which has existed since Greek antiquity, as a way of combating violence through the argumentation of ideas. It brings some contributions from Peirce with his semiotics and pragmatist philosophy, presenting the paths linked to “speculative grammar”, through which semiotic concepts contribute to the reflection of “common rhetoric”, as is the case of communicative texts.
Discursive Habits: Peirce and Cognitive Semiotics (March 2021)
2021
Talk delivered to the International Centre for Enactivism and Cognitive Semiotics, March 2021, organised and hosted by Claudio Paolucci (Bologna). ABSTRACT: Enactivism has greatly benefitted contemporary philosophy by demonstrating that the traditional intellectualist ‘act-content’ model of intentionality is simply insufficient, and showing how minds may be built from world-involving bodily habits. Many enactivists have assumed that this must entail non-representationalism concerning at least basic minds. Here I argue that such anti-intellectualism is overly constraining, and not necessary. I sketch an alternative enactivism which draws on Peirce’s pragmatic semiotics, and understands signs as habits whose connections with rich schemas of possible experience render them subject to increasing degrees of self-control. The talk’s key innovation is to align this cyclical process of habit cultivation with Peirce’s representationalist icon-index-symbol distinction, in a manner which I explain. The presentation is also viewable on YouTube: https://youtu.be/jrW4AsV5kCQ
The Semiotic Perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A Brief Comparative Study
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014
The primary purpose of this paper is to make a comparative analysis between two leading scholars' perspectives on semiotic theory, namely Charles Sanders Peirce and Ferdinand de Saussure. In addition, it is also aimed at discussing the linkage between communication and semiotic which can be grasped as a signification of symbol or simply as a study of sign in societal life. Apart from the communication field itself, the theory is commonly used as a reference in various fields such as philosophy, linguistic, arts and literature, archeology, architecture, mathematics and so on. The data has been attained by using content analysis technique of various studies on semiotic and related subject. This article is expected to generate positive contribution in underlining the significance of semiotic theory, not only towards the enhancement of the semiotic epistemology but also to other researchers and academicians in related fields or specific areas.
Peirce's semiotics and the russian formalism: points of convergence
Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of the International Association For Semiotic Studies Recurso Electronico Culture of Communication Communication of Culture Culture De La Communication Communication De La Culture Cultura De La Comunicacion Comunicacion De La Cultura 2012 Isbn 978 84 9749 522 6, 2012
it is a prevailing opinion nowadays that saussurean semiology and Peircean theory of signs are two major semiotic schools which, although they have certain theoretical and historical background in common, are utterly incommensurable. However, it appears that the opposing extremes of saussure's semiology and Peirce's semiotics seem to be reconcilable in the light of the Russian formalism-essentially a saussurean-type semiotic school, which gained wide acclaim in the mid-20th century europe, alongside the French structuralism. in his late paper «oedipus in the light of folklore» Vladimir Propp, one of the formalists, explores the problem of narrative continuity in different folklore traditions. Taking the story of Oedipus Rex as an example, he describes a set of «motives» shaping the story as specific iconic units of discourse by means of which certain forms of narrative are transmitted from one historical period to another. His analysis reveals some striking similarities with Peirce's early ideas on the nature of signs and representation, and in particular those Peirce puts forward in his «on a new list of categories». This paper undertakes to reinterpret some of the late formalist ideas on continuity in terms of Peirce's semiotics. The brief account it presents has a double aim: (1) to show the possibility of building a case where Peirce's basic semiotic ideas might actually be applied as efficient tools in analysis of different traditional discourses, and (2) to enable us to put some basic formalist analytical categories in the wider context of Peirce's semiotics, making purely structural aspect of meaning a particular case of Peirce's theory of signs.
Semiotica, 1990
In this paper I will deal with some basic conceptions of semioticsmainly with the nature, the structure, and the evolution of Semiosis. Thus the nature of Sign and its function in the structure of the Semiotic process is the hero of this story. In the framework of this paper I will discuss semiotics in its widest sense: namely, not only as a theory of signs and philosophy of language, but also as a philosophy of cognition and mind. This extension of the conception of Semiosis comes, upon my interpretation, as a natural conclusion of the reconstruction of Peirce's pragmaticist philosophy. There is a strong inclination among some semioticians, philosophers, psychologists, biologists, and others (including physicists) to understand every natural phenomenon, either physical or psychical, as a Sign process, and therefore as a Semiosis. In doing so they seem to be identifying the structures of the physical processes they study with the structure of their own cognition, in which they interpret in Signs those former processes. Such enterprises follow the path of cybernetics, information theory, and computer science in understanding physical processes in terms of 'sign',