“America Has Escaped from our Hands": Rethinking Empire, Identity and Independence during the Trienio Liberal in Spain, 1820-1823 (original) (raw)
2011, European History Quarterly
Spanish nationalists lauded the Constitution of 1812, which erased the boundaries of colony and metropole. By the early 1820s, however, separatists narrated 300 years of American history as a Biblical tale of enslavement, with nations ultimately freed from captivity by the heroism and martyrdom of liberators such as Hidalgo. Contrary to the idea that an apathetic metropolis turned away from its empire, this article recovers a vibrant public sphere in which debates raged over independence, nationality and the possibilities of constitutional monarchy. As Spain and Mexico shared a liberal political culture, it is clear that national identities diverged only inasmuch as nationalists insisted upon distinctive cultural and historical roots and the definitive separation of the ‘two Spains’.
Sign up to get access to over 50M papers
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Related papers
2021
This paper analyzes the discourses and strategies of the counter-revolution in New Spain/Mexico between 1810 and 1823. I study the ideological evolution operated by the anti-liberals, from the rejection of the first proposals for independence until their acceptance. This change has not had a completely satisfactory explanation for historiography. My interpretative proposal supports the need of inserting that problem within a broader dynamic that encompasses the Euro-American space and its experiences. In this work I develop the concept of Atlantic Counter-Revolutionary Identity. It refers to the diffusion and exchange of ideas, books, doctrines, and imaginaries between both sides of the ocean. From the intellectual field, the articulation of an early sort of International of the Anti-Liberalism contributed to the symbolic union of opponents of the Revolution. The anti-enlightened and reactionary theories of the European authors were adapted to the historical circumstances of the Americas, becoming part of a new interpretative tradition that was constantly renewed.
The Conceptual History of Independence and the Colonial Question in Spanish America
The idea that Spanish American countries experienced and were burdened by the legacy of Spanish colonialism was well accepted for most of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The movements for political independence at the beginning of the nineteenth century were viewed as the result of social and economic pressures and the struggle of oppressed nations against the tyranny of the metropolis. However, over the last two decades we have witnessed a “Copernican revolution.”1 Much of the recent historiography views the collapse of the Hispanic order as the result of the political and legal crisis brought about by the Napoleonic invasion and the illegal abdications in Bayonne in March 1808. As a consequence, if colonial and post-colonial theories and categories were previously accepted by historians of all stripes, now they have been brought under scrutiny and many scholars challenge their analytical pertinence. The following pages deploy a conceptual approach in order to sketch the historiographical and theoretical grounds and consequences of this paradigm shift.
Forging Catholic National Identities in the Transatlantic Spanish Monarchy, 1808-1814
Institute of European Studies, 2008
At the beginning of the nineteenth century, the political boundaries of colonial viceroyalties had yet to be demarcated into national borders, and no nations can be said to have existed in Spanish America. Patriots in Spain and New Spain drew upon a common template as they articulated identities grounded in both secular and spiritual discourses, Catholicism and the legitimating rhetoric of monarchical rule. By 1810, however, with the convening of the Cortes of Cádiz, the opening of the public sphere and war threatening to tear apart the monarchy, Spaniards began to forge a new national identity and an inclusive transatlantic nation.. National histories, reified upon achieving independence, have often been studied apart from one another. Within an American context, Mexican nationalism has been analyzed as a natural outcome of the independence struggle that culminated in 1821, just as the other nationalist traditions borne out of colonial Spanish America have laid claims to a singular and unique past that justified independence and political sovereignty. Such teleological narratives, however, have served to obscure central features of the struggles against Spain. For example, Jaime Rodríguez has forcefully argued that early political leaders throughout the empire espoused autonomy within a composite Spanish monarchy rather than outright independence. 1 Thus, that the priest Hidalgo rebelled in the name of Fernando VII and under the banner of the Catholic church did not seem contradictory to his followers at the time. Yet few works have studied the concurrent development of Spanish nationalist discourses as well as those of American, Mexican and other emerging
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.