The economic contribution of labour migrants in the European maritime labour market of the long eighteenth century (original) (raw)
Related papers
Some considerations about the link between economic development and migration
More than forty years after the publication of Zelinsky's article in the Geographical Review, the hypothesis of the mobility transition is still very much alive. 1 As it is frequently cited in migration related publications and is still an important part of the curriculum in geography departments all over the world, it is likely that the theory will be around for a while. Perhaps the greatest appeal of Zelinsky's theory of the mobility transition in past and present lies in the fact that it seems to fit well with an image of the nineteenth century that is still predominant: a century of rapid and large social and economic change. Many of these ideas stem from the work of Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, but later scholars have also supported this notion, explicitly or implicitly. The idea of an economic take-off, as proposed in Walt Rostow seminal book, was adopted by many others after him, for instance in the important work of Dean and Cole. 2 In this particular view or paradigm, industrialization could be regarded as a 'dramatic culmination to a long-gathering process of change, rather as the cylinder may be charged with a head of steam quite quickly but only if the water has long been heating'. 3 The notion of a sudden societal transformation supports the still prevalent idea of the nineteenth century as a hinge point in social and economic change, and so indeed does Zelinsky's theory to a great extent.
This paper offers the first multivariate regression study of international migration in early modern Europe. Using unique eighteenth-century data about maritime workers, we created a data set of migration flows among European countries to examine the role of factors related to geography, population, language, the market and chain migration in explaining the migration of these workers across countries. We show that among all factors considered in our multivariate analysis, the geographical characteristics of the destination countries, size of port towns, and chain migration are among the most robust and quantitatively the most important factors influencing cross-country migration flows.
2020
Economic reasons are among the basic explanatory factors of migration, whether international or internally within a country. In turn, migratory movements have effects on the economy in terms of economic growth in general, but also in the different markets (work, housing, consumer goods, etc.) and public services (education, health, social services, etc.). The purpose of this document is to offer an overview of these interactions between migration and the economy in the case of the Canary Islands. To do this, certain conceptual clarifications will be made initially involving the mutual determination of both processes, before later providing specifics with evidence on the Canarian case for the main issues considered: the economic reasons for migration, and its impact on economic growth, the labour market and the living conditions of the immigrant population. The final section alludes to the importance of the institutional framework that regulates these relations between migration and ...
The economic role of migrants in the production of tradeables and nontradeables: the case of Austria
2003
Globalisation has been associated with increased international mobility of capital but, partly due to legal restrictions, it is not often associated with labour mobility. However, free labour mobility and free trade are substitutes in respect of tradeable goods and services. The Austrian migration system channels migrants into industries which produce tradeables, e.g. manufacturing with a low capital to labour ratio, in particular, labour intensive industries like clothing, leather and textiles; and also into activities which are non-tradeables, e.g. tourism, construction and personal, health and domestic services. In the course of the 1990s, the rise in labour mobility lagged as industries employing a high proportion of migrants in the production of tradeable goods declined behind the growth in international trade of goods and services. Technological developments, the reduction in transport costs as well as improved processes for the production capacities of less developed trading partners resulted in a shift in the production of tradeable goods. The structure of migrant labour changed as a consequence and labour mobility lost momentum. Physical labour mobility is necessary only where services are linked directly to the consumers, for example, nursing or tourism industry, or where a particular type of labour is linked to direct capital investment, for example, highly skilled labour which move with multinational companies. Recent developments especially in communications technology, tend to promote mobility of services without the need for labour mobility. As long as capital, technology and managerial skills are mobile, labour may remain in the country of origin, e.g. in the case of Indian computer programmers. Both labour mobility and trade in goods and services will tend to produce a convergence in the pay rates of the countries concerned. (Heckscher-Ohlin) Therefore, forces which promote international movement of goods and services, may be expected to produce a tendency for convergence of pay rates even without a movement of labour. BIFFL, Gudrun Globalisation, trade and migration: an introductory note Globalisation has been associated with increased international mobility of capital but less so of labour (Solimano, 2001). This may be the result of a general notion that commodity trade is in the main a winwin situation, and migration as giving rise to increased inequalities, of producing winners and losers. This view is promoted by the fact that countries tend to impose restrictions on labour mobility while at the same time removing barriers to the free flow of goods and services across borders (GATS) thus discriminating against labour mobility in favour of international trade. This may be a contributory factor to the rising number of illegal migrants who endeavour to improve their economic situation by migrating even if it means working in the informal sector (Ghosh, 1998/99). The existence of informal sector production of goods and services and the creation of jobs and incomes in the non-observed economy, both in developing and developed countries (OECD, 2002, ILO, 2002) 1 , may thus promote illegal migration. The practice for official statistics to include only flows of goods, services and workers in the formal sector, gives international trade a higher weight than warranted. (Biffl, 1999A, 2002) Nonetheless, the general picture is reasonably accurate. This raises the question whether the policy assumption that trade and migration have different impacts on economic growth, the labour market, prices and income distribution is valid, despite the theoretical proposition that they are in the main substitutes and thus can be expected to have similar impacts. If the latter is true, the encouragement of a freer movement of labour for humanitarian and social reasons-illegal migrants are not subject to the legal and social protection of regular migrants-can be justified on economic grounds. Another question to be followed up is the impact on the composition and growth rate of international trade and labour migration, of the transfer of different parts of the production and distribution process