Analysis ofMlc-lacZ Met mutants highlights the essential function of Met for migratory precursors of hypaxial muscles and reveals a role for Met in the development of hyoid arch-derived facial muscles (original) (raw)
Related papers
The role of SF/HGF and c-Met in the development of skeletal muscle
Development, 1999
Hypaxial skeletal muscles develop from migratory and non-migratory precursor cells that are generated by the lateral lip of the dermomyotome. Previous work shows that the formation of migratory precursors requires the c-Met and SF/HGF genes. We show here that in mice lacking c-Met or SF/HGF, the initial development of the dermomyotome proceeds appropriately and growth and survival of cells in the dermomyotome are not affected. Migratory precursors are also correctly specified, as monitored by the expression of Lbx1. However, these cells remain aggregated and fail to take up long range migration. We conclude that parallel but independent cues converge on the migratory hypaxial precursors in the dermomyotomal lip after they are laid down: a signal given by SF/HGF that controls the emigration of the precursors, and an as yet unidentified signal that controls Lbx1. SF/HGF and c-Met act in a paracrine manner to control emigration, and migratory cells only dissociate from somites located ...
Intrinsic, Hox-Dependent Cues Determine the Fate of Skeletal Muscle Precursors
Developmental Cell, 2003
wall muscle precursors develop by two distinct mechanisms (reviewed by Dietrich, 1999). Body wall muscle 1 Department of Craniofacial Development Floor 27 Guy's Tower precursors are deposited into the embryonic myotome as postmitotic cells, which readily differentiate and form King's College London Guy's Hospital myotubes. As more cells are added by the mitotically active dermomyotome, coordinate myotomal and der-London SE1 9RT 2 MRC Centre for Developmental Neurobiology momyotomal outgrowth is achieved. Limb muscle precursors, by contrast, detach from the lateral dermomyo-Floor 4 New Hunt's House King's College London tomal lips and, rather than integrating into the myotome, undergo long-range migration. Upon arrival at the target London SE1 1UL United Kingdom site, they proliferate extensively, then withdraw from cell cycle and differentiate. This implies that the question initially addressed by the earlier embryological studies was essentially the question of migratory muscle precur-Summary sor (MMP) formation versus the formation of nonmigratory, myotomal cells.
In vertebrates, head and trunk muscles develop from different mesodermal populations and are regulated by distinct genetic networks. Neck muscles at the head-trunk interface remain poorly defined due to their complex morphogenesis and dual mesodermal origins. Here, we use genetically modified mice to establish a 3D model that integrates regulatory genes, cell populations and morphogenetic events that define this transition zone. We show that the evolutionary conserved cucullaris-derived muscles originate from posterior cardiopharyngeal mesoderm, not lateral plate mesoderm, and we define new boundaries for neural crest and mesodermal contributions to neck connective tissue. Furthermore, lineage studies and functional analysis of Tbx1-and Pax3-null mice reveal a unique developmental program for somitic neck muscles that is distinct from that of somitic trunk muscles. Our findings unveil the embryological and developmental requirements underlying tetrapod neck myogenesis and provide a blueprint to investigate how muscle subsets are selectively affected in some human myopathies.
Muscle development: Forming the head and trunk muscles
Acta Histochemica, 2008
The morphological events forming the body's musculature are sensitive to genetic and environmental perturbations with high incidence of congenital myopathies, muscular dystrophies and degenerations. Pattern formation generates branching series of states in the genetic regulatory network. Different states of the network specify pre-myogenic progenitor cells in the head and trunk. These progenitors reveal their myogenic nature by the subsequent onset of expression of the master switch gene MyoD and/or Myf5. Once initiated, the myogenic progression that ultimately forms mature muscle appears to be quite similar in head and trunk skeletal muscle. Several genes that are essential in specifying pre-myogenic progenitors in the trunk are known. Pax3, Lbx1, and a number of other homeobox transcription factors are essential in specifying pre-myogenic progenitors in the dermomyotome, from which the epaxial and hypaxial myoblasts, which express myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs), emerge. The proteins involved in specifying premyogenic progenitors in the head are just beginning to be discovered and appear to be distinct from those in the trunk. The homeobox gene Pitx2, the T-box gene Tbx1, and the bHLH genes Tcf21 and Msc encode transcription factors that play roles in specifying progenitor cells that will give rise to branchiomeric muscles of the head. Pitx2 is expressed well before the onset of myogenic progression in the first branchial arch (BA) mesodermal core and is essential for the formation of first BA derived muscle groups. Anterior-posterior patterning events that occur during gastrulation appear to initiate the Pitx2 expression domain in the cephalic and BA mesoderm. Pitx2 therefore contributes to the establishment of network states, or kernels, that specify pre-myogenic progenitors for extraocular and mastication muscles. A detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that regulate head muscle specification and formation provides the foundation for understanding congenital ARTICLE IN PRESS www.elsevier.de/acthis (C. Kioussi). myopathies. Current technology and mouse model systems help to elucidate the molecular basis on etiology and repair of muscular degenerative diseases.
Developmental Biology, 1998
Activated by dorsalizing and lateralizing signals, the Pax3 gene is an early marker for the entire paraxial mesoderm and its dorsal derivative, the dermomyotome. Later, its expression becomes restricted to the lateral dermomyotome and to the migratory muscle precursors giving rise to the hypaxial musculature. To understand better the role that Pax3 plays during development of paraxial mesoderm-derived structures, we followed the development of the musculature and skeleton in the murine Pax3 mutant Splotch. We found that the mutant dermomyotomes and myotomes failed to organize and to elongate medially and laterally, leading to the reduction and malformation of the entire trunk musculature. Mutants lacked ventral aspects of the body wall musculature and muscles derived from migratory myoblasts, suggesting a crucial function for Pax3 in the long-range migration of muscle precursors giving rise to the ventral hypaxial musculature. In addition, severe malformations were detected in the skeleton. The axial and appendicular skeleton displayed malformations and in particular multiple bone fusions.
Distinct Regulatory Cascades Govern Extraocular and Pharyngeal Arch Muscle Progenitor Cell Fates
Developmental Cell, 2009
Genetic regulatory networks governing skeletal myogenesis in the body are well understood, yet their hierarchical relationships in the head remain unresolved. We show that either Myf5 or Mrf4 is necessary for initiating extraocular myogenesis. Whereas Mrf4 is dispensable for pharyngeal muscle progenitor fate, Tbx1 and Myf5 act synergistically for governing myogenesis in this location. As in the body, Myod acts epistatically to the initiating cascades in the head. Thus, complementary pathways, governed by Pax3 for body, and Tbx1 for pharyngeal muscles, but absent for extraocular muscles, activate the core myogenic network. These diverse muscle progenitors maintain their respective embryonic regulatory signatures in the adult. However, these signatures are not sufficient to ensure the specific muscle phenotypes, since the expected differentiated phenotype is not manifested when satellite cells are engrafted heterotopically. These findings identify novel genetic networks that may provide insights into myopathies which often affect only subsets of muscles.
The CXCR4/SDF-1 Axis in the Development of Facial Expression and Non-somitic Neck Muscles
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020
Trunk and head muscles originate from distinct embryonic regions: while the trunk muscles derive from the paraxial mesoderm that becomes segmented into somites, the majority of head muscles develops from the unsegmented cranial paraxial mesoderm. Differences in the molecular control of trunk versus head and neck muscles have been discovered about 25 years ago; interestingly, differences in satellite cell subpopulations were also described more recently. Specifically, the satellite cells of the facial expression muscles share properties with heart muscle. In adult vertebrates, neck muscles span the transition zone between head and trunk. Mastication and facial expression muscles derive from the mesodermal progenitor cells that are located in the first and second branchial arches, respectively. The cucullaris muscle (non-somitic neck muscle) originates from the posterior-most branchial arches. Like other subclasses within the chemokines and chemokine receptors, CXCR4 and SDF-1 play essential roles in the migration of cells within a number of various tissues during development. CXCR4 as receptor together with its ligand SDF-1 have mainly been described to regulate the migration of the trunk muscle progenitor cells. This review first underlines our recent understanding of the development of the facial expression (second arch-derived) muscles, focusing on new insights into the migration event and how this embryonic process is different from the development of mastication (first arch-derived) muscles. Other muscles associated with the head, such as non-somitic neck muscles derived from muscle progenitor cells located in the posterior branchial arches, are also in the focus of this review. Implications on human muscle dystrophies affecting the muscles of face and neck are also discussed.