The accelerating Integration of Banks and Markets and its Implications for Regulation (original) (raw)
Related papers
Banks working for themselves: financial intermediation and the banking crisis of 2007
rij.eng.uerj.br
The role of banks in the economy is justified in the mainstream economics and finance literature by their ability to reduce informational asymmetries and to innovate risk transformation instruments. The political economy literature on governance, on the other hand, sees an important institutional role for banks in disciplining firm managers and facilitate financing of long-term productive activities of firms. The current banking crisis, however, has raised serious questions about such efficiency-based arguments and has undermined the arguments about financial innovation as market-based mechanism to support productive activities. The literatures on financial intermediation and corporate governance focuse on the efficiency of financial institutions and markets but ignores the historical transformation in banking since the early 1980s during which the Western economies have become financialized. In the first section this paper will provide a comprehensive critical review of the mainstream banking literatures. The second section will argue, through a set of empirics, how banks have reinvented themselves in a financialized economy by radically changing their balance sheet structure and revenue sources. The third section will conclude.
Brazilian Keynesian Review
Based on the Post-Keynesian approach, we argue that commercial banks, through the financial reforms of 1980 and 1999, which made financial institutions more flexible, increased their capacity to operate in the capital market by becoming Banking Financial Holding Companies. The 2007/2008 crisis is understood as a consequence of financial deregulation and financial innovation process that weakened the Federal Reserve's capacity to restrain banking activity. Initially, we discuss the new institutional context that emerged from these changes in the financial regulatory framework between 1980 and 1999. Then, we focus on how financial deregulation allowed banking business to advance in financial markets, how this process contributed to the economic crisis of 2007, characterized both as a liquidity crisis and a solvency crisis, safeguarded by the National States. Finally, we analyze the Dodd-Frank Law (2010), which is interpreted as the reaffirmation of this endogenous process of finan...
Regulation of Banking and Financial Markets
Social Science Research Network, 2011
The dynamic evolution of the financial system is stirring up the regulatory debate. Recent theoretical insights in the role of financial intermediaries and banks shed new light on the role of financial regulation. Information asymmetries, adverse selection and moral hazard problems help to explain the need for investors' protection and the occurrence of systemic crises that may endanger financial stability. Lender of last resort interventions and deposit insurance are to be complemented by incentive compatible capital adequacy rules in an efficient corporate governance perspective. The balance between market and government is shifting, replacing structural by prudential measures, eventually moving towards worldwide regulation.
Market Forces at Work in the Banking Industry: Evidence from the Capital Buildup of the 1990s
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
We document the build-up of regulatory and market equity capital in large U.S. bank holding companies between 1986 and 2000. During this time, large banking firms raised their capital ratios to the highest levels in more than 50 years. Since 1995, essentially none of the 100 largest U.S. banking firms have been constrained by de jure regulatory capital standards. Nor do these firms appear to be protecting themselves explicitly against falling below supervisory minimum capital standards. Variation in bank equity ratios reliably reflects portfolio risk, and we attribute the capital increase to enhanced market incentives to monitor and price large banks' default risks.
Post-crisis regulatory reform in banking: Address insolvency risk, not illiquidity!
Journal of Financial Stability, 2018
An extensive review of the evidence related to the 2007-09 crisis reveals that it was an insolvency risk crisis, not a liquidity crisis. The appropriate post-crisis regulatory reform should therefore focus on increasing capital requirements. The Basel III liquidity requirements do not serve a useful economic purpose in dealing with the root causes of the stresses that led to the 2007-09 crisis, and unnecessarily constrain the asset transformation and liquidity creation roles of banks to the detriment of economic growth.
Essays on financial fragility and regulation
2013
This thesis investigates various issues in regulation, with three chapters on financial fragility and banking regulation, and one chapter on competition policy. Chapter 2 studies banks’ herding driven by their need for market liquidity, highlighting a trade-off between systemic risk and liquidity creation. The model also suggests that systemic risk and leverage are mutually reinforcing, offering an explanation of why banks collectively exposed themselves to mortgage-backed securities prior to the crisis, and why the exposure grew when banks were increasingly leveraged using wholesale short-term funding. Chapter 3 examines the possible trade-off between banking competition and financial stability by highlighting banks' endogenous leverage. Competition is shown to affect portfolio risk, insolvency risk, liquidity risk and systemic risk differently. The model leads us to revisit the existing empirical literature using a more precise taxonomy of risk and take into account endogenous...
Bank Regulation and Market Structure
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2016
Following the recent and ongoing tightenings of capital requirements in response to the financial crisis many experts have predicted a decline in the importance of the banking sector as banks struggle to compete with other providers of financial intermediation. The purpose of our research is to investigate this hypothesis in a model where the need for bank regulation is explained from first principles. Our analysis suggests that, in a monopolistic competition setting, with higher capital requirements the bank sector may see bank competition reduced as the sector becomes dominated by fewer banks. Parallel with this development depositors may stop using banks in favor of an outside option that can be interpreted as banks which are either unregulated or subject to other, possibly less stringent, types of regulation. It is noteworthy that the first effect goes against an objective often stated by regulators, namely to reduce the number of large banks in the market, banks which may be "too big to fail". We explain tightened capital requirements as the regulator's response to financial innovation. In our model such innovation increases the riskiness of certain asset classes without improving on their expected return. The only way to prevent banks from using these new assets is by increasing the capital requirements for all asset classes. The costs of these requirements are ultimately born by depositors and may lead them to look for better returns elsewehere. Our model builds on the Salop (1979) model and in doing so also sheds some light on its properties. In particular we show that so-called monopoly equilibria only exist when the number of banks is constrained to be an integer.
Financial regulations and bank credit to the real economy
Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2015
We present a new agent-based model focusing on the linkage between the interbank market and the real economy with a stylised central bank acting as lender of last resort. Using this model we address the tradeoff between stability and economic performance for different structures of the interbank market. We also explore the efficacy of recent regulatory reforms using our richer model. Our results suggest that the effects of regulatory leverage ratios on the banking sector's performance can vary in a complex and nonmonotonic way with the state of the economy, the degree of connectivity of the interbank market and the amount of information available to market participants on bank risks.
Bank Regulation in the United States
CESifo Economic Studies, 2010
There have been major changes in the banking system structure and several new banking laws over time that have had major impact on banks in the USA. In response to the 1980s and early 1990s crisis, and the more recent mortgage market meltdown that began in the summer of 2007, the banking industry and regulations governing banks changed profoundly and rapidly with even more changes likely to take place. It is therefore important to delineate the nature of these changes, particularly in comparison to the pre-crisis character of the US banking system and regulatory environment. In particular, this article discusses the regulatory changes that have emerged in response to the decline in the role of banks in firms' external financing, and the rise in noninterest-generating activities; the blurring of distinctions between banks and other depository institutions, and between banking companies and other financial intermediaries; the growing complexity of banking organizations, both in a corporate hierarchy sense, and with respect to the range of activities in which they can engage; the more intense globalization of banking; and the subprime mortgage market meltdown that triggered a credit crunch and liquidity freeze that led to the worst recession in the USA since the Great Depression. (JEL codes: G21, G28 and G01)