Strategies, Performances and Profiling of a Sample of U.S. Universities in 2012 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Economics and Marketing of USA Universities
Procedia Economics and Finance, 2014
The global economic crisis is affecting not-for-profit performances: endowments are suffering, revenues and contributions are diminishing. At the same time donors are targeted by a pressing good-cause related marketing and the competition for resources is particularly keen. Not-for-profits like USA Universities are then confronted with different marketing tools: some of them are typical of forprofits and concern customers, their segmentation and their purchasing-power exploitation; some are, instead, typical of not-for-profits and aim to gain propensity and trustworthiness of donors. The economic and marketing literature counts several contributions about the implementation of marketing, fundraising, investing and other miscellaneous strategies whose final aim is the revenue maximization. From draft application to mature strategies, marketing is exploited by the 'cultural entrepreneur' who copes with the eternal trade-off between cultural-artistic purposes and an efficient allocation of resources. As a matter of fact, inside of the organization the competition between marketing experts and fundraisers for the allocation of budget and resources is increasing. The paper's research goal is to investigate the revenue diversification in USA Universities, referring to 2012's data of IRS Forms with the highest 2012 revenues. The cluster analysis gives evidence that the highest gain is the result of the implementation of revenue diversification for hybrid profiles. The most crowded cluster is the Marketing Expert with the second highest gain. Focused on revenuemaximization, USA universities are surviving thanks to an efficient resource allocation in marketing, fundraising and other financing strategies.
VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 2016
This article explores how fundraising efficiency is affected by changes in diversification of revenues in non-profit organizations. It uses random effect regression and Arellano-Bond models to study this phenomenon in a sample of 10358 US non-profits during the 1997-2007 period. We find a negative impact on fundraising efficiency when NPOs alter their locus of dependence and change their pattern of diversification. This effect is affected by organizational size and industry. Previous studies have suggested that income heterogeneity is associated with organizational stability and financial strength. Using a changes (versus levels) model of funding diversity, our work shows that increased diversification leads to a higher operational inefficiency that could be penalised by potential donors.
Higher Education Firms Behavior Under Non-Profit Constraint
2010
The present exercise is oriented to analyze the interaction and equilibrium in the higher education market and firms behavior under non-profit constraint for public and private institutions. The model suggest three different equilibrium in which differences in size and quality are explained based on institutions non-pecuniary valuations of each of these attributes.
Benefits and Drivers of Nonprofit Revenue Concentration
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Nonprofit organizations (NPO) rely on a diverse mix of revenue sources. The existing literature mainly supports diversification among different revenue sources as desirable because it enables organizational stability. Using a new data set of over 200 Swiss fundraising charities, we prove the opposite to be true: organizations that displayed a higher degree of revenue concentration grew stronger between 2005 and 2012. We identify factors influencing the organization's capital and revenue structure. These factors can be divided into "nature" and "nurture" factors, which allows us to demonstrate which of them may be actively influenced by an organization's management and which stem from conditions of the organization that cannot be readily overcome by managerial interventions (such as age, size, and legal form). Revenue concentration is positively influenced both by an organization's geographical range of activity and dependence on its primary revenue source, and negatively influenced by board size and diversity.
Exploring the Revenue Mix of Nonprofit Organizations: Does It Relate to Publicness?
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2010
Nonprofit organizations offer a wide range of goods and services and seek funding from a variety of revenue sources. Our working theory n this paper is that the sources of funding are related to the services a nonprofit provides-specifically whether services are public, private, or mixed in the nature of their benefits. Using multiple subfields from three major fields in the National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities (NTEE), this study divides nonprofits according to service type, and estimates the impact of service character on particular revenue streams and overall level of revenue diversification. Generally, the proportion of revenues generated by program fees is lowest for the category deemed public, highest for those with mostly private benefits, and midway for "mixed" services which are private in character but entail substantial public benefits. Similarly, the more public a nonprofit's services, the greater the proportion of revenues it generates through donations. However, we also identify some puzzling results that suggest the need for continued investigation of the determinants of the sources and mixes of nonprofit income.
Revenue Diversification Strategies for Non-Governmental Organizations
Review of International Comparative Management
Nowadays, NGOs have an important place in our society, but unfortunately almost every NGO is struggling financial issues. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the main strategies NGOs have for revenue diversification, as a path to financial sustainability. This article focuses on Romanian NGOs and its main goal is to identify how NGOs choose their revenue diversification strategy. The empirical research consists in two case-studies, the focus being on identifying the revenue streams two NGOs have chosen. The main finding is that the choice of revenue strategies is related to the context each NGO has, context that can be described considering their life cycle, specialization, place within local and regional areas and the recent lessons each NGO has learned concerning specific revenue strategies. This study successfully defines the main concerns and limitations fundraising has and also contributes to academic debate about how to solve these issues.
Fundraising scenarios for state-founded universities
Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference "Economic Science for Rural Development", 2022
The creation of fundraising scenarios for state-founded universities and the selection of the most appropriate scenario is an important factor in the successful attraction of donations. The study will provide an analysis of three possible scenarios for fundraising, which have been evaluated by seven experts: representatives of patrons as private persons and enterprises, patron's fellow, a representative of the municipality, a representative of the Ministry of Education and Science, a representative of a higher education institution and a representative of a foundation. The first scenario consists of activities aimed at maintaining the existing fundraising trends. The second scenario is associated with a greater involvement of the municipality in attracting patrons to universities, whereas the third scenario comprises a greater state involvement in attracting patrons to universities. Expert opinions were processed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Choosing the best-case scenario will create an opportunity for philanthropic organizations of 12 state-founded universities to cooperate more fully with patrons in fundraising for their universities, projects and students.
Oil and water rarely mix: exploring the relative stability of nonprofit revenue mixes over time
This paper explores whether nonprofits are increasingly adopting mixed revenue strategies, and the sustainability of these strategies over time. We constructed a panel using NCCS (National Centre for Charitable Statistics) data from 1998 and 2007, and divided nonprofits into three groups: commercial, donative and mixed revenue. We found no evidence that nonprofits are increasingly adopting mixed revenue strategies. Mixed revenue strategies appeared less sustainable over time than predominately commercial or predominately donative strategies. Our results suggest that for most nonprofits, relying predominately on either commercial or donative revenue is a more stable equilibrium than attempting to achieve a balanced revenue mix. Exceptions may be those nonprofits, such as arts organisations, where there is a natural alliance between donors and customers.
Advancement in higher education: the role of marketing in building philanthropic giving
Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 2014
This paper empirically explores ways in which marketers of higher education can contribute to the important task of cultivating alumni philanthropy. Advancement professionals understand that philanthropy is influenced by wealth and affinity. As marketers, we anticipate that our contribution resides with investments in building affinity. Using survey data that measures the affinity of alumni of a large US university who have been commercially screened to reveal individual wealth, this paper provides empirical evidence of the relative contributions of affinity and wealth to giving. Logistic regression analysis reveals that affinity has a greater impact on predicting the likelihood of giving than other variables, including prior giving and wealth. Important to marketers, this study emphasizes the importance of building affinity and also uncovers obstacles to affinity formation. This information can be used to bridge and repair alumni relationships with their alma-mater and inform segmented marketing communications to foster alumni enthusiasm for giving.
Public Administration Review, 2001
This article addresses the question of whether operational efficiency is recognized and rewarded by the private funders that support nonprofit organizations in fields ranging from education to social service to arts and beyond. Looking at the administrative efficiency and fundraising results of a large sample of nonprofit organizations over an 11 year period, we find that nonprofits that position themselves as cost efficient-reporting low administrative to total expense ratios-fared no better over time than less efficient appearing organizations in the market for individuals, foundations, and corporate contributions. From this analysis, we suggest that economizing may not always be the best strategy in the nonprofit sector.