On Feyerabend's version of ‘Mach's theory of research and its relation to Einstein’ (original) (raw)

The paper critiques Feyerabend's interpretation of Mach's philosophy, arguing that his call for clarity and separation between physical arguments and epistemology mirrors a form of positivism that Mach would have rejected. It asserts that Mach's work embodies a monistic philosophy that intertwines scientific and philosophical premises, challenging the presumed dichotomy presented by Feyerabend. Additionally, the paper supports its claims through Mach's correspondence and by comparing historical philosophical themes, ultimately emphasizing the need for a unified understanding of Mach's contributions.