Priorities, Solidarity and the Watering Can. Research policies and conceptions of relevance in a Latin American traditional university setting (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Quest for University Research: Policies and Research Organization in Latin America
in Björn Wittrock and Aant Elzinga, editors, The University Research System - The Public Policies of the Home of Scientists, Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell International,, 1983
The often problematic relationship between scientific research and institutions of higher education is fairly obvious for those who follow the attempt to build up modern universities in societies without solid academic traditions or the problems faced by traditional and well-established universities in the context of rapidly expanding systems of higher education. The larger Latin American countries - Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Venezuela, Chile - have faced these two problems simultaneously during the past decades. Their institutions of higher education, previously open only to the heirs of the small elites in these countries, have rapidly evolved into large systems of mass education with hundreds of thousands of students. At the same time, a very limited tradition of scientific research in a few isolated institutions have given way to complex structures of science policy and administration and to fairly large networks of laboratories, research centers and graduate programs. During this process, new organizational structures have been superimposed on old ones, and new groups, without any previous experience with science or higher education, have been engaged in these activities - teachers, administrators, planners.
Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 2023
Research management instruments (RMIs) are organizational mechanisms that shape scientific work and influence the trajectory of scientific fields within universities. This qualitative study examines 80 RMIs implemented by eight research-oriented universities in Chile between 1998 and 2021. The findings reveal that these institutions employ policies prioritizing competition as the primary means of accessing funding and opportunities, contributing to the concentration of resources among established researchers participating in international circuits. Consequently, RMIs establish hierarchies within the research community based on individual merit, disregarding the material conditions that may hinder productivity for certain actors. Furthermore, these instruments discourage participation in national and regional scientific communication networks. By highlighting the impact of RMIs, this research enhances our understanding of the organizational mechanisms that shape scientific work in Chilean universities, offering insights into the challenges and opportunities researchers face in the country’s higher education system. Future studies should explore alternative participation circuits within Chilean universities and compare experiences across Latin American regions to understand how local institutions align with global evaluation criteria.
Science and Politics in Latin America: The Old and the New Context in Argentina
The aim of this paper is to analyse the development of science policy in Argentina, from its emergence almost four decades ago to its challenges in the current context. In contrast to the functional kind of analysis that has been usual in Latin America for a long time, the attempt is to develop a theoretical framework based on the relationships among the most significant actors (the state, the scientific community, the university, and the business sector), both in social and institutional development. The process of institutional transformation as well as the most relevant aspects of the national/international context are also taken into account. In the concluding section some of the substantive problems that will undoubtedly form part of the debate on science policy in Argentina and in Latin America in the years to come are discussed. Introduction THE DEVELOPMENT OF science policy in Argentina may in a sense be considered to be relatively similar to that of the majority of the most advanced Third World countries.’ Thus, it was in the decades succeeding the Second World War that a series of institutions were established whose objective was to become active in the fields of scientific and (although characteristically different) technological research. Many of the characteristics that this process gave rise to in Argentina present certain unique features that warrant special consideration. For this reason, the first part of this article will be devoted to describing this process as it unfolded in the Argentinian context. In the second part, we will analyse how conditions have transformed in the succeeding decades in order to arrive at the present situation which is characterised by a relationship between science and politics.
Academics and practitioners usually explain the expansion of research activities at private universities through referring to so-called best practices implemented by university administrators. This mainstream practitioners’ approach, represented by the classic works of Burton Clark (1998, 2004) on entrepreneurial universities and more recent studies on world-class universities by Philip Altbach and Jamil Salmi (Altbach and Salmi 2011, 2007) claim to identify administrative practices that are believed to improve financial sustainability and research capacities of universities. An alternative view, based on an instrumentalist perspective of sociologist of science Joseph Ben-David (Ben-David 1960; BenDavid and Zloczower 1962) allows focusing on the role of governments in establishing the conditions for the development of research activities in the private sector. This alternative approach can offer conceptual tools for practitioners interested in incentivizing the teaching or research profile of their universities. I will compare these competing explanations through contrasting both the government’s strategies and the scientific production of Chilean and Colombian private higher education sector. Based on the encountered similarities and differences, I claim that research production in the private sector is mainly explained by the role of governments in creating a stable market that financially supports scientific inquiry.
How to defend science in Argentina and beyond a view from Chile
How to defend science in Argentina, 2024
The paper argues about the inconvenience of recent scientific policy orientations in Argentina and describes three main ideas that could favor scientific and technological development in different Latin American countries. The first argument is about financing. The second deals with the functioning of the scientific pool, namely, universities. Finally, from an institutional perspective, it discusses the current porosity of the institutional boundaries of knowledge institutions and how these should be redefined to prevent the impertinent interference of political and economic spheres in their development.
Research policies and scientific production: A study of 94 Peruvian universities
PLOS ONE, 2021
Studies of research policies and scientific production are essential for strengthening educational systems and achieving objectives such as quality improvement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of research policies on the scientific production of public and private Peruvian universities. An observational, descriptive, secondary analysis study of the research policies of 92 universities and two graduate schools licensed by the National Superintendence of Higher Education of Peru (SUNEDU) was conducted for the period from 2016–2020. Scientific publications from educational institutions were collected from Scopus and Web of Science for the study period, and researchers certified by the National Council of Science and Technology of Peru (CONCYTEC) were divided by group and level. Multiple regression analysis was performed using two models. The analysis indicated that research policies did not influence scientific production in Scopus or Web of Science in either 2019 o...
Research Universities in Latin America: Public Policy and Political Constraints
The Research University Model in the Periphery: Altbach's Contributions Perhaps the most prevailing view about the knowledge society in recent decades is that globalization is making the world of knowledge and information more egalitarian, among other things bringing the ideal model of research universities within the reach of the " emerging " countries. Such perspective, clearly fostered by the media, is often challenged by researchers showing the persistent dominant position of selected countries and regions in the world of knowledge (see, for instance, Brunner 2010). The ideological and political debates, however, often eschew the most critical empirical question about the trends in knowledge production and use and on the role of universities (in particular the small group of research-intensive institutions) in the new knowledge economy, as they miss an analysis of the diffi cult political, economic, and academic issues involved in building such institutions. We may well single out Philip G. Altbach as the scholar who has most consistently discussed over the last few decades the issues in the diffusion of the research university model using a broad comparative perspective. Since the 1980s, Altbach use the center-periphery framework to education as he saw that the " central, " research-oriented institutions are part of the international knowledge system, while the " peripheral " institutions are not creative, but simply copy developments from abroad. Third world universities are peripheral institutions since they look to universities in the industrialized world for models, research, and direction (Altbach 1981 , 1998). Altbach clearly saw the reasons why emerging economies, in particular those in Asia, would want to emulate the Western model, stressing the originality of the versions of research universities evolving in that region, considering the legitimate
Minerva, 2018
The relationship between ''marginal'' and ''mainstream'' science has, in recent decades, become a matter of discussion. Traditional perspectives must be reexamined in the wake of transformations in the international circulation of knowledge and the subsequent diversification of scientific ''peripherality''. Argentina represents an interesting case with which to explore the structure of ''peripheral centres'' and new forms of scientific development. While it has recently experienced an expansion in terms of institutionalization, professionalization, and internationalization, that process has been coupled with entrenchment of existing institutional asymmetries and persistent intra-national inequalities; academic prestige is distributed according to opposite principles of legitimation (local/international). Our main task is to explore the current state of research capacities pursuant to that expansion in order to analyze the diverse styles in which knowledge is produced. In our analysis, we make critical use of Bourdieu's concept of field and the Latin This paper discusses part of the studies on Argentina's academic field conducted within the Research Program on Academic Dependency in Latin America (PIDAAL), directed by Fernanda Beigel in the frame of CONICET and the
The article describes the tensions between two competing approaches to scientific policy in Argentina. The traditional vision favors autonomous research. The neoliberal conception fosters the link between science and markets. In the past few years, a neodevelopmentalist current also tries to stress relevance of scientific research. Finally, the article describes how the Open Access movement has entered the debate. The World Bank intervention and the human rights dimension of the question are discussed in depth. The article introduces the notion of open knowledge as a guiding criterion to design a human-rights based scientific policy.
The Modern Higher Education Review, 2020
It is evident that, especially in the recent decades, the scientific institutions have strongly evolved and modified their structures in order to be adapted to the changing socio-cultural environment as well as to be more aware of the need to generate new knowledge in order to support the economic growth. Social sciences tried to interpret the process of institutionalization of science in the academic world in various ways, analyzing the social components of the process of creating the knowledge. The approach in social sciences is primarily characterized by the study of the level of institutionalization that enables the study of the features that, in turn, define science as a social institution. This approach is useful in the study of higher education systems because the institutionalized principles make the structure of an organization and primarily provide the information about what regulates the formation of a university and not only about what regulates the behavior of an indivi...