The Adaptation And Validation Of The Turkish Version Of The Three-Branch Emotional Intelligence Rating Scale (original) (raw)
Related papers
Adaptation of an emotional intelligence scale for Turkish educators1
emotional intelligence scale was adapted and administered to 177 Turkish educators. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses were performed. In order to confirm the authors' model and findings of previous research, one, two, three, and four factor models were examined. It was decided that the one factor model fitted the data better for the selected sample. In addition, gender, age, and job experience of the participants were also investigated in conjunction with their emotional intelligence scores. However, the emotional intelligence scores did not differ for any of these variables. Male and females scored similarly. Also, it was revealed that emotional intelligence scores of the participants did not differ as their age and job experience increases.
Psicometric Properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQe) in Turkish
Current Psychology, 2017
The present study focused on the translation of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) to the Turkish speaking people. The TEIQue was completed by 500 undergraduate students created from two different sample. Study followed two step as linguistic equivalence and validity-reliability analyses. Psychometric analysis provided evidence in support of the reliability of the TEIQue (at the facet, factor, and global levels) and the confirmed four-factor structure (Well-Being, Sociability, Self-Control, and Emotionality). This solution accounted for 66.3% of the total variance, and factor loading was .493-816. With regard to CFA and internal consistency of four factors and Global TEIQue, the Turkish version showed acceptable psychometrics and was in concordance with the original version. This study also found significant sex differences among factors and Global TEI. Female participants had higher scores on Wellbeing, Emotionality, and Global TEI. TEIQue would contribute as the base for further studies, and literature by adding data from Turkey.
Personality and Individual Differences, 2000
The study examined reliability and validity of a new measure of emotional (i.e. non-cognitive) intelligence, the Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i; , in a sample of 243 university students. Results indicated that the EQ-i domain and component scales had good item homogeneity and internal consistency. Scores were not unduly aected by response styles or biases. The EQ-i scales had a meaningful pattern of convergent validities with respect to measures of normal personality, depression, somatic symptomatology, intensity of aective experience and alexithymia. The reliability and validity results for men and women were very similar. Overall, the results suggested that the EQ-i is a promising measure of emotional intelligence. We recommend strategies for further validation of the EQ-i, as well as the construct of emotional intelligence. #
A Study on Emotional Intelligence Measures: Analysis and Comparison
International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 2014
In the past few years, there is a growing concern for researching emotional intelligence (EI). Studies have uncovered that EI tends to be a promising attribute in predicting individual and professional accomplishment. The present paper analyzes and compares the EI measures, which stand out against in content and their evaluation. In this editorial, the four major EI measures i.e. Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI), Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQI), Multifactor Emotional Intelligence Scale (MEIS), Mayer–Salovey– Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test V.2 (MSCEIT) are assessed and compared and a conclusion is establish based on the study. The existing EI measurements serve a four- or five-factor model, but work and non-work results are being unnoticed. After examining various EI dimensions, it is anticipated that further controlled research should be acted upon separately for incremental validity of EI measures in projecting job and other work performances instead of applying traditio...
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE SCALE: A CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS APPROACH
The aim of present study is to examine the factor structure, construct validity and reliability of Emotional Intelligence Scale developed by Bhattacharya that consists of 40 items. The study concerned 100 managers and 300 non managers from 10 companies who are working in Indian Automobile Sector. The respondents were asked to respond a five point Likert scale that from never true to always true. The collected data was analyzed with help of SPSS 18.0 and Moment of Structure version 18 (AMOS) software packages. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted to find out the number of latent variables that was needed to explain the correlations among a set of observed variables after that a first order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) applied. Emotional Intelligence Scale constructs revealed a satisfactory level of internal consistency A good model fit was found for the measurement model (First order CFA model) using several fit indices like chi square/degree of freedom (CMIN/DF), comparative-fit index (CFI), Tucker Lewis index (TLI) and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) showed that all fit indices criteria were fulfilled or model is good fit. The indices of convergent validity, discriminant validity and reliability like CR, AVE, MSV, ASV and Cronbach’s Alpha also showed the good acceptable value of all the construct of measurement model of Emotional Intelligence Scale.
This study aimed to set up and develop a Jordanian version of the (EI) Scale, and to detect the levels of (EI)among students of (UJ), and to find out the differences between participants' (EI) level according some variables as: sex (male, female), age, school year, and the type of college (scientific, humanities). The study sample consisted of (156) students from the UJ (79 males, 77 girls) drawn from (4) faculties (two scientific, two humanities). The validity of the scale in its Jordanian version have been checked through the rate of arbitrators' agreement which was (9.9), and the internal construction validity by getting correlation coefficient between performance on all dimensions and performance on the total score of the scale. The results showed that the correlation coefficient between the total score of the scale and the score of each dimension has a significant difference at the level of (0,05). For the scale Cronbach's alpha result was (0.465) , and Split-Half Method was (0.527). The study result found that The Students of the UJ have normal (average) level of (EI). There was no statistically significant differences in the level of (EI) among students of the (UJ), according to gender variable , with the exception of the fifth dimension in favor of males. There were no statistically significant differences in the level of (EI) among students of the (UJ), according to age variable. There were no statistically significant differences in the level of (EI)among students of the (UJ), according to the school year variable. There was no statistically significant differences in the level of (EI) among students of the (UJ), according to the college variable (scientific, humanities) with the exception of two dimensions (fifth and seventh) in favor of faculties of humanities.
Validity and Reliability of a Brief Emotional Intelligence Scale (BEIS-10)
Journal of Individual Differences, 2010
This study describes the development and validation of a brief self-report measure of emotional intelligence based on Salovey and Mayer’s (1990) conceptualization. In stage one, the 33-item Emotional Intelligence Scale (EIS: Schutte et al., 1998) was assessed for content validity by a panel of experts. The panel deemed 17 items unsuitable for further analysis. In stage two, a theoretically derived
2012
Objective: This study is aimed at examining the rela-tionship of emotional intelligence (EI) and intelligence quotient (IQ) with academic performance (AP) among postgraduate students. Study Design: Survey type with convenient sampl-ing. Place and Duration of Study: Shakoor Mind Care Institute Bahawalpur and the department of applied psychology Islamia University of Bahawalpur during 1 st February 2012 to 31 st May 2012. Subjects and Methods: For this purpose 50 postgra-duate students (n = 50) were selected from different departments of the Islamia University of Bahawalpur. After taking informed consent from each student, Wechsler Adults Intelligence Scale - III (WAIS - III) and Self Report Measure of Emotional Intelligence (SRMEI) was administered and the score for each stu-dent calculated. As a measure of the academic perfor-mance (AP), the cumulative grade point average (CG-PA) of each participant was obtained and confirmed from their respective departments. The data collec...