Effect of chlorhexidine and ethanol-wet bonding with a hydrophobic adhesive to intraradicular dentine (original) (raw)

Effects of adhesive systems and luting agents on bonding of fiber posts to root canal dentin

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, 2006

The study evaluated the influence of different luting materials on the microtensile bond strength of glass fiber posts to root canal dentin. Thirty extracted maxillary premolars were endodontically treated, and the roots were prepared for post cementation using the FRC Postec system (Vivadent). Two luting materials (Multilink, Vivadent and Clearfil Photo Core, Kuraray) were used in combination with three adhesive: Multilink Primer (Vivadent), Clearfil Photo Bond, and Clearfil New Bond (Kuraray). A composite build-up was performed around the root to provide adequate gripping during testing. Specimens were cut to obtain beams with the post in the center and with the radicular dentin overlaid by the composite build-up on each side. Microtensile testing was performed with a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. The failure mode was classified under a stereomicroscope and four representative beams of each group were selected for SEM analysis. Bond strength data that were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons tests revealed that adhesive systems, luting materials, and the interaction between these two factors significantly influenced the bond strength results (p < 0.01). Multilink applied with its own adhesive system obtained the best results, while the lowest bond strength was achieved with clearfil photo core in combination with multilink primer.

Influence of adhesive cementation systems on the bond strength of relined fiber posts to root dentin

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2017

For decades, endodontically treated teeth have been restored using indirect restorative materials cemented to cast metal posts. 1 Although these types of post present some advantages, such as stable mechanical retention and higher adaptation to root canal preparation (reduced cement film thickness), the higher elastic modulus of metals than of tooth structure is a disadvantage that may lead to catastrophic root fracture. 1 Currently, glass fiber Supported by grants from Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Level Education Personnel (CAPES; 1777-2014) and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq; 307217-2014-0).

Comparison Between Two Clinical Procedures for Bonding Fiber Posts into a Root Canal: A Microscopic Investigation

Journal of Endodontics, 2002

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of two brushes used as carriers of a primer-adhesive solution as to the formation of resin tags, adhesive lateral branches, and a hybrid layer when used to bond translucent fiber posts. Twenty endodontically treated teeth, extracted for periodontal reasons, were used. The samples were randomly divided into two groups of 10 samples each (Group 1: Microbrush ؉ Scotchbond 1 ؉ Rely X ARC resin cement; Group 2: small plastic brush ؉ Scotchbond 1 ؉ Rely X ARC resin cement). The adhesive system and resin cement were used strictly following manufacturers' instructions. The priming-adhesive solution of the one-bottle system was light-cured before placing the resin cement and the post. Twenty translucent fiber posts were used. After luting procedures, root samples were processed for SEM observations. The adhesive system showed a resin dentin interdiffusion zone (RDIZ), resin tag, and adhesive lateral branch formation. Microscopic examination of restored interfaces of group 1 showed a higher percentage (p < 0.05) of RDIZ than those found in samples of group 2. In group 1 samples, RDIZ morphology was well detectable and uniform in all thirds of the root canals. In group 2, RDIZ was not visible in the apical third. No statistically significant differences were found among the two groups coronally and at the middle third, but the apical third of group 1 showed significantly more resin tag formation than group 2. The characteristic reverse cone shape of resin tags was always noted in the coronal and middle third of the root canals of both groups and in the apical third of group 1. In the apical third of group 2 root canals, the resin tags showed a less uniform morphology and a shorter length than those found in the other observed thirds.

Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo

Clinical Oral Investigations

Objectives To investigate the effect of different pre-treatments on the long-term bond strength of fiberglass posts luted either with dual-curing self-etch adhesives and core build-up composites or with a self-adhesive resin (SAR) cement. Materials and methods In total, 180 human root-filled teeth received post-space preparations and three different dentin pre-treatments (PTs): PT1, ethanol (99%); PT2, ethanol-tertiary-butanol-water-solution (AH Plus Cleaner, Dentsply Sirona; York, USA); and PT3, distilled water (control). Five luting systems were used: FU, Futurabond U (Voco; Cuxhaven, Germany); CL, Clearfil DC Bond (Kuraray Noritake; Okayama, Japan); GR, Gradia Core SE Bond (GC Europe NV; Leuven, Belgium); LU, LuxaBond Universal (DMG; Hamburg, Germany); and RX, RelyX Unicem 2 (3M; Minnesota, USA). Roots were cut into six slices (1 mm thick). From each root canal region, three slices were submitted to immediate and three to post-storage push-out testing. The latter were subjected t...

Effect of Intracanal Dentin Conditioning with Xylene, Phosphoric Acid and Chlorhexidine on Bond Strength to Glass Fiber Post with Self-Adhesive Cement

Journal of Islamic Dental Association of IRAN

Background and Aim: Debonding is the most commonly encountered failure in teeth restored with fiber posts that mainly occurs at the weakest interface (dentin-cement interface). Thus, reinforcement of this interface is mandatory. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different root dentin surface treatments after post space preparation on bond strength of fiber posts cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement. Materials and Methods: Forty extracted sound single-rooted teeth underwent root canal therapy. After post space preparation, the teeth were assigned to four group of 10 teeth according to the type of dentin surface treatment: Group 1: 2% chlorhexidine rinse, group 2: 37% phosphoric acid etching and then irrigating with saline, group 3: rinse with xylene and then irrigation with saline, group 4: rinse with saline (control group). Then, fiber posts were cemented with Total cem cement and the teeth were sectioned horizontally. Specimens were observed under a stereomicroscope at X10 magnification and failure modes of each group were determined. Results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Results: There was no significant difference between the mean bond strength of the four groups (P=0.174). The highest mean bond strength value was found in phosphoric acid group (8.18±3.19 MPa) and the lowest belonged to the control group (6.21±1.81 MPa). Conclusion: Our results showed that dentin surface treatment with phosphoric acid before cementation of fiber posts with a self-adhesive cement improves the bond strength.

Effect of Intracanal Post Space Treatments on Push-Out Bond Strength of Fiber Posts to Root Dentin

Journal of Dentistry of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2017

The main disadvantage of fiber posts is their low bond strength to root canal wall. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of different root canal post space treatments on push-out bond strength of fiber posts to root canal dentin. After post space preparation in 40 endodontically treated human premolars, the teeth were randomly divided into four experimental groups: Group 1: control group, group 2: Endsolv R, group 3: ultrasonic cleaning, group 4: Clearfil Repair. Afterwards, the posts were bonded with Panavia F 2.0 bonding cement. The bond strength of fiber posts to root canal wall in the middle part of canal was evaluated following thermocycling using push-out test. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tamhane's multiple comparisons test. The failure mode of each group was determined under a stereomicroscope. There was a significant difference in the mean push-out bond strength among the groups (P<0.05). The lowest bond strength was noted in the contro...

Adhesion of bulk-fill resin composites as core and intraradicular post materials only versus the use of glass-fiber posts in different regions of root dentin.

This study assessed adhesion of bulk-fill resin-composites as core and post materials only versus the use of fiber resin composite (FRC) posts. Human teeth (N ¼ 84) were cut at the CEJ and endodontically treated and randomly divided into seven groups: TP: Titanium post (Flat Head T); SFRC: S2-glass FRC (Pinpost); EFRC1: E-glass FRC (GC Everstick) directly bonded; GFRC: E-glass FRC (Glassix Nordin); EFRC2: E-glass FRC (Everstick); BF1: Bulk-fill resin (Surefill SDR); BF2: Bulk-fill resin (SonicFill). Groups TP, SFRC, EFRC and GFRC were cemented (Panavia 21), while other groups were bonded directly to the intraradicular dentin. The core parts were constructed using a resin composite (G-aenial) except for Groups BF1 and BF2. The core-cervical dentin interface was loaded under shear forces. Push-out tests were performed in a Universal Testing Machine (1 mm/min). Data (MPa) were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukeys tests (a ¼ 0.05). Not the root level (p > 0.05) but the type of core and post material significantly affected shear and push-out bond results (p < 0.001). BF1 (9.2 ± 2.1) and BF2 (9.3 ± 3.1) showed significantly lower bond strength to the cervical dentin (p < 0.05) compared to other groups (11.6 ± 2.5-19 ± 6.8). FRC post types did not show significant difference being higher than those of TP, BF1 and BF2 (0.57 ± 0.37-2.34 ± 1.98) (p > 0.05). Partial cohesive core fracture was more common while BF1 and BF2 showed exclusively adhesive failures. Cohesive failure in the cement was frequent in Group TP (53%) compared to other groups (3-24%). BF1 and BF2 presented exclusively complete adhesive failure of the bulk-fill material.

Carbon fiber post adhesion to resin luting cement in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth

2000

Carbon ®ber posts (CFP) are widely used in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth to enhance the mechanical behavior in spite of metallic posts and to prevent vertical fractures of the tooth under chewing loads. The post is cemented inside the canal lumen using polymer resins with Young's modulus lower than dentine. In this conditions the stress concentration is located at the post-cement interface and in the cement bulk itself, preserving radicular dentine from dangerous stress accumulation. The mechanical resistance of CFP posts cemented in human dentine was evaluated by the means of mechanical pull-out tests assisted by the ®nite element analysis. The average bond strength and the critical stress values of the CHP-cement interface were 25 MPa and 50 MPa respectively.

Clinical evaluation of the use of fiber posts and direct resin restorations for endodontically treated teeth

The International journal of prosthodontics

Restoration of root-treated teeth is routinely performed in clinical practice with a choice of therapeutic options, considering many factors to provide optimal mechanical properties, esthetics, and longevity. The aim of the present work was to present a preliminary clinical report on the use of fiber posts and direct resin composites for restoring root-treated teeth. Thirty-eight anterior and 62 posterior endodontically treated teeth were selected from 3 private prosthodontic offices. The protocol used included endodontic treatment, with translucent fiber posts (DT post) bonded to the post-space using a '1-bottle' adhesive (One-Step, Bisco) and a dual-cure resin cement (DuoLink, Bisco). Direct resin restorations were performed using a micro-hybrid resin composite (Gradia Direct, GC) and a layering technique. Both opaque dentin and enamel and translucent enamel shades were used. Patients were recalled after 6, 12, 24, and 30 months, and the restorations assessed according to ...