Low Workload as a Trigger of Sick Leave (original) (raw)

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate if exposure to an unusually low workload when ill can trigger taking sick leave. Methods: A case-crossover design was applied to 546 sick-leave spells obtained from a cohort of 1430 employees within six Swedish workplaces. New sick-leave spells were reported from the workplaces during 3 to 12 months follow-up. Exposure was assessed in structured participant interviews at sick leave. Case and control periods from the same individual were sampled according to the matched-pair and usualfrequency approaches. Results are presented as odds ratios with surrounding 95% confidence intervals. Results: The odds ratio of sick leave on a day with an unusually low workload was 2.57 (confidence interval, 1.07-6.16). Conclusions: Becoming ill on a day with a lower workload than usual can trigger the decision to take sick leave.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (41)

  1. Alexanderson K, Norlund A, eds. Sickness absence: causes, consequences, and physicians' sickness certification practice. A systematic literature review by the Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). Scand J Public Health. 2004;32:3-263.
  2. Mulder M. Social Insurance in Figures 2010. Stockholm: Swedish Social Insurance Agency; 2011.
  3. Johansson G. The Illness Flexibility Model and Sickness Absence [thesis].
  4. Johansson G, Lundberg I. Adjustment latitude and attendance requirements as determinants of sickness absence or attendance. Empirical tests of the illness flexibility model. Soc Sci Med. 2004;58:1857-1868.
  5. Kristensen TS. Sickness absence and work strain among Danish slaughter- house workers: an analysis of absence from work regarded as coping be- haviour. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32:15-27.
  6. Nicholson N. Absence behavior and attendance motivation-a conceptual syntesis. J Manage Stud. 1977;14:231-252.
  7. Steers RM, Rhodes SR. Major influences on employee attendance-Process Model. J Appl Psychol. 1978;63:391-407.
  8. Johansson G, Lundberg I. Components of the illness flexibility model as explanations of socioeconomic differences in sickness absence. Int J Health Serv. 2009;39:123-138.
  9. Kristensen TS. Sygefavaer som coping (Sickness absence as coping) (in Danish). Socialmedicinsk tidskrift. 1995;1:12-17.
  10. Nicholson N, Johns G. The Absence culture and the psychological contract- who's in control of absence. Acad Manage Rev. 1985;10:397-407.
  11. Boedeker W. Associations between workload and diseases rarely oc- curring in sickness absence data. J Occup Environ Med. 2001;43: 1081-1088.
  12. Duijts SFA, Kant J, Swaen GMH, van den Brandt PA, Zeegers MPA. A meta- analysis of observational studies identifies predictors of sickness absence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:1105-1115.
  13. Krantz G, Lundberg U. Workload, work stress, and sickness absence in Swedish male and female white-collar employees. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34:238-246.
  14. Labriola M, Christensen KB, Lund T, Nielsen ML, Diderichsen F. Multi- level analysis of workplace and individual risk factors for long-term sickness absence. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48:923-929.
  15. Gimeno D, Benavides FG, Amick BC III, Benach J, Martinez JM. Psychoso- cial factors and work related sickness absence among permanent and non- permanent employees. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:870-876.
  16. Hultin H, Hallqvist J, Alexanderson K, et al. Low level of adjustment latitude-a risk factor for sickness absence. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20: 682-688.
  17. Burton JP, Lee TW, Holtom BC. The influence of motivation to attend, abil- ity to attend, and organizational commitment on different types of absence behaviors. J Manag Issues. 2002;XIV:181-197.
  18. Hoogendoorn WE, Bongers PM, de Vet HCW, Ariens GAM, van Mechelen W, Bouter LM. High physical work load and low job satisfaction increase the risk of sickness absence due to low back pain: results of a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 2002;59:323-328.
  19. Josephson M, Vingard E. Zest for work? Assessment of enthusiasm and satisfaction with the present work situation and health-a 1.5-year follow-up study. Work. 2007;29:225-231.
  20. Marmot M, Feeney A, Shipley M, North F, Syme SL. Sickness absence as a measure of health status and functioning: from the UK Whitehall II study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995;49:124-130.
  21. Muchinsky PM. Employee absenteeism-review of literature. J Vocat Behav. 1977;10:316-340.
  22. Munch-Hansen T, Wieclaw J, Agerbo E, Westergaard-Nielsen N, Bonde JP. Global measure of satisfaction with psychosocial work conditions versus measures of specific aspects of psychosocial work conditions in explaining sickness absence. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:270.
  23. Nicholson N, Brown CA, Chadwickjones JK. Absence from work and job satisfaction. J Appl Psychol. 1976;61:728-737.
  24. Notenbomer A, Roelen CAM, Groothoff JW. Job satisfaction and short- term sickness absence among Dutch workers. Occup Med (Lond). 2006;56: 279-281.
  25. Roelen CA, Koopmans PC, Notenbomer A, Groothoff JW. Job satisfac- tion and sickness absence: a questionnaire survey. Occup Med (Lond). 2008;58:567-571.
  26. Hultin H, Hallqvist J, Alexanderson K, et al. Work-related psychosocial events as triggers of sick leave -results from a Swedish case-crossover study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:175.
  27. Maclure M. The case-crossover design: a method for studying transient effects on the risk of acute events. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133:144-153.
  28. Maclure M, Mittleman MA. Should we use a case-crossover design? Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:193-221.
  29. Eriksson T, Maclure M, Kragstrup J. Consultation with the general practitioner triggered by advice from social network members. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004;22:54-59.
  30. Eriksson T, Maclure M, Kragstrup J. To what extent do mass media health messages trigger patients' contacts with their GPs? Br J Gen Pract. 2005;55: 212-217.
  31. Maclure M. "Why me?" versus "why now?"-differences between operational hypotheses in case-control versus case-crossover studies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007;16:850-853.
  32. Statistics Sweden Swedish socio-economic classification (SEI). Reports on Statistical Co-ordination. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden; 1982:4.
  33. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  34. Mittleman MA, Maclure M, Robins JM. Control sampling strategies for case-crossover studies: an assessment of relative efficiency. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142:91-98.
  35. Redelmeier DA, Tibshirani RJ. Interpretation and bias in case-crossover studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1281-1287.
  36. Dahl-Jorgensen C, Mo TO, Saksvik PO. Absence as a coping strategy for better health? (In Norwegian). Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning. 2002;43: 3-29.
  37. Hultin H, Hallqvist J, Alexanderson K, et al. Low level of adjust- ment latitude-a risk factor for sickness absence. Eur J Public Health. 2010;20:682-688. Published Online First: 9 February 2010. doi:2010.1093/ eurpub/ckp2240.
  38. McKevitt C, Morgan M, Dundas R, Holland WW. Sickness absence and "working through" illness: a comparison of two professional groups. J Public Health Med. 1997;19:295-300.
  39. Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity, and the Recon- struction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books; 1990.
  40. Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain- implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q. 1979;24:285-308.
  41. Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: HarperCollins; 1990.